Changes for page San Marino Deng Aff
Summary
-
Objects (0 modified, 6 added, 0 removed)
Details
- Caselist.CitesClass[13]
-
- Cites
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,108 @@ 1 +===Framing=== 2 + 3 + 4 +====The role of the ballot is to vote for the debater who better performatively and methodologically resists surveillance. CX checks any ambiguities.==== 5 + 6 + 7 +====The surveillance state corrupts scholarship through "thoughtcrime" – confronting this is a prior question==== 8 +**Steinberg 13** ~~R. Lila Steinberg, PhD student at UCLA; 3-8-2013; "The Premise of Digital Surveillance Precludes Scholarship"; http://www.truth-out.org/opinion/item/14839-the-premise-of-digital-surveillance-precludes-scholarship~~ JC 9 +However, a new "For Whites Only" or "For Men Only" 10 +AND 11 +prior restraint on the very foundation of scholarship - wide and uncensored inquiry. 12 + 13 + 14 +====Surveillance has invaded public pedagogy, coopting dissent, debate, and critical dialogue, resistance is key to avoid global violence==== 15 +**Giroux 14** Global TV Network Chair Professorship at McMaster University in the English and Cultural Studies Department and a Distinguished Visiting Professorship at Ryerson University ~~Henry, "Totalitarian Paranoia in the Post-Orwellian Surveillance State," Truthout, February 10, 2014, http://www.truth-out.org/opinion/item/21656-totalitarian-paranoia-in-the-post-orwellian-surveillance-state~~ 16 +The point of no return in the emergence of the corporate-state surveillance apparatus 17 +AND 18 +the very real threat of violence on both a domestic and global level. 19 + 20 + 21 +==== "The practice of surveillance is both separate and unequal." Minority groups represent the bulk of those targeted ==== 22 +**Giroux 14** Global TV Network Chair Professorship at McMaster University in the English and Cultural Studies Department and a Distinguished Visiting Professorship at Ryerson University ~~Henry, "Totalitarian Paranoia in the Post-Orwellian Surveillance State," Truthout, February 10, 2014, http://www.truth-out.org/opinion/item/21656-totalitarian-paranoia-in-the-post-orwellian-surveillance-state~~ ellipses included in original article 23 +The practice of surveillance is both separate and unequal. ... Welfare recipients ... are 24 +AND 25 +state violence by making an appeal to the necessity of safety and security. 26 + 27 + 28 +====It's try or die – the surveillance state ensures genocide and extinction==== 29 +**Saul 15** ~~Quincy, Author, Editor, and Founder of Ecosocialist Horizons, March 23, The Four Horsemen of the Apocalypse, Truth Out, http://www.truth-out.org/opinion/item/29664-the-four-horsemen-of-the-apocalypse~~ 30 +Surveillance States: 1984 has arrived, only 30 years after Orwell predicted. The 31 +AND 32 +to realize it. Time to seize the day and never let go. 33 + 34 + 35 +====The ballot is key - just like voting in system of government, casting a ballot in a debate is an endorsement of material change. Thus, the judge is not just the arbiter of who wins the debate, but is recognized as an agent implementing change on a micropolitical level. ==== 36 +**Foucault 81** Michel, 1981, an interview with Libération, "Is it really important to think?" *brackets in original 37 +Liberation: On election night we asked you for your initial reactions. You didn't 38 +AND 39 +relation in which work ~~le travail~~ will have an important role. 40 + 41 + 42 +====Debate should surround material consequences—ideal theories ignore the concrete nature of the world and legitimize oppression.==== 43 +**Curry 14** ~~Dr. Tommy J; "The Cost of a Thing: A Kingian Reformulation of a Living Wage Argument in the 21st Century", Victory Briefs, 2014~~ 44 +Despite the pronouncement of debate as an activity and intellectual exercise pointing to the real 45 +AND 46 +economic structures which necessitate tangible policies and reorienting changes in our value orientations. 47 + 48 + 49 +===Contention=== 50 + 51 + 52 +====The censorship of online speech enables universities to monitor their students and staff – everything from emails and social media to campus whereabouts. This draws parallels to NSA surveillance, as universities shut down criticism of the surveillance regime. ==== 53 +**Perrino 13** ~~Nico; 10-22-2013; "Universities: where you go to learn – and be monitored"; https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2013/oct/22/online-social-media-surveillance-university-campuses~~ JC 54 +It monitors email and social media accounts, uses thousands of surveillance cameras to track 55 +AND 56 +To roll it back, we must take into account its entire scope. 