| ... |
... |
@@ -1,0
+1,40 @@ |
|
1 |
+Links |
|
2 |
+The impact claims of the affirmative present us with an opportunity to NOT act in the face of fear. This confronts us with dread and enables ontological grappling. |
|
3 |
+Thiele, 97, - Ph.D. department of politics at University of florida, Leslie Paul Thiele, “Postmodernity and the Routinization of Novelty: Heidegger on Boredom and Technology”, Polity, Vol. 29, No. 4 (Summer, 1997), pp. 489-517, jstor |
|
4 |
+ |
|
5 |
+The mood Heidegger...in such contemplation. |
|
6 |
+ |
|
7 |
+The affirmative’s snapshot of the world poses them as the subjects and the world as their object. This enframing mission makes the world the standing reserve and every part of it replaceable. |
|
8 |
+Mitchell, 5 - , Post-Doctoral Fellow in the Humanities at Stanford University (Andrew J, “Heidegger and Terrorism”, Research in Phenomenology, 35, http://www.technischedaten.com/view/mitchell-heidegger-and-terrorism-(2005)/45247219/207zwqqe8tjq9369ypv6/) |
|
9 |
+ |
|
10 |
+Opposition is no...standing-reserve collapses opposition |
|
11 |
+ |
|
12 |
+Working in Law is calculative thought |
|
13 |
+Callister ’07 Paul D. Associate Professor of Law and Director of the Leon E. Bloch Law Library, University of Missouri-Kansas City School of Law. The author thanks Elizabeth Bach-Van Horn, Richard Danner, James E. Faulconer, Erin Lavelle, Nancy Levit, Travis McDade, and Yelena Shmidova for their excellent assistance and encouragement. “Law and Heidegger’s Question Concerning Technology: Prolegomenon to Future Law Librarianship” http://www.aallnet.org/mm/Publications/llj/LLJ-Archives/Vol-99/pub_llj_v99n02/2007-17.pdf KO |
|
14 |
+ |
|
15 |
+Modern thinking about...station” been realized?¶ |
|
16 |
+ |
|
17 |
+All ethical systems are inherently calculative, ontologically bankrupt |
|
18 |
+McWhorter ’92 ableist language modified* – assistant professor of philosophy at Northeast Missouri State University (Ladelle, “Guilt As Management Technology”, Heidegger and The Earth: Essays in Environmental Philosophy) |
|
19 |
+ |
|
20 |
+It is probably...eventually is ourselves. |
|
21 |
+ |
|
22 |
+Impacts |
|
23 |
+Technological enframing is the root cause of all domination and war |
|
24 |
+Joronen, 2011 (Mikko, Dept. of Geography, U. of Turku, Finland, “Dwelling in the Sites of Finitude: Resisting the Violence of the Metaphysical Globe,” Antipode, 0(0).) |
|
25 |
+Although it is...is therefore needed. |
|
26 |
+ |
|
27 |
+Devastation of being is worse than annihilation – destroys the essence of all beings without any chance of salvation |
|
28 |
+Mitchell 05 – Associate Professor of Philosophy at Emory College and has a PhD from Stony Brook University (Andrew J., “Heidegger and Terrorism”, Research in Phenomenology, Vol 35, Pgs 181-218, 2005, Proquest) |
|
29 |
+This same reasoning...threat of being. |
|
30 |
+ |
|
31 |
+The alternative is to adopt meditative thought |
|
32 |
+Caputo, 78 ( John D., Ph.D., Bryn Mawr College, Professor of Religion and Humanities at Syracuse, 1978, A Mystical Element in Heidegger’s Thought, Pg. 215-216) |
|
33 |
+ |
|
34 |
+Moreover, just as...ancient Chinese masters. |
|
35 |
+ |
|
36 |
+ROB |
|
37 |
+ |
|
38 |
+The Question of Ontology Subsumes All Others—Resolving the Ontological Question of the Kritik Comes Before Whether or not the Affirmative is a Good Idea. |
|
39 |
+Dillon 99 (Michael Dillon, Political Theory, Vol. 27, No. 2, April 1999 pg. 145-147) |
|
40 |
+I take the...that very opening. |