| ... |
... |
@@ -1,108
+1,0 @@ |
| 1 |
|
-===Framing=== |
| 2 |
|
- |
| 3 |
|
- |
| 4 |
|
-====The role of the ballot is to vote for the debater who better performatively and methodologically resists surveillance. CX checks any ambiguities.==== |
| 5 |
|
- |
| 6 |
|
- |
| 7 |
|
-====The surveillance state corrupts scholarship through "thoughtcrime" – confronting this is a prior question==== |
| 8 |
|
-**Steinberg 13** ~~R. Lila Steinberg, PhD student at UCLA; 3-8-2013; "The Premise of Digital Surveillance Precludes Scholarship"; http://www.truth-out.org/opinion/item/14839-the-premise-of-digital-surveillance-precludes-scholarship~~ JC |
| 9 |
|
-However, a new "For Whites Only" or "For Men Only" |
| 10 |
|
-AND |
| 11 |
|
-prior restraint on the very foundation of scholarship - wide and uncensored inquiry. |
| 12 |
|
- |
| 13 |
|
- |
| 14 |
|
-====Surveillance has invaded public pedagogy, coopting dissent, debate, and critical dialogue, resistance is key to avoid global violence==== |
| 15 |
|
-**Giroux 14** Global TV Network Chair Professorship at McMaster University in the English and Cultural Studies Department and a Distinguished Visiting Professorship at Ryerson University ~~Henry, "Totalitarian Paranoia in the Post-Orwellian Surveillance State," Truthout, February 10, 2014, http://www.truth-out.org/opinion/item/21656-totalitarian-paranoia-in-the-post-orwellian-surveillance-state~~ |
| 16 |
|
-The point of no return in the emergence of the corporate-state surveillance apparatus |
| 17 |
|
-AND |
| 18 |
|
-the very real threat of violence on both a domestic and global level. |
| 19 |
|
- |
| 20 |
|
- |
| 21 |
|
-==== "The practice of surveillance is both separate and unequal." Minority groups represent the bulk of those targeted ==== |
| 22 |
|
-**Giroux 14** Global TV Network Chair Professorship at McMaster University in the English and Cultural Studies Department and a Distinguished Visiting Professorship at Ryerson University ~~Henry, "Totalitarian Paranoia in the Post-Orwellian Surveillance State," Truthout, February 10, 2014, http://www.truth-out.org/opinion/item/21656-totalitarian-paranoia-in-the-post-orwellian-surveillance-state~~ ellipses included in original article |
| 23 |
|
-The practice of surveillance is both separate and unequal. ... Welfare recipients ... are |
| 24 |
|
-AND |
| 25 |
|
-state violence by making an appeal to the necessity of safety and security. |
| 26 |
|
- |
| 27 |
|
- |
| 28 |
|
-====It's try or die – the surveillance state ensures genocide and extinction==== |
| 29 |
|
-**Saul 15** ~~Quincy, Author, Editor, and Founder of Ecosocialist Horizons, March 23, The Four Horsemen of the Apocalypse, Truth Out, http://www.truth-out.org/opinion/item/29664-the-four-horsemen-of-the-apocalypse~~ |
| 30 |
|
-Surveillance States: 1984 has arrived, only 30 years after Orwell predicted. The |
| 31 |
|
-AND |
| 32 |
|
-to realize it. Time to seize the day and never let go. |
| 33 |
|
- |
| 34 |
|
- |
| 35 |
|
-====The ballot is key - just like voting in system of government, casting a ballot in a debate is an endorsement of material change. Thus, the judge is not just the arbiter of who wins the debate, but is recognized as an agent implementing change on a micropolitical level. ==== |
| 36 |
|
-**Foucault 81** Michel, 1981, an interview with Libération, "Is it really important to think?" *brackets in original |
| 37 |
|
-Liberation: On election night we asked you for your initial reactions. You didn't |
| 38 |
|
-AND |
| 39 |
|
-relation in which work ~~le travail~~ will have an important role. |
| 40 |
|
- |
| 41 |
|
- |
| 42 |
|
-====Debate should surround material consequences—ideal theories ignore the concrete nature of the world and legitimize oppression.==== |
| 43 |
|
-**Curry 14** ~~Dr. Tommy J; "The Cost of a Thing: A Kingian Reformulation of a Living Wage Argument in the 21st Century", Victory Briefs, 2014~~ |
| 44 |
|
-Despite the pronouncement of debate as an activity and intellectual exercise pointing to the real |
| 45 |
|
-AND |
| 46 |
|
-economic structures which necessitate tangible policies and reorienting changes in our value orientations. |
| 47 |
|
- |
| 48 |
|
- |
| 49 |
|
-===Contention=== |
| 50 |
|
- |
| 51 |
|
- |
| 52 |
|
-====The censorship of online speech enables universities to monitor their students and staff – everything from emails and social media to campus whereabouts. This draws parallels to NSA surveillance, as universities shut down criticism of the surveillance regime. ==== |
| 53 |
|
-**Perrino 13** ~~Nico; 10-22-2013; "Universities: where you go to learn – and be monitored"; https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2013/oct/22/online-social-media-surveillance-university-campuses~~ JC |
| 54 |
|
-It monitors email and social media accounts, uses thousands of surveillance cameras to track |
| 55 |
|
-AND |
| 56 |
|
-To roll it back, we must take into account its entire scope. |
| 57 |
|
- |
| 58 |
|
- |
| 59 |
|
-====This debate should center around online speech – it's the core controversy of the topic==== |
| 60 |
|
