| ... |
... |
@@ -1,0
+1,108 @@ |
|
1 |
+===Framing=== |
|
2 |
+ |
|
3 |
+ |
|
4 |
+====The role of the ballot is to vote for the debater who better performatively and methodologically resists surveillance. CX checks any ambiguities.==== |
|
5 |
+ |
|
6 |
+ |
|
7 |
+====The surveillance state corrupts scholarship through "thoughtcrime" – confronting this is a prior question==== |
|
8 |
+**Steinberg 13** ~~R. Lila Steinberg, PhD student at UCLA; 3-8-2013; "The Premise of Digital Surveillance Precludes Scholarship"; http://www.truth-out.org/opinion/item/14839-the-premise-of-digital-surveillance-precludes-scholarship~~ JC |
|
9 |
+However, a new "For Whites Only" or "For Men Only" |
|
10 |
+AND |
|
11 |
+prior restraint on the very foundation of scholarship - wide and uncensored inquiry. |
|
12 |
+ |
|
13 |
+ |
|
14 |
+====Surveillance has invaded public pedagogy, coopting dissent, debate, and critical dialogue, resistance is key to avoid global violence==== |
|
15 |
+**Giroux 14** Global TV Network Chair Professorship at McMaster University in the English and Cultural Studies Department and a Distinguished Visiting Professorship at Ryerson University ~~Henry, "Totalitarian Paranoia in the Post-Orwellian Surveillance State," Truthout, February 10, 2014, http://www.truth-out.org/opinion/item/21656-totalitarian-paranoia-in-the-post-orwellian-surveillance-state~~ |
|
16 |
+The point of no return in the emergence of the corporate-state surveillance apparatus |
|
17 |
+AND |
|
18 |
+the very real threat of violence on both a domestic and global level. |
|
19 |
+ |
|
20 |
+ |
|
21 |
+==== "The practice of surveillance is both separate and unequal." Minority groups represent the bulk of those targeted ==== |
|
22 |
+**Giroux 14** Global TV Network Chair Professorship at McMaster University in the English and Cultural Studies Department and a Distinguished Visiting Professorship at Ryerson University ~~Henry, "Totalitarian Paranoia in the Post-Orwellian Surveillance State," Truthout, February 10, 2014, http://www.truth-out.org/opinion/item/21656-totalitarian-paranoia-in-the-post-orwellian-surveillance-state~~ ellipses included in original article |
|
23 |
+The practice of surveillance is both separate and unequal. ... Welfare recipients ... are |
|
24 |
+AND |
|
25 |
+state violence by making an appeal to the necessity of safety and security. |
|
26 |
+ |
|
27 |
+ |
|
28 |
+====It's try or die – the surveillance state ensures genocide and extinction==== |
|
29 |
+**Saul 15** ~~Quincy, Author, Editor, and Founder of Ecosocialist Horizons, March 23, The Four Horsemen of the Apocalypse, Truth Out, http://www.truth-out.org/opinion/item/29664-the-four-horsemen-of-the-apocalypse~~ |
|
30 |
+Surveillance States: 1984 has arrived, only 30 years after Orwell predicted. The |
|
31 |
+AND |
|
32 |
+to realize it. Time to seize the day and never let go. |
|
33 |
+ |
|
34 |
+ |
|
35 |
+====The ballot is key - just like voting in system of government, casting a ballot in a debate is an endorsement of material change. Thus, the judge is not just the arbiter of who wins the debate, but is recognized as an agent implementing change on a micropolitical level. ==== |
|
36 |
+**Foucault 81** Michel, 1981, an interview with Libération, "Is it really important to think?" *brackets in original |
|
37 |
+Liberation: On election night we asked you for your initial reactions. You didn't |
|
38 |
+AND |
|
39 |
+relation in which work ~~le travail~~ will have an important role. |
|
40 |
+ |
|
41 |
+ |
|
42 |
+====Debate should surround material consequences—ideal theories ignore the concrete nature of the world and legitimize oppression.==== |
|
43 |
+**Curry 14** ~~Dr. Tommy J; "The Cost of a Thing: A Kingian Reformulation of a Living Wage Argument in the 21st Century", Victory Briefs, 2014~~ |
|
44 |
+Despite the pronouncement of debate as an activity and intellectual exercise pointing to the real |
|
45 |
+AND |
|
46 |
+economic structures which necessitate tangible policies and reorienting changes in our value orientations. |
|
47 |
+ |
|
48 |
+ |
|
49 |
+===Contention=== |
|
50 |
+ |
|
51 |
+ |
|
52 |
+====The censorship of online speech enables universities to monitor their students and staff – everything from emails and social media to campus whereabouts. This draws parallels to NSA surveillance, as universities shut down criticism of the surveillance regime. ==== |
|
53 |
+**Perrino 13** ~~Nico; 10-22-2013; "Universities: where you go to learn – and be monitored"; https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2013/oct/22/online-social-media-surveillance-university-campuses~~ JC |
|
54 |
+It monitors email and social media accounts, uses thousands of surveillance cameras to track |
|
55 |
+AND |
|
56 |
+To roll it back, we must take into account its entire scope. |
|
57 |
+ |
|
58 |
+ |
|
59 |
+====This debate should center around online speech – it's the core controversy of the topic==== |
|
60 |