57 + 58 + 59 +====This debate should center around online speech – it's the core controversy of the topic==== 60 +**Creeley and Lukianoff 11** ~~Will Creeley – Director of Legal and Public Advocacy, Foundation for Individual Rights in Education. J.D., New York University School of Law, 2006; B.A., New York University, Gallatin School of Individualized Study, 2003. Greg Lukianoff – President, Foundation for Individual Rights in Education. J.D., Stanford Law School, 2000; B.A., American University, 1996.; "NEW MEDIA, OLD PRINCIPLES: DIGITAL COMMUNICATION AND FREE SPEECH ON CAMPUS"; 5/13/2011; https://www.thefire.org/pdfs/e674c6c95dec401e5a62c9bbc409112c.pdf~~ JC 61 +With every passing year, the longstanding battle over freedom of expression for students at 62 +AND 63 +) or would be protected in society at large (at private colleges). 64 + 65 + 66 +====Thus, I affirm: Public colleges and universities in the United States ought not restrict any constitutionally protected online speech.==== 67 +**Creeley and Lukianoff 11** ~~Will Creeley – Director of Legal and Public Advocacy, Foundation for Individual Rights in Education. J.D., New York University School of Law, 2006; B.A., New York University, Gallatin School of Individualized Study, 2003. Greg Lukianoff – President, Foundation for Individual Rights in Education. J.D., Stanford Law School, 2000; B.A., American University, 1996.; "NEW MEDIA, OLD PRINCIPLES: DIGITAL COMMUNICATION AND FREE SPEECH ON CAMPUS"; 5/13/2011; https://www.thefire.org/pdfs/e674c6c95dec401e5a62c9bbc409112c.pdf~~ JC 68 +Further, the new visibility of speech offers opportunities for increased understanding and tolerance of 69 +AND 70 +we can begin to resolve the current tension regarding online speech on campus. 71 + 72 + 73 +====The aff solves:==== 74 + 75 + 76 +====1~~ Resisting surveillance in education causes a widespread culture shift==== 77 +**Taylor 13** ~~Emmeline Taylor; "Surveillance Schools: Security, Discipline and Control in Contemporary Education" (Crime Prevention and Security Management); 2013~~ JC 78 +Upcoming generations will emerge from Surveillance Schools desensitised to, and expectant of, intense 79 +AND 80 +social interaction and nowhere is the surveillance revolution more crystallised than in schools. 81 + 82 + 83 +====2~~ Surveillance uniquely threatens students' freedoms. Criticizing and protesting surveillance both on campus and in debate is vital to civic engagement and social change. ==== 84 +**Glaser 14** — April Glaser, Staff Activist at the Electronic Frontier Foundation, 2014 ("17 Student Groups Pen Open Letters on the Toxicity of Mass Surveillance to Academic Freedom," Electronic Frontier Foundation, June 9^^th^^, Available Online at https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2014/06/students-against-surveillance-17-university-groups-pen-open-letters-toxicity-mass) 85 +Students are rising up and fighting to protect our Internet. In response to our 86 +AND 87 +, push for change, and put an end to mass government surveillance. 88 + 89 + 90 +====Students are key – no one else will oppose surveillance. ==== 91 +**Tempera 13** — Jackie Tempera, Summer USA Today Collegiate Correspondent, Journalism Student at Emerson College, 2013 ("Viewpoint: Where are the college students protesting NSA surveillance?," USA Today, June 19^^th^^, Available Online at http://college.usatoday.com/2013/06/19/opinion-where-are-the-college-students-protesting-nsa-surveillance/) 92 +The college-age generation has been known as the protesters, the action takers 93 +AND 94 +For all I care, vehemently argue for it — just do something. 95 + 96 + 97 +====3~~ The AFF's critical interrogation and analyses of surveillance is crucial to analyzing the way in which daily life and the body itself has become a feature of securitization—our dissent functions as an unravelling and exposure of dominant power relations ==== 98 +**Giroux 14** Global TV Network Chair Professorship at McMaster University in the English and Cultural Studies Department and a Distinguished Visiting Professorship at Ryerson University ~~Henry, "Totalitarian Paranoia in the Post-Orwellian Surveillance State," Truthout, February 10, 2014, http://www.truth-out.org/opinion/item/21656-totalitarian-paranoia-in-the-post-orwellian-surveillance-state~~ 99 +Totalitarian paranoia runs deep in American society, and it now inhabits the highest levels 100 +AND 101 +an educational endeavour and responsibility as it is a political and cultural task. 102 + 103 + 104 +====Pedagogical praxis is key – translating critique into action is key to making education central in political effectiveness.==== 105 +**Giroux 14** Global TV Network Chair Professorship at McMaster University in the English and Cultural Studies Department and a Distinguished Visiting Professorship at Ryerson University ~~Henry, "Totalitarian Paranoia in the Post-Orwellian Surveillance State," Truthout, February 10, 2014, http://www.truth-out.org/opinion/item/21656-totalitarian-paranoia-in-the-post-orwellian-surveillance-state~~ 106 +Dissent is crucial to any viable notion of democracy and provides a powerful counterforce to 107 +AND 108 +most evident in the insults and patriotic gore heaped on Manning and Snowden. - EntryDate
