Changes for page Phoenix Country Day Whitfil Neg
Summary
-
Objects (1 modified, 5 added, 8 removed)
- Caselist.CitesClass[104]
- Caselist.CitesClass[106]
- Caselist.CitesClass[107]
- Caselist.RoundClass[103]
- Caselist.RoundClass[104]
- Caselist.RoundClass[105]
- Caselist.RoundClass[106]
- Caselist.RoundClass[107]
- Caselist.RoundClass[108]
- Caselist.CitesClass[97]
- Caselist.CitesClass[99]
- Caselist.CitesClass[103]
- Caselist.RoundClass[81]
- Caselist.RoundClass[95]
Details
- Caselist.CitesClass[104]
-
- Cites
-
... ... @@ -1,18 +1,0 @@ 1 -1. RVIs must be bidrectional 2 -2. Normative ethic required 3 -3. If they claim RVIs in the 1ac, must spec conditions of RVI 4 -4. 1AC Spikes need to be fully fleshed out (voter, violations, paradigm issues) 5 -5. Not reading stupid spikes like neg may only have one unconditional route to the ballot 6 -6. Skep triggers bad 7 -7. NIBs bad/A prioris Bad 8 -8. Descriptive frameworks (like polls) bad 9 -9. Flash, email chain, print, or lose 10 -10. Disclose at least first 3 last 3, tags, and advocacy text(s) in a clear and easy to follow manner within 1 hour post debate 11 -Must disclose aff 30 mins before round (if broken) 12 -12. The affirmative must specify what constitutionally protected speech they defend in an explicit advocacy text in 1AC. 13 -13. Hidden A prioris bad 14 -14. Must know methodologies of studies (sample size, scope, etc) 15 -15. Miscutting Ev Bad 16 -16. O- Spec Bad 17 -17. Intrinsic Perms Bad 18 -18. If you read presumption in the aff, must spec conditions it is relevant. - EntryDate
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -2017-04-18 21:28:03.0 - Judge
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -x - Opponent
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -x - ParentRound
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -104 - Round
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -9 - Team
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -Phoenix Country Day Whitfil Neg - Title
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -0- Neg Theory Interps - Tournament
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -All
- Caselist.CitesClass[106]
-
- Cites
-
... ... @@ -1,21 +1,0 @@ 1 -RVIs must be bidrectional 2 -2. Normative ethic required 3 -3. If they claim RVIs in the 1ac, must spec conditions of RVI 4 -4. 1AC Spikes need to be fully fleshed out (voter, violations, paradigm issues) 5 -5. Not reading stupid spikes like neg may only have one unconditional route to the ballot 6 -6. Skep triggers bad 7 -7. NIBs bad/A prioris Bad 8 -8. Descriptive frameworks (like polls) bad 9 -9. Flash, email chain, print, or lose 10 -10. Disclose at least first 3 last 3, tags, and advocacy text(s) in a clear and easy to follow manner within 1 hour post debate 11 -Must disclose aff 30 mins before round (if broken) 12 -12. The affirmative must specify what constitutionally protected speech they defend in an explicit advocacy text in 1AC. 13 -13. Hidden A prioris bad 14 -14. Must know methodologies of studies (sample size, scope, etc) 15 -15. Miscutting Ev Bad 16 -16. O- Spec Bad 17 -17. Intrinsic Perms Bad 18 -18. If you read presumption in the aff, must spec conditions it is relevant. 19 -19. Must disclose round reports for every round describing each off 20 - 21 -Exact text is syntehtic to round often, msg me if you want them - EntryDate
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -2017-04-29 11:29:10.0 - Judge
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -x - Opponent
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -x - ParentRound
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -106 - Round
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -9 - Team
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -Phoenix Country Day Whitfil Neg - Title
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -0- 1NC Theory Interps - Tournament
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -All
- Caselist.CitesClass[107]
-
- Cites
-
... ... @@ -1,8 +1,0 @@ 1 -A. interp: miscuts bad 2 - 3 -B. 4 - 5 -C. strawmanning- Mankins doesn’t advocate for intrinsicness perms. He thinks they are a terrible idea. This ev is strawmanned 6 - 7 -Mankins 84, Michael Mankins, University of Kentucky coach, “Broken Beyond Repair Intrinsicness: Theory Headed for Collision” 1984 - Waging War on Poverty WFU Debater's Research Guide 8 -The concept of intrinsicness, …. dated and impractical. - EntryDate
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -2017-04-29 17:19:14.437 - Judge
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -Sam Azbel - Opponent
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -Oliver Sussman - ParentRound
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -108 - Round
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -2 - Team
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -Phoenix Country Day Whitfil Neg - Title
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -0- Mankins is miscut - Tournament
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -TOC
- Caselist.RoundClass[103]
-
- Cites
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -103
- Caselist.RoundClass[104]
-
- Cites
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -104 - EntryDate
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -2017-04-18 21:28:01.0 - Judge
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -x - Opponent
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -x - Round
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -9 - Tournament
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -All
- Caselist.RoundClass[105]
-
- Cites
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -105 - EntryDate
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -2017-04-29 11:28:57.0 - Judge
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -x - Opponent
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -x - Round
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -9 - Tournament
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -All
- Caselist.RoundClass[106]
-
- Cites
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -106 - EntryDate
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -2017-04-29 11:29:09.0 - Judge
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -x - Opponent
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -x - Round
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -9 - Tournament
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -All
- Caselist.RoundClass[107]
-
- EntryDate
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -2017-04-29 17:17:34.0 - Judge
