Changes for page Pittsburgh Central Catholic Sipe Neg
Summary
-
Objects (0 modified, 0 added, 2 removed)
Details
- Caselist.CitesClass[6]
-
- Cites
-
... ... @@ -1,15 +1,0 @@ 1 -Framing 2 - 3 -The standard is utilitarianism. 4 - 5 -Utilitarianism is the only moral framework and alternatives are contradictory 6 -Nye, 86 (Joseph S. 1986; Phd Political Science Harvard. University; Served as Assistant Secretary of Defense for International Security Affairs; “Nuclear Ethics” pg. 18-19) 7 -The significance and the limits of the two broad traditions can be captured by contemplating 8 -AND 9 -bear a heavier burden of proof in the nuclear age than ever before. 10 - 11 -We must choose the lesser evil. Utilitarianism limits further atrocities against civilization. 12 -Issac 02 – Professor of political science at Indiana-Bloomington, Director of the Center for the Study of Democracy and Public Life, PhD from Yale (Jeffery C., Dissent Magazine, Vol. 49, Iss. 2, “Ends, Means, and Politics,” p. Proquest) 13 -WHAT WOULD IT mean for the American left right now to take seriously the centrality 14 -AND 15 -far as personal ethics are concerned (Goodin, 1995: 11).iii - EntryDate
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -2016-12-03 04:25:59.0 - Judge
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -Chris Quiroz - Opponent
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -Stuyvesant AS - ParentRound
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -2 - Round
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -1 - Team
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -Pittsburgh Central Catholic Sipe Neg - Title
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -Framing- Util - Tournament
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -Princeton
- Caselist.CitesClass[7]
-
- Cites
-
... ... @@ -1,12 +1,0 @@ 1 -Legitimacy DA 2 -Overrules hurt court legitimacy – perception is key. Idleman 95 3 - (Scott, Assistant professor at Marquette Law, ARTICLE: A Prudential Theory of Judicial Candor, Texas Law Review, May 1995, 73 Tex. L. Rev. 1307, lexis) 4 -The third and final competing value under the heading of institutional legitimacy is continuity, 5 -AND 6 -with ambivalence; we respect legitimacy, but celebrate greatness. 2 9 7 7 - 8 -Decades of court decisions affirm qualified immunity – the aff would overrule years of precedence. 9 -Schwartz, Martin. "Supreme Court Fortifies Qualified Immunity for Law Enforcement Officers in Warrant Cases." Digitalcommons.com. Touro Law, 2013.. 10 -The United States Supreme Court in Messerschmidt v. Millender5 held that police offi cers 11 -AND 12 -only if the offi cer violated the plaintiff’s clearly established Fourth Amendment rights. - EntryDate
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -2016-12-03 04:25:59.0 - Judge
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -Chris Quiroz - Opponent
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -Stuyvesant AS - ParentRound
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -2 - Round
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -1 - Team
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -Pittsburgh Central Catholic Sipe Neg - Title
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -Legitimacy DA - Tournament
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -Princeton