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +2017-01-14 19:44:16.0 - Judge
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +Ellen Ivens-Duran - Opponent
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +Dougherty Valley PT - ParentRound
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +14 - Round
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +1 - Team
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +San Marino Deng Aff - Title
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +JanFeb- Surveillance AC - Tournament
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +Harvard Westlake
- Caselist.CitesClass[14]
-
- Cites
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,108 @@ 1 +==1AC== 2 + 3 + 4 +===Framing=== 5 + 6 + 7 +====The role of the ballot is to vote for the debater who better performatively and methodologically resists surveillance.==== 8 + 9 + 10 +====The surveillance state corrupts scholarship through "thoughtcrime" – confronting this is a prior question==== 11 +**Steinberg 13** ~~R. Lila Steinberg, PhD student at UCLA; 3-8-2013; "fThe Premise of Digital Surveillance Precludes Scholarship"; http://www.truth-out.org/opinion/item/14839-the-premise-of-digital-surveillance-precludes-scholarship~~ JC 12 +However, a new "For Whites Only" or "For Men Only" 13 +AND 14 +prior restraint on the very foundation of scholarship - wide and uncensored inquiry. 15 + 16 + 17 +====Surveillance has invaded public pedagogy, coopting dissent, debate, and critical dialogue, resistance is key to avoid global violence==== 18 +**Giroux 14** Global TV Network Chair Professorship at McMaster University in the English and Cultural Studies Department and a Distinguished Visiting Professorship at Ryerson University ~~Henry, "Totalitarian Paranoia in the Post-Orwellian Surveillance State," Truthout, February 10, 2014, http://www.truth-out.org/opinion/item/21656-totalitarian-paranoia-in-the-post-orwellian-surveillance-state~~ 19 +The point of no return in the emergence of the corporate-state surveillance apparatus 20 +AND 21 +the very real threat of violence on both a domestic and global level. 22 + 23 + 24 +==== "The practice of surveillance is both separate and unequal." Minority groups represent the bulk of those targeted ==== 25 +**Giroux 14** Global TV Network Chair Professorship at McMaster University in the English and Cultural Studies Department and a Distinguished Visiting Professorship at Ryerson University ~~Henry, "Totalitarian Paranoia in the Post-Orwellian Surveillance State," Truthout, February 10, 2014, http://www.truth-out.org/opinion/item/21656-totalitarian-paranoia-in-the-post-orwellian-surveillance-state~~ ellipses included in original article 26 +The practice of surveillance is both separate and unequal. ... Welfare recipients ... are 27 +AND 28 +state violence by making an appeal to the necessity of safety and security. 29 + 30 + 31 +====It's try or die – the surveillance state ensures genocide and extinction==== 32 +**Saul 15** ~~Quincy, Author, Editor, and Founder of Ecosocialist Horizons, March 23, The Four Horsemen of the Apocalypse, Truth Out, http://www.truth-out.org/opinion/item/29664-the-four-horsemen-of-the-apocalypse~~ 33 +Surveillance States: 1984 has arrived, only 30 years after Orwell predicted. The 34 +AND 35 +to realize it. Time to seize the day and never let go. 36 + 37 + 38 +====The ballot is key - just like voting in system of government, casting a ballot in a debate is an endorsement of material change. Thus, the judge is not just the arbiter of who wins the debate, but is recognized as an agent implementing change on a micropolitical level. ==== 39 +**Foucault 81** Michel, 1981, an interview with Libération, "Is it really important to think?" *brackets in original 40 +Liberation: On election night we asked you for your initial reactions. You didn't 41 +AND 42 +relation in which work ~~le travail~~ will have an important role. 43 + 44 + 45 +====Debate should surround material consequences—ideal theories ignore the concrete nature of the world and legitimize oppression.==== 46 +**Curry 14** ~~Dr. Tommy J; "The Cost of a Thing: A Kingian Reformulation of a Living Wage Argument in the 21st Century", Victory Briefs, 2014~~ 47 +Despite the pronouncement of debate as an activity and intellectual exercise pointing to the real 48 +AND 49 +economic structures which necessitate tangible policies and reorienting changes in our value orientations. 50 + 51 + 52 +===Offense=== 53 + 54 + 55 +====This debate should center around online speech – it's the core controversy of the topic==== 56 +**Creeley and Lukianoff 11** ~~Will Creeley – Director of Legal and Public Advocacy, Foundation for Individual Rights in Education. J.D., New York University School of Law, 2006; B.A., New York University, Gallatin School of Individualized Study, 2003. Greg Lukianoff – President, Foundation for Individual Rights in Education. J.D., Stanford Law School, 2000; B.A., American University, 1996.; "NEW MEDIA, OLD PRINCIPLES: DIGITAL COMMUNICATION AND FREE SPEECH ON CAMPUS"; 5/13/2011; https://www.thefire.org/pdfs/e674c6c95dec401e5a62c9bbc409112c.pdf~~ JC 57 +With every passing year, the longstanding battle over freedom of expression for students at 58 +AND 59 +) or would be protected in society at large (at private colleges). 60 + 61 + 62 +====Thus the plan – Resolved: Public colleges and universities in the United States ought not restrict any constitutionally protected online speech.==== 63 +**Creeley and Lukianoff 11** ~~Will Creeley – Director of Legal and Public Advocacy, Foundation for Individual Rights in Education. J.D., New York University School of Law, 2006; B.A., New York University, Gallatin School of Individualized Study, 2003. Greg Lukianoff – President, Foundation for Individual Rights in Education. J.D., Stanford Law School, 2000; B.A., American University, 1996.; "NEW MEDIA, OLD PRINCIPLES: DIGITAL COMMUNICATION AND FREE SPEECH ON CAMPUS"; 5/13/2011; https://www.thefire.org/pdfs/e674c6c95dec401e5a62c9bbc409112c.pdf~~ JC 64 +Further, the new visibility of speech offers opportunities for increased understanding and tolerance of 65 +AND 66 +we can begin to resolve the current tension regarding online speech on campus. 67 + 68 + 69 +====The censorship of online speech enables universities to monitor their students and staff – everything from emails and social media to campus whereabouts. This draws parallels to NSA surveillance, as universities shut down criticism of the surveillance regime. ==== 70 +**Perrino 13** ~~Nico; 10-22-2013; "Universities: where you go to learn – and be monitored"; https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2013/oct/22/online-social-media-surveillance-university-campuses~~ JC 71 +It monitors email and social media accounts, uses thousands of surveillance cameras to track 72 +AND 73 +To roll it back, we must take into account its entire scope. 74 + 75 + 76 +====Speech restriction sets a dangerous precedent that enables endless exceptions to the First Amendment.==== 77 +**White 16** ~~Ken White (attorney), 11-29-2016, "Lawsplainer: Why Flag Burning Matters, And How It Relates To Crush Videos", https://www.popehat.com/2016/11/29/lawsplainer-why-flag-burning-matters-and-how-it-relates-to-crush-videos/~~ 78 +It's significant because of the way the government defended the statute. The government's lead 79 +AND 80 +." Marbury v. Madison , 1 Cranch 137, 178 (1803). 81 + 82 + 83 +====Resisting surveillance in education causes a widespread culture shift==== 84 +**Taylor 13** ~~Emmeline Taylor; "Surveillance Schools: Security, Discipline and Control in Contemporary Education" (Crime Prevention and Security Management); 2013~~ JC 85 +Upcoming generations will emerge from Surveillance Schools desensitised to, and expectant of, intense 86 +AND 87 +social interaction and nowhere is the surveillance revolution more crystallised than in schools. 88 + 89 + 90 +====Surveillance uniquely threatens students' freedoms. Criticizing and protesting surveillance both on campus and in debate is vital to civic engagement and social change. ==== 91 +**Glaser 14** — April Glaser, Staff Activist at the Electronic Frontier Foundation, 2014 ("17 Student Groups Pen Open Letters on the Toxicity of Mass Surveillance to Academic Freedom," Electronic Frontier Foundation, June 9^^th^^, Available Online at https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2014/06/students-against-surveillance-17-university-groups-pen-open-letters-toxicity-mass) 92 +Students are rising up and fighting to protect our Internet. In response to our 93 +AND 94 +, push for change, and put an end to mass government surveillance. 