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -Sam Azbel - Opponent
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -Oliver Sussman - Round
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -2 - RoundReport
-
... ... @@ -1,5 +1,0 @@ 1 -1AC- Testimonies 2 -1NC- Theory Pope Francis Da Case 3 -1AR- New 1AR Theory 1NC theory Case Pope Francis 4 -2NR- 1NC Theory 1AR Theory 5 -2AR- 1NC Theory - Tournament
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -TOC
- Caselist.RoundClass[108]
-
- EntryDate
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -2017-04-29 17:19:11.0 - Judge
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -Sam Azbel - Opponent
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -Oliver Sussman - Round
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -2 - Tournament
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -TOC
- Caselist.CitesClass[97]
-
- Cites
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,17 @@ 1 +RVIs must be bidrectional 2 +2. Normative ethic required 3 +3. ROTB spec 4 +4. 1AC Spikes need to be fully fleshed out (voter, violations, paradigm issues) 5 +5. Not reading stupid spikes like neg may only have one unconditional route to the ballot 6 +6. Skep triggers bad 7 +7. NIBs bad/A prioris Bad 8 +8. Descriptive frameworks (like polls) bad 9 +9. Flash, email chain, print, or lose 10 +10. Disclose at least first 3 last 3, tags, and advocacy text(s) in a clear and easy to follow manner within 1 hour post debate 11 +Must disclose plan-text at least 24 hours before the round. 12 +12. The affirmative must specify what constitutionally protected speech they defend in an explicit advocacy text in 1AC. 13 +13. Hidden A prioris bad 14 +14. Must know methodologies of studies (sample size, scope, etc) 15 +15. Miscutting Ev Bad 16 +16. O- Spec 17 +17. Intrinsic Perms Bad - EntryDate
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +2017-02-25 01:14:11.0 - Judge
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +x - Opponent
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +x - ParentRound
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +95 - Round
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +9 - Team
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +Phoenix Country Day Whitfil Neg - Title
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +0- Neg Theory Interps - Tournament
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +All
- Caselist.CitesClass[99]
-
- Cites
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,17 @@ 1 +1. RVIs must be bidrectional 2 +2. Normative ethic required 3 +3. If they claim RVIs in the 1ac, must spec conditions of RVI 4 +4. 1AC Spikes need to be fully fleshed out (voter, violations, paradigm issues) 5 +5. Not reading stupid spikes like neg may only have one unconditional route to the ballot 6 +6. Skep triggers bad 7 +7. NIBs bad/A prioris Bad 8 +8. Descriptive frameworks (like polls) bad 9 +9. Flash, email chain, print, or lose 10 +10. Disclose at least first 3 last 3, tags, and advocacy text(s) in a clear and easy to follow manner within 1 hour post debate 11 +11. Must disclose aff 30 mins before round (if broken) 12 +12. The affirmative must specify what constitutionally protected speech they defend in an explicit advocacy text in 1AC. 13 +13. Hidden A prioris bad 14 +14. Must know methodologies of studies (sample size, scope, etc) 15 +15. Miscutting Ev Bad 16 +16. O- Spec Bad 17 +17. Intrinsic Perms Bad - EntryDate
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +2017-04-12 20:36:33.0 - Judge
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +x - Opponent
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +x - ParentRound
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +98 - Round
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +9 - Team
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +Phoenix Country Day Whitfil Neg - Title
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +0- Neg Theory Interps - Tournament
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +All
- Caselist.CitesClass[103]
-
- Cites
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,18 @@ 1 +1. RVIs must be bidrectional 2 +2. Normative ethic required 3 +3. If they claim RVIs in the 1ac, must spec conditions of RVI 4 +4. 1AC Spikes need to be fully fleshed out (voter, violations, paradigm issues) 5 +5. Not reading stupid spikes like neg may only have one unconditional route to the ballot 6 +6. Skep triggers bad 7 +7. NIBs bad/A prioris Bad 8 +8. Descriptive frameworks (like polls) bad 9 +9. Flash, email chain, print, or lose 10 +10. Disclose at least first 3 last 3, tags, and advocacy text(s) in a clear and easy to follow manner within 1 hour post debate 11 +Must disclose aff 30 mins before round (if broken) 12 +12. The affirmative must specify what constitutionally protected speech they defend in an explicit advocacy text in 1AC. 13 +13. Hidden A prioris bad 14 +14. Must know methodologies of studies (sample size, scope, etc) 15 +15. Miscutting Ev Bad 16 +16. O- Spec Bad 17 +17. Intrinsic Perms Bad 18 +18. If you read presumption in the aff, must spec conditions it is relevant. - EntryDate
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +2017-04-18 21:27:35.181 - Judge
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +x - Opponent
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +x - ParentRound
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +103 - Round
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +9 - Team
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +Phoenix Country Day Whitfil Neg - Title
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +Neg Theory Interps - Tournament
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +All
- Caselist.RoundClass[81]
-
- Cites
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +94 - EntryDate
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +2017-02-25 00:28:15.0 - Judge
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +x - Opponent
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +x - Round
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +9 - Tournament
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +All
- Caselist.RoundClass[95]
-
- Cites
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +97 - EntryDate
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +2017-02-25 01:14:09.0 - Judge
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +x - Opponent
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +x - Round
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +9 - Tournament
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +All