| ... |
... |
@@ -1,0
+1,69 @@ |
|
1 |
+==1NC== |
|
2 |
+ |
|
3 |
+ |
|
4 |
+===CP=== |
|
5 |
+ |
|
6 |
+ |
|
7 |
+====CP text: The 50 States and all relevant territories, in cases of police officer misconduct, ought to (1) replace civil suits and thus qualified immunity with a state agency that will (2) revoke police officer certificates instead of creating a monetary punitive measure in every state that does not have it already and (3) create a data bank which would keep track of police officer misconduct, all in conjunction with the Federal Government. ==== |
|
8 |
+Goldman and Puro '01, ~~Goldman, Roger L., and Steven Puro. "Revocation of Police Officer Certification: A Viable Remedy for Police Misconduct?." Saint Louis University Law Journal 45 (2001): 541-579. SK~~ |
|
9 |
+Many of the states with the power to impose sanctions are doing so with increasing |
|
10 |
+AND |
|
11 |
+misconduct and should be adopted in those states without such a program. SK |
|
12 |
+ |
|
13 |
+ |
|
14 |
+====The net benefit is making sure that corrupt and abusive officers stay out of the system and don't perpetuate their misconduct in society. ==== |
|
15 |
+Goldman and Puro 2, ~~Goldman, Roger L., and Steven Puro. "Revocation of Police Officer Certification: A Viable Remedy for Police Misconduct?." Saint Louis University Law Journal 45 (2001): 541-579. SK~~ |
|
16 |
+Federal legislation should be introduced that would link the data currently collected by state POSTs |
|
17 |
+AND |
|
18 |
+the criminal justice system's procedural needs to how the people are affected by police |
|
19 |
+ |
|
20 |
+ |
|
21 |
+===DA=== |
|
22 |
+ |
|
23 |
+ |
|
24 |
+====The 1AC's intersection of critiquing institution and performing their resistance creates academic paralysis – the only solution for the researcher-debater is more criticism to fulfill a further rejection of other works as a means to academic legitimacy such as winning the ballot. These brings the 1AC into the greater neoliberal fold of ruling institutions, creating a form of individual decadence. ==== |
|
25 |
+Rita Felski, The Limits of Critique, 145-146, 2015 ~~Google Books~~ bcr |
|
26 |
+Robbins takes aim at this myth of the unattached critic, suggest- ing that |
|
27 |
+AND |
|
28 |
+ping-pong between moments of hubristic defiance and crestfallen de- spair. |
|
29 |
+ |
|
30 |
+ |
|
31 |
+====Performative decadence by debaters and researchers coopts and guts the laboratory potential of the movement they purport to uphold in exchange for academic advancement through the ballot. ==== |
|
32 |
+Frederick D. Miller, Waves of Protest: Social Movements Since the Sixties, 305-306, 1999 ~~Google Books~~ bcr |
|
33 |
+Co-optation strategies are brought into play when individual movement leaders are offered rewards |
|
34 |
+AND |
|
35 |
+activity in the interest of maintaining the organization and their position within it. |
|
36 |
+ |
|
37 |
+ |
|
38 |
+====The epistemological sequencing of the 1AC's framing makes a permutation impossible – Their form of knowing is an orthodoxy that eliminates the possibility of resistance and becomes its own disciplinary norm ==== |
|
39 |
+Rita Felski, The Limits of Critique, 148, 2015 ~~Google Books~~ bcr |
|
40 |
+Scott and Milne are in distinguished company; over the years, many scholars have swooped in to champion critique as the only way of carving out a space of freedom from forces pressing in from all sides. Appealing to Nietzsche and Marx as guiding lights, Paul Bove declares that a criticism that does not engage in rhetorical and institu- tional critique "is the worst sort of metaphysics." Those fail to practice this style of critique, he warns, render themselves useful to the domi- nant social order, though most "liberal educators and critics serve a function of which they are at best only partially aware."'" They are, not to put too fine a point on it, stooges of the status quo. Here again, we see the halo effect of critique, its radiant promise of political as well as intellectual legitimacy. In consequence, even those most disenchanted with critique seem unable, finally, to wriggle free of its grip. |
|
41 |
+ |
|
42 |
+ |
|
43 |
+ |
|
44 |
+===DA=== |
|
45 |
+ |
|
46 |
+ |
|
47 |
