| ... |
... |
@@ -1,42
+1,0 @@ |
| 1 |
|
-==1NC== |
| 2 |
|
- |
| 3 |
|
- |
| 4 |
|
-===CP=== |
| 5 |
|
- |
| 6 |
|
- |
| 7 |
|
-====CP text: The 50 States and all relevant territories, in cases of police officer misconduct, ought to (1) replace civil suits and thus qualified immunity with a state agency that will (2) revoke police officer certificates instead of creating a monetary punitive measure in every s tate that does not have it already and (3) create a data bank which would keep track of police officer misconduct, all in conjunction with the Federal Government. ==== |
| 8 |
|
-Goldman and Puro '01, ~~Goldman, Roger L., and Steven Puro. "Revocation of Police Officer Certification: A Viable Remedy for Police Misconduct?." Saint Louis University Law Journal 45 (2001): 541-579. SK~~ |
| 9 |
|
-Many of the states with the power to impose sanctions are doing so with increasing |
| 10 |
|
-AND |
| 11 |
|
-misconduct and should be adopted in those states without such a program. SK |
| 12 |
|
- |
| 13 |
|
- |
| 14 |
|
-====The net benefit is making sure that corrupt and abusive officers stay out of the system and don't perpetuate their misconduct in society. ==== |
| 15 |
|
-Goldman and Puro 2, ~~Goldman, Roger L., and Steven Puro. "Revocation of Police Officer Certification: A Viable Remedy for Police Misconduct?." Saint Louis University Law Journal 45 (2001): 541-579. SK~~ |
| 16 |
|
-Federal legislation should be introduced that would link the data currently collected by state POSTs |
| 17 |
|
-AND |
| 18 |
|
-must be rejected. |
| 19 |
|
-H. Competes through net benefits. |
| 20 |
|
- |
| 21 |
|
- |
| 22 |
|
-===DA=== |
| 23 |
|
- |
| 24 |
|
- |
| 25 |
|
-====The affirmative limits qualified immunity which inherently indoctrinates individuals within a system of civil litigation. Their belief in monetary compensation as a suitable form of justice re-entrenches the dominance of capitalism. Also turns the aff as those who are affected the most believe they are in power and are relegated even lower in the system when they can't afford attorneys. ==== |
| 26 |
|
-Higdon '10, ~~Woodrow L. Higdon (), PUBLIC-CORRUPTION-COVER-UP-THRU-CIVIL-LITIAGTION-ABUSE, No Publication, xx-xx-xxxx, xx, http://www.gtinewsphoto.com/PUBLIC-CORRUPTION-COVER-UP-THRU-CIVIL-LITIAGTION.html, 11-10-2016. SK~~ |
| 27 |
|
-The most effective "Public Corruption Cover Up Tool" available to public agencies, |
| 28 |
|
-AND |
| 29 |
|
-involved in the false prosecution, and false imprisonment of Cynthia Sommer. SK |
| 30 |
|
- |
| 31 |
|
- |
| 32 |
|
-===Preempts=== |
| 33 |
|
- |
| 34 |
|
- |
| 35 |
|
-====The 1AC's attempt to preemptively bracket out our criticism functions as a normalization of the doctrine of preemption—the impact is biopolitics and the destruction of the right to life==== |
| 36 |
|
-**Goh 6** (Irving, Harvard University and National University of Singapore, Disagreeing Preemptive/Prophylaxis: From Phillip K. Dick to Jacques Rancière, Fast Capitalism 2.1, http://www.uta.edu/huma/agger/fastcapitalism/2_1/goh.html) LA |
| 37 |
|
-1. In the world of Philip K. Dick's Minority Report (1956), |
| 38 |
|
-AND |
| 39 |
|
-. Preemptive bullets into the he |
| 40 |
|
-Link turns fairness |
| 41 |
|
-Engagement |
| 42 |
|
-Reciprocity |