+**Creeley and Lukianoff 11** ~~Will Creeley – Director of Legal and Public Advocacy, Foundation for Individual Rights in Education. J.D., New York University School of Law, 2006; B.A., New York University, Gallatin School of Individualized Study, 2003. Greg Lukianoff – President, Foundation for Individual Rights in Education. J.D., Stanford Law School, 2000; B.A., American University, 1996.; "NEW MEDIA, OLD PRINCIPLES: DIGITAL COMMUNICATION AND FREE SPEECH ON CAMPUS"; 5/13/2011; https://www.thefire.org/pdfs/e674c6c95dec401e5a62c9bbc409112c.pdf~~ JC |
|
61 |
+With every passing year, the longstanding battle over freedom of expression for students at |
|
62 |
+AND |
|
63 |
+) or would be protected in society at large (at private colleges). |
|
64 |
+ |
|
65 |
+ |
|
66 |
+====Thus, I affirm: Public colleges and universities in the United States ought not restrict any constitutionally protected online speech.==== |
|
67 |
+**Creeley and Lukianoff 11** ~~Will Creeley – Director of Legal and Public Advocacy, Foundation for Individual Rights in Education. J.D., New York University School of Law, 2006; B.A., New York University, Gallatin School of Individualized Study, 2003. Greg Lukianoff – President, Foundation for Individual Rights in Education. J.D., Stanford Law School, 2000; B.A., American University, 1996.; "NEW MEDIA, OLD PRINCIPLES: DIGITAL COMMUNICATION AND FREE SPEECH ON CAMPUS"; 5/13/2011; https://www.thefire.org/pdfs/e674c6c95dec401e5a62c9bbc409112c.pdf~~ JC |
|
68 |
+Further, the new visibility of speech offers opportunities for increased understanding and tolerance of |
|
69 |
+AND |
|
70 |
+we can begin to resolve the current tension regarding online speech on campus. |
|
71 |
+ |
|
72 |
+ |
|
73 |
+====The aff solves:==== |
|
74 |
+ |
|
75 |
+ |
|
76 |
+====1~~ Resisting surveillance in education causes a widespread culture shift==== |
|
77 |
+**Taylor 13** ~~Emmeline Taylor; "Surveillance Schools: Security, Discipline and Control in Contemporary Education" (Crime Prevention and Security Management); 2013~~ JC |
|
78 |
+Upcoming generations will emerge from Surveillance Schools desensitised to, and expectant of, intense |
|
79 |
+AND |
|
80 |
+social interaction and nowhere is the surveillance revolution more crystallised than in schools. |
|
81 |
+ |
|
82 |
+ |
|
83 |
+====2~~ Surveillance uniquely threatens students' freedoms. Criticizing and protesting surveillance both on campus and in debate is vital to civic engagement and social change. ==== |
|
84 |
+**Glaser 14** — April Glaser, Staff Activist at the Electronic Frontier Foundation, 2014 ("17 Student Groups Pen Open Letters on the Toxicity of Mass Surveillance to Academic Freedom," Electronic Frontier Foundation, June 9^^th^^, Available Online at https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2014/06/students-against-surveillance-17-university-groups-pen-open-letters-toxicity-mass) |
|
85 |
+Students are rising up and fighting to protect our Internet. In response to our |
|
86 |
+AND |
|
87 |
+, push for change, and put an end to mass government surveillance. |
|
88 |
+ |
|
89 |
+ |
|
90 |
+====Students are key – no one else will oppose surveillance. ==== |
|
91 |
+**Tempera 13** — Jackie Tempera, Summer USA Today Collegiate Correspondent, Journalism Student at Emerson College, 2013 ("Viewpoint: Where are the college students protesting NSA surveillance?," USA Today, June 19^^th^^, Available Online at http://college.usatoday.com/2013/06/19/opinion-where-are-the-college-students-protesting-nsa-surveillance/) |
|
92 |
+The college-age generation has been known as the protesters, the action takers |
|
93 |
+AND |
|
94 |
+For all I care, vehemently argue for it — just do something. |
|
95 |
+ |
|
96 |
+ |
|
97 |
+====3~~ The AFF's critical interrogation and analyses of surveillance is crucial to analyzing the way in which daily life and the body itself has become a feature of securitization—our dissent functions as an unravelling and exposure of dominant power relations ==== |
|
98 |
+**Giroux 14** Global TV Network Chair Professorship at McMaster University in the English and Cultural Studies Department and a Distinguished Visiting Professorship at Ryerson University ~~Henry, "Totalitarian Paranoia in the Post-Orwellian Surveillance State," Truthout, February 10, 2014, http://www.truth-out.org/opinion/item/21656-totalitarian-paranoia-in-the-post-orwellian-surveillance-state~~ |
|
99 |
+Totalitarian paranoia runs deep in American society, and it now inhabits the highest levels |
|
100 |
+AND |
|
101 |
+an educational endeavour and responsibility as it is a political and cultural task. |
|
102 |
+ |
|
103 |
+ |
|
104 |
+====Pedagogical praxis is key – translating critique into action is key to making education central in political effectiveness.==== |
|
105 |
+**Giroux 14** Global TV Network Chair Professorship at McMaster University in the English and Cultural Studies Department and a Distinguished Visiting Professorship at Ryerson University ~~Henry, "Totalitarian Paranoia in the Post-Orwellian Surveillance State," Truthout, February 10, 2014, http://www.truth-out.org/opinion/item/21656-totalitarian-paranoia-in-the-post-orwellian-surveillance-state~~ |
|
106 |
+Dissent is crucial to any viable notion of democracy and provides a powerful counterforce to |
|
107 |
+AND |
|
108 |
+most evident in the insults and patriotic gore heaped on Manning and Snowden. |