95 + 96 + 97 +====The AFF's critical interrogation and analyses of surveillance is crucial to analyzing the way in which daily life and the body itself has become a feature of securitization—our dissent functions as an unravelling and exposure of dominant power relations ==== 98 +**Giroux 14** Global TV Network Chair Professorship at McMaster University in the English and Cultural Studies Department and a Distinguished Visiting Professorship at Ryerson University ~~Henry, "Totalitarian Paranoia in the Post-Orwellian Surveillance State," Truthout, February 10, 2014, http://www.truth-out.org/opinion/item/21656-totalitarian-paranoia-in-the-post-orwellian-surveillance-state~~ **bracketed for grammar** 99 +Totalitarian paranoia runs deep in American society, and it now inhabits the highest levels 100 +AND 101 +an educational endeavour and responsibility as it is a political and cultural task. 102 + 103 + 104 +====Pedagogical praxis is key – translating critique into action is key to making education central in political effectiveness.==== 105 +**Giroux 14** Global TV Network Chair Professorship at McMaster University in the English and Cultural Studies Department and a Distinguished Visiting Professorship at Ryerson University ~~Henry, "Totalitarian Paranoia in the Post-Orwellian Surveillance State," Truthout, February 10, 2014, http://www.truth-out.org/opinion/item/21656-totalitarian-paranoia-in-the-post-orwellian-surveillance-state~~ 106 +Dissent is crucial to any viable notion of democracy and provides a powerful counterforce to 107 +AND 108 +most evident in the insults and patriotic gore heaped on Manning and Snowden. - EntryDate
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +2017-02-11 19:57:06.0 - Judge
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +Shayne Walton - Opponent
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +Mountain View DZ - ParentRound
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +15 - Round
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +2 - Team
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +San Marino Deng Aff - Title
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +JanFeb- Surveillance AC v2 - Tournament
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +Stanford
- Caselist.CitesClass[15]
-
- Cites
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,105 @@ 1 +===Framing=== 2 + 3 + 4 +====The role of the ballot is to vote for the debater who better performatively and methodologically resists surveillance from the position of the undercommons.==== 5 + 6 + 7 +====The surveillance state corrupts scholarship through "thoughtcrime" – confronting this is a prior question==== 8 +**Steinberg 13** ~~R. Lila Steinberg, PhD student at UCLA; 3-8-2013; "fThe Premise of Digital Surveillance Precludes Scholarship"; http://www.truth-out.org/opinion/item/14839-the-premise-of-digital-surveillance-precludes-scholarship~~ JC 9 +However, a new "For Whites Only" or "For Men Only" 10 +AND 11 +prior restraint on the very foundation of scholarship - wide and uncensored inquiry. 12 + 13 + 14 +====Surveillance has invaded public pedagogy, coopting dissent, debate, and critical dialogue, resistance is key to avoid global violence==== 15 +**Giroux 14** Global TV Network Chair Professorship at McMaster University in the English and Cultural Studies Department and a Distinguished Visiting Professorship at Ryerson University ~~Henry, "Totalitarian Paranoia in the Post-Orwellian Surveillance State," Truthout, February 10, 2014, http://www.truth-out.org/opinion/item/21656-totalitarian-paranoia-in-the-post-orwellian-surveillance-state~~ 16 +The point of no return in the emergence of the corporate-state surveillance apparatus 17 +AND 18 +the very real threat of violence on both a domestic and global level. 19 + 20 + 21 +==== "The practice of surveillance is both separate and unequal." Minority groups represent the bulk of those targeted ==== 22 +**Giroux 14** Global TV Network Chair Professorship at McMaster University in the English and Cultural Studies Department and a Distinguished Visiting Professorship at Ryerson University ~~Henry, "Totalitarian Paranoia in the Post-Orwellian Surveillance State," Truthout, February 10, 2014, http://www.truth-out.org/opinion/item/21656-totalitarian-paranoia-in-the-post-orwellian-surveillance-state~~ ellipses included in original article 23 +The practice of surveillance is both separate and unequal. ... Welfare recipients ... are 24 +AND 25 +state violence by making an appeal to the necessity of safety and security. 