Summary

• Objects (1 modified, 1 added, 0 removed)
  • Caselist.RoundClass[14]
  • Caselist.CitesClass[10]

Details

Caselist.RoundClass[14]

EntryDate

...	...	@@ -1,1 +1,1 @@
1		-2017-03-05 01:46:07.961
	1	+2017-03-05 01:46:07.0

Caselist.CitesClass[10]

Cites

...	...	@@ -1,0 +1,76 @@
	1	+=Rousseau=
	2	+
	3	+==1AC==
	4	+
	5	+===Part 1 is the Framework===
	6	+
	7	+====~~Rousseau 1~~ The value of human freedom is a precondition to all other values, because the act of valuing itself presupposes freedom and thus principles of consistency necessitate reflexive endorsement. The sphere of the state is derived from the constitutive force of agreement from the general will of the population. Such conceptions stem from the natural value of human freedom. Rousseau^^ ^^====
	8	+I SUPPOSE men to have reached the point at which the obstacles in the way of their preservation in the state of nature show
	9	+AND
	10	+absurd, tyrannical, and liable to the most frightful abuse.
	11	+
	12	+
	13	+==== ~~Rousseau 2~~ If the sovereign does not respect the general will, then they exert power over and above the citizenry and the contract dissolves since something other than the collective contract would govern state action. Rousseau 2^^ ^^====
	14	+I WARN the reader that this chapter requires careful reading
	15	+AND
	16	+the body politic would be dissolved.
	17	+
	18	+
	19	+==== ~~Standard~~ The standard is consistency with deliberative democracy. This differs from other social contracts by locating the grounding contract not between the sovereign and the people since the two are not distinct entities, but among the people themselves to construct a legitimate sovereign in which everyone is included. Prefer because the AC provides an ontological account of the nation. It precedes ethical claims because unless we know what the nation is, we cannot know what its obligations could be. A few implications:====
	20	+The standard is strictly procedural, meaning it focuses on creating the institutional framework that allows healthy civil society via deliberation—an action that violates the framework for some future net benefit would undermine its justification for existence. The framework is not a question of following what people want, but the procedural method to ensure that everyone’s voices are heard—you can’t promote an end state through procedurally illegitimate means.
	21	+Public institutions are the only legitimate locus of coercive force because only they can hope
	22	+AND
	23	+subvert the general will for particular ends, which is inconsistent with society.
	24	+
	25	+
	26	+===Part 2 is Speech===
	27	+
	28	+
	29	+====~~Maloney 16~~ Hence, colleges and universities ought not restrict any form of constitutionally protected speech because speech is key to the procedural inclusion of voices and upholding a deliberative democracy. Maloney^^ ^^ ‘16====
	30	+In grade school, I learned that debate is defined as "a discussion between people in which they express different opinions about something."
	31	+AND
	32	+not just on college campuses, but everywhere in America.
	33	+
	34	+
	35	+==== ~~Wainberg 15~~ To clarify, speech that produces a clear and imminent danger is considered unconstitutional. Wainberg 15====
	36	+~~Joshua Waimberg 15, is a legal fellow at the National Constitution Center., 11-2-2015, "Schenck v. United States: Defining the limits of free speech," Constitution Daily, a href="http://blog.constitutioncenter.org/2015/11/schenck-v-united-states-defining-the-limits-of-free-speech/"http://blog.constitutioncenter.org/2015/11/schenck-v-united-states-defining-the-limits-of-free-speech//a~~
	37	+This quote, while famous for its analogy, also gave the Court a pragmatic
	38	+AND
	39	+both Chelsea Manning and Edward Snowden have also been charged under the Act.
	40	+
	41	+
	42	+==== ~~Lawrence~~ Impacts of speech are instantaneous and have no recourse. Lawrence====
	43	+~~Lawrence, C. R. (1990). If He Hollers Let Him Go: Regulating Racist Speech on Campus. Duke Law Journal, 1990(3), 431. doi:10.2307/1372554~~
	44	+This regulation and others like it have been characterized in the press as the work
	45	+AND
	46	+of response until well after the assault when the cowardly assaulter has departed.
	47	+
	48	+
	49	+==== ~~Lawrence 2~~ Hate speech excludes. Lawrence 2====
	50	+A second factor that distinguishes racial insults from protected
	51	+AND
	52	+pervasive racial and sexual violence and coercion on individual
	53	+
	54	+
	55	+==== ~~Jones et al. 09~~ And, post fiat policy requires free speech. The Aff is a prerequisite to Neg restrictions or alternatives. Jones et al. 09====
	56	+~~Jones et Al. 09 Nicola Jones, Ajoy Datta and Harry Jones. "Knowledge, policy and power Six dimensions of the knowledge– development policy interface." Overseas Development Institute~~
	57	+At the knowledge generation end of the ‘funnel’, IS approaches to policymaking emphasise
	58	+AND
	59	+ways in which new knowledge can empower end users (see Box 8).
	60	+
	61	+
	62	+==== ~~Hooks~~ Endorsing restrictions ignores that exclusive educational norms are the root cause of disempowerment. The aff’s method of inclusion is key to solving. Hooks^^ ^^====
	63	+Many of our colleagues were initially reluctant
	64	+AND
	65	+conventional ways of critically approaching a novel could not coexist in classrooms that also offered new perspectives.
	66	+
	67	+
	68	+==== ~~Woodman 16~~ And, restrictions won’t work; they will only rally the alt right. The rhetoric and logic of liberal movements has couched the advancement of the radical right. Woodman 16====
	69	+~~Zachary Woodman 16, 11-29-2016, "Identity Politics, the Alt-Right, and Empathy in Cultural Discourse," Notes On Liberty, a href="https://notesonliberty.com/2016/11/29/identity-politics-the-alt-right-and-empathy-in-cultural-discourse/"https://notesonliberty.com/2016/11/29/identity-politics-the-alt-right-and-empathy-in-cultural-discourse//a~~
	70	+Indeed, this type of rhetoric is at the heart of the rise of the
	71	+AND
	72	+progressives through the more pop-culture current of the gay rights movement.
	73	+
	74	+
	75	+===Part 3 is the Underview 1===
	76	+===Part 4 is the Underview 2===

EntryDate

...	...	@@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
	1	+2017-03-05 01:46:09.950

Judge

...	...	@@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
	1	+Any

Opponent

...	...	@@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
	1	+Any

ParentRound

...	...	@@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
	1	+14

Round

...	...	@@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
	1	+1

Team

...	...	@@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
	1	+Quarry Lane Karavadi Aff

Title

...	...	@@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
	1	+Rousseau AC

Tournament

...	...	@@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
	1	+ANy