| ... |
... |
@@ -1,27
+1,0 @@ |
| 1 |
|
-Congress CP |
| 2 |
|
- |
| 3 |
|
-Text: Congress should do the aff. |
| 4 |
|
- |
| 5 |
|
-CP solves – Congress can amend the relevant statute instead of waiting for the courts. |
| 6 |
|
-Lynda G. Dodd 15, Joseph H. Flom Professor of Legal Studies and Political Science at The City University of New York–City College, writing a book examining the Supreme Court’s development of the legal framework for Section 1983 litigation., 10-19-2015, "What's missing in the police reform debate? (Part 1)," Balkinization, https://balkin.blogspot.com/2015/10/whats-missing-in-police-reform-debate.html |
| 7 |
|
-Because these doctrines were crafted by the Supreme Court, it may at first seem |
| 8 |
|
-AND |
| 9 |
|
-find any proposals by legal scholars elaborating this kind of significant statutory reform. |
| 10 |
|
- |
| 11 |
|
-Speed NB |
| 12 |
|
- |
| 13 |
|
-The Court takes years to act, whereas Congress can implement the plan now – all their advantages become linear disads vs the counterplan. |
| 14 |
|
- |
| 15 |
|
-Ornstein et al 11 – Continuity of Government Commission made up of Norman J. Ornstein political scientist and resident scholar at the American Enterprise Institute, Thomas E. Mann Averell Harriman Chair and a senior fellow in Governance Studies at the Brookings Institution, John C. Fortier research fellow at AEI, and Jennifer K. Marsico AEI, 2011, “Preserving Our Institutions: The Third Report of the Continuity of Government Commission-The Supreme Court.” American Enterprise Institute, https://www.aei.org/wp-content/uploads/2011/10/Supreme-Court-Continuity.pdf |
| 16 |
|
-First, in ordinary times the Court does not typically move on a quick timetable |
| 17 |
|
-AND |
| 18 |
|
-8 and older cases dealing with military commissions were decided years after initial detainment |
| 19 |
|
- |
| 20 |
|
-Culture Shift NB |
| 21 |
|
- |
| 22 |
|
- |
| 23 |
|
-And, only Congressional Action sends the message that spurs social changes, Supreme Court decision fail |
| 24 |
|
-Stoddard, prof law NYU, 97 |
| 25 |
|
- |
| 26 |
|
-(Thomas B. Stoddard, Former Professor of Law at NYU Law School, November 1997, New York University Law Review, “Bleeding Heart: Reflection on Using Law to Make Social Change,” pg. 7, http://law.ubalt.edu/law/downloads/law_downloads/Stoddard.pdf) Dan Li |
| 27 |
|
-Let me also suggest this… what is, in the end, done. |