26 + 27 + 28 +====It's try or die – the surveillance state ensures genocide and extinction==== 29 +**Saul 15** ~~Quincy, Author, Editor, and Founder of Ecosocialist Horizons, March 23, The Four Horsemen of the Apocalypse, Truth Out, http://www.truth-out.org/opinion/item/29664-the-four-horsemen-of-the-apocalypse~~ 30 +Surveillance States: 1984 has arrived, only 30 years after Orwell predicted. The 31 +AND 32 +to realize it. Time to seize the day and never let go. 33 + 34 + 35 +====The ballot is key - just like voting in system of government, casting a ballot in a debate is an endorsement of material change. Thus, the judge is not just the arbiter of who wins the debate, but is recognized as an agent implementing change on a micropolitical level. ==== 36 +**Foucault 81** Michel, 1981, an interview with Libération, "Is it really important to think?" *brackets in original 37 +Liberation: On election night we asked you for your initial reactions. You didn't 38 +AND 39 +relation in which work ~~le travail~~ will have an important role. 40 + 41 + 42 +====Debate should surround material consequences—ideal theories ignore the concrete nature of the world and legitimize oppression.==== 43 +**Curry 14** ~~Dr. Tommy J; "The Cost of a Thing: A Kingian Reformulation of a Living Wage Argument in the 21st Century", Victory Briefs, 2014~~ 44 +Despite the pronouncement of debate as an activity and intellectual exercise pointing to the real 45 +AND 46 +economic structures which necessitate tangible policies and reorienting changes in our value orientations. 47 + 48 + 49 +===Offense=== 50 + 51 + 52 +====This debate should center around online speech – it's the core controversy of the topic==== 53 +**Creeley and Lukianoff 11** ~~Will Creeley – Director of Legal and Public Advocacy, Foundation for Individual Rights in Education. J.D., New York University School of Law, 2006; B.A., New York University, Gallatin School of Individualized Study, 2003. Greg Lukianoff – President, Foundation for Individual Rights in Education. J.D., Stanford Law School, 2000; B.A., American University, 1996.; "NEW MEDIA, OLD PRINCIPLES: DIGITAL COMMUNICATION AND FREE SPEECH ON CAMPUS"; 5/13/2011; https://www.thefire.org/pdfs/e674c6c95dec401e5a62c9bbc409112c.pdf~~ JC 54 +With every passing year, the longstanding battle over freedom of expression for students at 55 +AND 56 +) or would be protected in society at large (at private colleges). 57 + 58 + 59 +====Thus the plan – Resolved: Public colleges and universities in the United States ought not restrict any constitutionally protected online speech.==== 60 +**Creeley and Lukianoff 11** ~~Will Creeley – Director of Legal and Public Advocacy, Foundation for Individual Rights in Education. J.D., New York University School of Law, 2006; B.A., New York University, Gallatin School of Individualized Study, 2003. Greg Lukianoff – President, Foundation for Individual Rights in Education. J.D., Stanford Law School, 2000; B.A., American University, 1996.; "NEW MEDIA, OLD PRINCIPLES: DIGITAL COMMUNICATION AND FREE SPEECH ON CAMPUS"; 5/13/2011; https://www.thefire.org/pdfs/e674c6c95dec401e5a62c9bbc409112c.pdf~~ JC 61 +Further, the new visibility of speech offers opportunities for increased understanding and tolerance of 62 +AND 63 +we can begin to resolve the current tension regarding online speech on campus. 64 + 65 + 66 +====The censorship of online speech enables universities to monitor their students and staff – everything from emails and social media to campus whereabouts. This draws parallels to NSA surveillance, as universities shut down criticism of the surveillance regime. ==== 67 +**Perrino 13** ~~Nico; 10-22-2013; "Universities: where you go to learn – and be monitored"; https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2013/oct/22/online-social-media-surveillance-university-campuses~~ JC 68 +It monitors email and social media accounts, uses thousands of surveillance cameras to track 69 +AND 70 +To roll it back, we must take into account its entire scope. 71 + 72 + 73 +====Speech restriction sets a dangerous precedent that enables endless exceptions to the First Amendment.==== 74 +**White 16** ~~Ken White (attorney), 11-29-2016, "Lawsplainer: Why Flag Burning Matters, And How It Relates To Crush Videos", https://www.popehat.com/2016/11/29/lawsplainer-why-flag-burning-matters-and-how-it-relates-to-crush-videos/~~ 75 +It's significant because of the way the government defended the statute. The government's lead 76 +AND 77 +." Marbury v. Madison , 1 Cranch 137, 178 (1803). 78 + 79 + 80 +====Resisting surveillance in education causes a widespread culture shift==== 81 +**Taylor 13** ~~Emmeline Taylor; "Surveillance Schools: Security, Discipline and Control in Contemporary Education" (Crime Prevention and Security Management); 2013~~ JC 82 +Upcoming generations will emerge from Surveillance Schools desensitised to, and expectant of, intense 83 +AND 84 +social interaction and nowhere is the surveillance revolution more crystallised than in schools. 