| ... |
... |
@@ -1,20
+1,0 @@ |
| 1 |
|
-Progress is only possible by first accounting for the original sin of the U.S. nation state, the failure to engage the subject of the Indigenous homeland as a first priority is a strategic silence |
| 2 |
|
- |
| 3 |
|
-Churchill 96 |
| 4 |
|
- |
| 5 |
|
-WARD CHURCHILL, FORMER PROFESSOR OF ETHNIC STUDIES AT UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO, BOULDER 1996 “I AM INDIGENIST,” FROM A NATIVE SON PGS 520-30 |
| 6 |
|
- |
| 7 |
|
-The law is inherently Eurocentric and the appearance of legality is used to disguise the colonialist intentions of the plan. |
| 8 |
|
- |
| 9 |
|
-Kenneth B. Nunn, prof. of law, University of Florida School of Law, in 1997 “Law as a Eurocentric Enterprise,” Law and Inequality, Spring, p. lexis |
| 10 |
|
- |
| 11 |
|
-Coloniality naturalizes a non-ethics of death and generalizes the condition of damnation—ongoing genocide, enslavement, rape, ecological destruction and unending war is produced by and reproduces colonial epistemologies. |
| 12 |
|
- |
| 13 |
|
-Maldonado-Torres 2008 Nelson. “Against War : Views from the Underside of Modernity”¶ Durham, NC, USA: Duke University Press, 2008. p 215-217¶ http://site.ebrary.com/lib/utexas/Doc?id=10217191andppg=52 |
| 14 |
|
- |
| 15 |
|
-The alternative is to reject the right of the U.S. nation state to cooperate with Indigenous tribes and let Indigenous people decide what happens to their own land – the role of the ballot is to endorse the best strategy for overthrowing oppression of Native American tribes |
| 16 |
|
- |
| 17 |
|
- |
| 18 |
|
-Churchill 96 |
| 19 |
|
- |
| 20 |
|
-WARD CHURCHILL, FORMER PROFESSOR OF ETHNIC STUDIES AT UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO, BOULDER 1996 “I AM INDIGENIST,” FROM A NATIVE SON PGS 89-94 |