| ... |
... |
@@ -1,0
+1,55 @@ |
|
1 |
+Framework: Questions of ontology should be evaluated first. |
|
2 |
+Dillon 1999 (Dillon, Prof of Politics, University of Lancaster, Moral Spaces, p. 97-98)-mikee |
|
3 |
+ |
|
4 |
+Heirs to all...of decision making. |
|
5 |
+ |
|
6 |
+Ontology precedes ethics—we must know who we are before we can know how we must act, otherwise, our ethical rules repeat the errors of instrumentalism. |
|
7 |
+Antolick 2 Matthew Anolick; August 20, 2002; Deep Ecology and Heideggerian Phenomenology; MA University of Florida MV |
|
8 |
+ |
|
9 |
+Traditional ethics, as...the event ontology. |
|
10 |
+ |
|
11 |
+Nuclear power is dangerous and betrays humans, we can’t overcome its power |
|
12 |
+Kokubun Koichiro, Associate Professor Takasaki City University of Economics, Japan. “Philosophy in the Atomic Age” Web. 6 September 2016, file:///Users/kenzoakazaki/Downloads/Philosophy_in_the_Atomic_Age_why_is_nucl.pdf KO |
|
13 |
+ |
|
14 |
+Heidegger had great...overcome this power”. |
|
15 |
+ |
|
16 |
+Nuclear Power is a form of calculative thought and human mastery over nature, we don’t question our relations with it |
|
17 |
+Heidegger, 1955 Martin, Discourse on Thinking https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Martin_Heidegger#Marburg |
|
18 |
+What is the...capacity for decision. |
|
19 |
+ |
|
20 |
+Nuclear power production, and the drive for infinite energy, relies on a flawed ontological narrative of death. Moving away from the finite accelerates a production/consumption cycle that ends with a loss of humanity and nuclear winter. |
|
21 |
+Romanyshyn in 1989 (Robert D., Professor at the Pacifica Graduate Institute, Technology as Sympton and Dream, pp. 186-188)-mikee |
|
22 |
+ |
|
23 |
+Not only is...a nuclear winter. |
|
24 |
+The drive to develop tech without questioning our relationship with it changes the world into standing reserve. |
|
25 |
+Heidegger 49 Martin Heidegger, “The Question Concerning Technology”, December 1, 1949, http://www.wright.edu/cola/Dept/PHL/Class/P.Internet/PITexts/QCT.html, MV |
|
26 |
+ |
|
27 |
+Technology is a...a factory running. |
|
28 |
+ |
|
29 |
+We propose Ontological prohibition of the nuclear power. It bans the mindset of nuclear power production. |
|
30 |
+ |
|
31 |
+Management is impossible – you can’t control nature and you can’t trust nuclear power. Reject the utopian dream of technological control |
|
32 |
+McWhorter ‘92, Professor of Philosophy and Women's Studies Department of Philosophy University of Richmond, 92 LaDelle, Heidegger and the Earth: Essays in Environmental Ethics,) -mikee |
|
33 |
+What it most...never manage everything. |
|
34 |
+ |
|
35 |
+Dualistic thought cause mass environmental destruction |
|
36 |
+Zimmerman 93 ~-~- Professor of Philosophy at Tulane University (Michael, "Rethinking the Heidegger-Deep Ecology Relationship," ruby.fgcu.edu/courses/twimberley/envirophilo/zimmerman1.pdf) |
|
37 |
+Deep ecology argues...own self-realization. |
|
38 |
+ |
|
39 |
+Ontological alienation is the root cause of environmental devastation |
|
40 |
+Ratner 12 ~-~-- Louisiana State University, Bhatter College of Journalism (Dana, “The Environmental Impact of Nothing”, http://bcjms.bhattercollege.ac.in/tag/earth/) |
|
41 |
+In the article...would be nihilists. |
|
42 |
+ |
|
43 |
+Bad ontology is the root cause of environmental catastrophe |
|
44 |
+McEvoy, 2001 - Senior Lecturer in Systematic Theology at Catholic Theological College, Adelaide College of Divinity, and Flinders University (James, “Situating Humanity: Theological Anthropology in the Context of the Ecological Crisis,” Earth Revealing—Earth Healing: Ecology and Christian Theology, Google Books) |
|
45 |
+How is it...together lacked credibility. |
|
46 |
+ |
|
47 |
+These static and violent ontologies of the nuke power may seem benign, but each closure denies humanity and makes destruction of the Earth possible. Ontological damnation outweighs nuclear war. |
|
48 |
+Zimmerman in 1997 Michael, Contesting Earth's Future: Radical Ecology and Postmodernity, Berkeley, Calif. University of California Press, 1997. p.119-120 |
|
49 |
+ |
|
50 |
+George Sessions say...as material paradise. |
|
51 |
+ |
|
52 |
+D) Voting affirmative is a gesture against the need to manage, produce, control, and think calculatively using nuclear power. Only offering space for meditative thinking can challenge technological thought and open up more productive ontological possibilities. |
|
53 |
+McWhorter 92 (Ladelle, Professor of Philosophy and Women's Studies Department of Philosophy University of Richmond, “Guilt as Management Technology: A Call to Heideggerian Reflection,” Heidegger and the Earth, 1-9)-mikee |
|
54 |
+ |
|
55 |
+"Thinking today must...allowed to dissipate. |