Changes for page Pittsburgh Central Catholic Sipe Neg
Summary
-
Objects (0 modified, 2 added, 0 removed)
Details
- Caselist.CitesClass[6]
-
- Cites
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,15 @@ 1 +Framing 2 + 3 +The standard is utilitarianism. 4 + 5 +Utilitarianism is the only moral framework and alternatives are contradictory 6 +Nye, 86 (Joseph S. 1986; Phd Political Science Harvard. University; Served as Assistant Secretary of Defense for International Security Affairs; “Nuclear Ethics” pg. 18-19) 7 +The significance and the limits of the two broad traditions can be captured by contemplating 8 +AND 9 +bear a heavier burden of proof in the nuclear age than ever before. 10 + 11 +We must choose the lesser evil. Utilitarianism limits further atrocities against civilization. 12 +Issac 02 – Professor of political science at Indiana-Bloomington, Director of the Center for the Study of Democracy and Public Life, PhD from Yale (Jeffery C., Dissent Magazine, Vol. 49, Iss. 2, “Ends, Means, and Politics,” p. Proquest) 13 +WHAT WOULD IT mean for the American left right now to take seriously the centrality 14 +AND 15 +far as personal ethics are concerned (Goodin, 1995: 11).iii - EntryDate
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +2016-12-03 04:25:59.0 - Judge
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +Chris Quiroz - Opponent
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +Stuyvesant AS - ParentRound
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +2 - Round
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +1 - Team
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +Pittsburgh Central Catholic Sipe Neg - Title
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +Framing- Util - Tournament
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +Princeton
- Caselist.CitesClass[7]
-
- Cites
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,12 @@ 1 +Legitimacy DA 2 +Overrules hurt court legitimacy – perception is key. Idleman 95 3 + (Scott, Assistant professor at Marquette Law, ARTICLE: A Prudential Theory of Judicial Candor, Texas Law Review, May 1995, 73 Tex. L. Rev. 1307, lexis) 4 +The third and final competing value under the heading of institutional legitimacy is continuity, 5 +AND 6 +with ambivalence; we respect legitimacy, but celebrate greatness. 2 9 7 7 + 8 +Decades of court decisions affirm qualified immunity – the aff would overrule years of precedence. 9 +Schwartz, Martin. "Supreme Court Fortifies Qualified Immunity for Law Enforcement Officers in Warrant Cases." Digitalcommons.com. Touro Law, 2013.. 10 +The United States Supreme Court in Messerschmidt v. Millender5 held that police offi cers 11 +AND 12 +only if the offi cer violated the plaintiff’s clearly established Fourth Amendment rights. - EntryDate
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +2016-12-03 04:25:59.0 - Judge
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +Chris Quiroz - Opponent
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +Stuyvesant AS - ParentRound
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +2 - Round
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +1 - Team
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +Pittsburgh Central Catholic Sipe Neg - Title
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +Legitimacy DA - Tournament
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +Princeton