| ... |
... |
@@ -1,9
+1,0 @@ |
| 1 |
|
-They can’t because their human rights framing is anthropocentric. |
| 2 |
|
-Burdon ’12 (Dr Peter is a Lecturer at the Adelaide Law School. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AND THE LIMITS OF RIGHTS TALK, Published August 10, 2012) |
| 3 |
|
- |
| 4 |
|
-Human rights discourse...explain environmental exploitation. |
| 5 |
|
- |
| 6 |
|
-Anthropocentrism is anti-ethical. This also turns their ‘arbitrariness’ standard. |
| 7 |
|
-Best ‘6 (Steven, Intl Journal of Inclusive Democracy, http://www.inclusivedemocracy.org/journal/vol2/vol2_no3_Best_rethinking_revolution_PRINTABLE.htm)JFS |
| 8 |
|
- |
| 9 |
|
-The next great...and universal justice. |