+====The affirmative limits qualified immunity which inherently indoctrinates individuals within a system of civil litigation. Their belief in monetary compensation as a suitable form of justice re-entrenches the dominance of capitalism. Also turns the aff as those who are affected the most believe they are in power and are relegated even lower in the system when they can't afford attorneys. ==== |
|
48 |
+Higdon '10, ~~Woodrow L. Higdon (), PUBLIC-CORRUPTION-COVER-UP-THRU-CIVIL-LITIAGTION-ABUSE, No Publication, xx-xx-xxxx, xx, http://www.gtinewsphoto.com/PUBLIC-CORRUPTION-COVER-UP-THRU-CIVIL-LITIAGTION.html, 11-10-2016. SK~~ |
|
49 |
+The most effective "Public Corruption Cover Up Tool" available to public agencies, |
|
50 |
+AND |
|
51 |
+involved in the false prosecution, and false imprisonment of Cynthia Sommer. SK |
|
52 |
+ |
|
53 |
+ |
|
54 |
+ |
|
55 |
+===Case=== |
|
56 |
+ |
|
57 |
+ |
|
58 |
+====Normal means is indemnifications which doesn't solve, and officers already are convicted which takes out uniqueness. ==== |
|
59 |
+Schwartz '14, ~~Joann Schwartz, 2014, Police Idemnification, New York University Law Review, June 2014, http://www.nyulawreview.org/sites/default/files/pdf/NYULawReview-89-3-Schwartz.pdf~~ |
|
60 |
+I found that indemnification of officers is virtually certain and universal. During the six |
|
61 |
+AND |
|
62 |
+Albuquerque assumed those costs, indemnified the officer for those punitive damages. SK |
|
63 |
+ |
|
64 |
+ |
|
65 |
+====Turn — If QI is eliminated, it will be more difficult for plaintiffs to win claims and there will be even more idemnification==== |
|
66 |
+Joann Schwartz, 2014, Police Idemnification, New York University Law Review, June 2014, http://www.nyulawreview.org/sites/default/files/pdf/NYULawReview-89-3-Schwartz.pdf , Joanna Schwartz is a Professor of Law at UCLA School of Law. She teaches Civil Procedure, the Civil Rights Litigation Clinic, and a variety of courses on police accountability and public interest lawyering. In 2015, she received UCLA's Distinguished Teaching Award. Professor Schwartz is one of the country's leading experts on police misconduct litigation. Her studies examine the frequency with which police departments gather and analyze information from lawsuits, and the ways in which litigation-attentive departments use lawsuit data to reduce the likelihood of future harms. She has also examined the financial effects of police misconduct litigation, including the frequency with which police officers contribute to settlements and judgments in police misconduct cases, and the extent to which police department budgets are affected by litigation costs. Professor Schwartz has also looked more broadly at how lawsuits influence decision-making in hospitals, airlines, and other organizational settings. Professor Schwartz additionally studies the dynamics of modern civil litigation. Recent scholarship examines the degree to which litigation costs and delays necessitate current civil procedure rules, and compares rhetoric with available evidence about the costs and burdens of class action litigation. She is co-author, with Stephen Yeazell, of a leading casebook, Civil Procedure (9th Edition). Professor Schwartz is a graduate of Brown University and Yale Law School. She was awarded the Francis Wayland Prize for her work in Yale Law School's Prison Legal Services clinic. After law school, Professor Schwartz clerked for Judge Denise Cote of the Southern District of New York and Judge Harry Pregerson of the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals. She was then associated with Emery Celli Brinckerhoff and Abady LLP, in New York City, where she specialized in police misconduct, prisoners' rights, and First Amendment litigation. She was awarded the New York City Legal Aid Society's Pro Bono Publico Award for her work as co-counsel representing a class of inmates challenging conditions at Rikers Island. Immediately prior to her appointment, Professor Schwartz was the Binder Clinical Teaching Fellow at UCLA School of Law. |
|
67 |
+Any prescriptions should also be made with the understanding that modifications to one area of |
|
68 |
+AND |
|
69 |
+an effort to discourage weak suits or indemnify fewer officers to reduce costs. |