-**Creeley and Lukianoff 11** ~~Will Creeley – Director of Legal and Public Advocacy, Foundation for Individual Rights in Education. J.D., New York University School of Law, 2006; B.A., New York University, Gallatin School of Individualized Study, 2003. Greg Lukianoff – President, Foundation for Individual Rights in Education. J.D., Stanford Law School, 2000; B.A., American University, 1996.; "NEW MEDIA, OLD PRINCIPLES: DIGITAL COMMUNICATION AND FREE SPEECH ON CAMPUS"; 5/13/2011; https://www.thefire.org/pdfs/e674c6c95dec401e5a62c9bbc409112c.pdf~~ JC |
| 61 |
|
-With every passing year, the longstanding battle over freedom of expression for students at |
| 62 |
|
-AND |
| 63 |
|
-) or would be protected in society at large (at private colleges). |
| 64 |
|
- |
| 65 |
|
- |
| 66 |
|
-====Thus, I affirm: Public colleges and universities in the United States ought not restrict any constitutionally protected online speech.==== |
| 67 |
|
-**Creeley and Lukianoff 11** ~~Will Creeley – Director of Legal and Public Advocacy, Foundation for Individual Rights in Education. J.D., New York University School of Law, 2006; B.A., New York University, Gallatin School of Individualized Study, 2003. Greg Lukianoff – President, Foundation for Individual Rights in Education. J.D., Stanford Law School, 2000; B.A., American University, 1996.; "NEW MEDIA, OLD PRINCIPLES: DIGITAL COMMUNICATION AND FREE SPEECH ON CAMPUS"; 5/13/2011; https://www.thefire.org/pdfs/e674c6c95dec401e5a62c9bbc409112c.pdf~~ JC |
| 68 |
|
-Further, the new visibility of speech offers opportunities for increased understanding and tolerance of |
| 69 |
|
-AND |
| 70 |
|
-we can begin to resolve the current tension regarding online speech on campus. |
| 71 |
|
- |
| 72 |
|
- |
| 73 |
|
-====The aff solves:==== |
| 74 |
|
- |
| 75 |
|
- |
| 76 |
|
-====1~~ Resisting surveillance in education causes a widespread culture shift==== |
| 77 |
|
-**Taylor 13** ~~Emmeline Taylor; "Surveillance Schools: Security, Discipline and Control in Contemporary Education" (Crime Prevention and Security Management); 2013~~ JC |
| 78 |
|
-Upcoming generations will emerge from Surveillance Schools desensitised to, and expectant of, intense |
| 79 |
|
-AND |
| 80 |
|
-social interaction and nowhere is the surveillance revolution more crystallised than in schools. |
| 81 |
|
- |
| 82 |
|
- |
| 83 |
|
-====2~~ Surveillance uniquely threatens students' freedoms. Criticizing and protesting surveillance both on campus and in debate is vital to civic engagement and social change. ==== |
| 84 |
|
-**Glaser 14** — April Glaser, Staff Activist at the Electronic Frontier Foundation, 2014 ("17 Student Groups Pen Open Letters on the Toxicity of Mass Surveillance to Academic Freedom," Electronic Frontier Foundation, June 9^^th^^, Available Online at https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2014/06/students-against-surveillance-17-university-groups-pen-open-letters-toxicity-mass) |
| 85 |
|
-Students are rising up and fighting to protect our Internet. In response to our |
| 86 |
|
-AND |
| 87 |
|
-, push for change, and put an end to mass government surveillance. |
| 88 |
|
- |
| 89 |
|
- |
| 90 |
|
-====Students are key – no one else will oppose surveillance. ==== |
| 91 |
|
-**Tempera 13** — Jackie Tempera, Summer USA Today Collegiate Correspondent, Journalism Student at Emerson College, 2013 ("Viewpoint: Where are the college students protesting NSA surveillance?," USA Today, June 19^^th^^, Available Online at http://college.usatoday.com/2013/06/19/opinion-where-are-the-college-students-protesting-nsa-surveillance/) |
| 92 |
|
-The college-age generation has been known as the protesters, the action takers |
| 93 |
|
-AND |
| 94 |
|
-For all I care, vehemently argue for it — just do something. |
| 95 |
|
- |
| 96 |
|
- |
| 97 |
|
-====3~~ The AFF's critical interrogation and analyses of surveillance is crucial to analyzing the way in which daily life and the body itself has become a feature of securitization—our dissent functions as an unravelling and exposure of dominant power relations ==== |
| 98 |
|
-**Giroux 14** Global TV Network Chair Professorship at McMaster University in the English and Cultural Studies Department and a Distinguished Visiting Professorship at Ryerson University ~~Henry, "Totalitarian Paranoia in the Post-Orwellian Surveillance State," Truthout, February 10, 2014, http://www.truth-out.org/opinion/item/21656-totalitarian-paranoia-in-the-post-orwellian-surveillance-state~~ |
| 99 |
|
-Totalitarian paranoia runs deep in American society, and it now inhabits the highest levels |
| 100 |
|
-AND |
| 101 |
|
-an educational endeavour and responsibility as it is a political and cultural task. |
| 102 |
|
- |
| 103 |
|
- |
| 104 |
|
-====Pedagogical praxis is key – translating critique into action is key to making education central in political effectiveness.==== |
| 105 |
|
-**Giroux 14** Global TV Network Chair Professorship at McMaster University in the English and Cultural Studies Department and a Distinguished Visiting Professorship at Ryerson University ~~Henry, "Totalitarian Paranoia in the Post-Orwellian Surveillance State," Truthout, February 10, 2014, http://www.truth-out.org/opinion/item/21656-totalitarian-paranoia-in-the-post-orwellian-surveillance-state~~ |
| 106 |
|
-Dissent is crucial to any viable notion of democracy and provides a powerful counterforce to |
| 107 |
|
-AND |
| 108 |
|
-most evident in the insults and patriotic gore heaped on Manning and Snowden. |