| ... |
... |
@@ -1,0
+1,37 @@ |
|
1 |
+I value governmental obligation. According to the first definition of its entry in the Random-House Dictionary, ought is (auxiliary verb) 1. used to express duty or moral obligation: Every citizen ought to help. |
|
2 |
+Prefer this definition on common usage. The Online Etymology Dictionary: ought (v.) Old AND the past subjunctive. |
|
3 |
+ |
|
4 |
+Obligations that bind the United States cannot stem from traditional ethical theories. Four warrants. |
|
5 |
+ANALYTICS |
|
6 |
+ |
|
7 |
+Thus, the United States can only be obligated by a body that it has consented to and which has constitutive authority over it. The only entity with normative force is the Constitution. Six warrants. |
|
8 |
+ANALYTICS |
|
9 |
+ |
|
10 |
+Thus, the value criterion is minimizing violations of the United States Constitution. |
|
11 |
+ |
|
12 |
+Plan Text: The United States ought to abolish qualified immunity for police officers. |
|
13 |
+ |
|
14 |
+This will cause insurance and indemnification programs to fill the void. Kirby ’89 Qualified Immunity for Civil Rights Violations: Refining the Standard. Cornell L. Rev., 75, 461. Retrieved from http://heinonline.org/hol-cgi-bin/get_pdf.cgi?handle=hein.journals/clqv75andsection=23. (former Assistant United States Attorney) |
|
15 |
+The most sweeping AND the first place |
|
16 |
+ |
|
17 |
+Advantage One is Gray Areas |
|
18 |
+Because of qualified immunity, the Constitution is not being clarified and advanced. |
|
19 |
+Black ’90 Black, H. A. (1990). Balance, Band-Aid, or Tourniquet: The Illusion of Qualified Immunity for Federal Officials. Wm. and Mary L. Rev., 32, 733. Retrieved from http://heinonline.org/hol-cgi-bin/get_pdf.cgi?handle=hein.journals/wmlr32andsection=25 (Professor of Law at University of Baltimore School of Law). |
|
20 |
+Inhibition of Constitutional AND protecting constitutional rights |
|
21 |
+ |
|
22 |
+However, police liability insurance promotes constitutional advancement. Rappaport ’16 Rappaport, J. (2016 II). How Private Insurers Regulate Public Police. U of Chicago, Public Law Working Paper, (562). Retrieved from http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2733783 (Assistant Professor of Law, The University of Chicago Law School). |
|
23 |
+Second, and closely AND rules are broken |
|
24 |
+ |
|
25 |
+Advantage Two is Police Accountability |
|
26 |
+First, use of insurance companies reforms police conduct by forcing them to follow the constitution. |
|
27 |
+Rappaport ’16 Ibid. |
|
28 |
+There can be AND point still holds |
|
29 |
+ |
|
30 |
+And, implementation of insurance policies deters constitutional violations far better than qualified immunity can. |
|
31 |
+Abraham ‘09 Rappaport, J. (2016 II). How Private Insurers Regulate Public Police. U of Chicago, Public Law Working Paper, (562). Retrieved from http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2733783 (Assistant Professor of Law, The University of Chicago Law School). |
|
32 |
+Conversely, a version AND sick or injured |
|
33 |
+ |
|
34 |
+The Underview |
|
35 |
+Don’t evaluate theoretical violations if they are unchecked in cross-examination ANALYTIC |
|
36 |
+Err aff by giving me choice over theoretical paradigm issues such as but not limited to RVIs, drop the debater versus drop the arg and competing interps and reasonability ANALYTIC |
|
37 |
+Don’t evaluate any 2NR weighing arguments on the procedural layer of the flow ANALYTIC |