85 + 86 + 87 +====Surveillance uniquely threatens students' freedoms. Criticizing and protesting surveillance both on campus and in debate is vital to civic engagement and social change. ==== 88 +**Glaser 14** — April Glaser, Staff Activist at the Electronic Frontier Foundation, 2014 ("17 Student Groups Pen Open Letters on the Toxicity of Mass Surveillance to Academic Freedom," Electronic Frontier Foundation, June 9^^th^^, Available Online at https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2014/06/students-against-surveillance-17-university-groups-pen-open-letters-toxicity-mass) 89 +Students are rising up and fighting to protect our Internet. In response to our 90 +AND 91 +, push for change, and put an end to mass government surveillance. 92 + 93 + 94 +====The AFF's critical interrogation and analyses of surveillance is crucial to analyzing the way in which daily life and the body itself has become a feature of securitization—our dissent functions as an unravelling and exposure of dominant power relations ==== 95 +**Giroux 14** Global TV Network Chair Professorship at McMaster University in the English and Cultural Studies Department and a Distinguished Visiting Professorship at Ryerson University ~~Henry, "Totalitarian Paranoia in the Post-Orwellian Surveillance State," Truthout, February 10, 2014, http://www.truth-out.org/opinion/item/21656-totalitarian-paranoia-in-the-post-orwellian-surveillance-state~~ **bracketed for grammar** 96 +Totalitarian paranoia runs deep in American society, and it now inhabits the highest levels 97 +AND 98 +an educational endeavour and responsibility as it is a political and cultural task. 99 + 100 + 101 +====Pedagogical praxis is key – translating critique into action is key to making education central in political effectiveness.==== 102 +**Giroux 14** Global TV Network Chair Professorship at McMaster University in the English and Cultural Studies Department and a Distinguished Visiting Professorship at Ryerson University ~~Henry, "Totalitarian Paranoia in the Post-Orwellian Surveillance State," Truthout, February 10, 2014, http://www.truth-out.org/opinion/item/21656-totalitarian-paranoia-in-the-post-orwellian-surveillance-state~~ 103 +Dissent is crucial to any viable notion of democracy and provides a powerful counterforce to 104 +AND 105 +most evident in the insults and patriotic gore heaped on Manning and Snowden. - EntryDate
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +2017-02-13 17:30:23.0 - Judge
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +Sean Fee, Terrence Lonam, Tim Pollard - Opponent
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +Harvard Westlake JN - ParentRound
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +16 - Round
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +Doubles - Team
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +San Marino Deng Aff - Title
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +JanFeb- Surveillance AC v3 - Tournament
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +Stanford
- Caselist.RoundClass[14]
-
- Cites
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +13 - EntryDate
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +2017-01-14 19:44:14.0 - Judge
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +Ellen Ivens-Duran - Opponent
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +Dougherty Valley PT - Round
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +1 - Tournament
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +Harvard Westlake
- Caselist.RoundClass[15]
-
- Cites
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +14 - EntryDate
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +2017-02-11 19:57:04.0 - Judge
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +Shayne Walton - Opponent
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +Mountain View DZ - Round
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +2 - Tournament
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +Stanford
- Caselist.RoundClass[16]
-
- Cites
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +15 - EntryDate
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +2017-02-13 17:30:21.0 - Judge
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +Sean Fee, Terrence Lonam, Tim Pollard - Opponent
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +Harvard Westlake JN - Round
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +Doubles - Tournament
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +Stanford