Changes for page Phoenix Country Day Whitfil Neg
Summary
-
Objects (1 modified, 6 added, 4 removed)
Details
- Caselist.CitesClass[97]
-
- Cites
-
... ... @@ -1,17 +1,0 @@ 1 -RVIs must be bidrectional 2 -2. Normative ethic required 3 -3. ROTB spec 4 -4. 1AC Spikes need to be fully fleshed out (voter, violations, paradigm issues) 5 -5. Not reading stupid spikes like neg may only have one unconditional route to the ballot 6 -6. Skep triggers bad 7 -7. NIBs bad/A prioris Bad 8 -8. Descriptive frameworks (like polls) bad 9 -9. Flash, email chain, print, or lose 10 -10. Disclose at least first 3 last 3, tags, and advocacy text(s) in a clear and easy to follow manner within 1 hour post debate 11 -Must disclose plan-text at least 24 hours before the round. 12 -12. The affirmative must specify what constitutionally protected speech they defend in an explicit advocacy text in 1AC. 13 -13. Hidden A prioris bad 14 -14. Must know methodologies of studies (sample size, scope, etc) 15 -15. Miscutting Ev Bad 16 -16. O- Spec 17 -17. Intrinsic Perms Bad - EntryDate
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -2017-02-25 01:14:11.0 - Judge
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -x - Opponent
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -x - ParentRound
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -95 - Round
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -9 - Team
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -Phoenix Country Day Whitfil Neg - Title
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -0- Neg Theory Interps - Tournament
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -All
- Caselist.CitesClass[99]
-
- Cites
-
... ... @@ -1,17 +1,0 @@ 1 -1. RVIs must be bidrectional 2 -2. Normative ethic required 3 -3. If they claim RVIs in the 1ac, must spec conditions of RVI 4 -4. 1AC Spikes need to be fully fleshed out (voter, violations, paradigm issues) 5 -5. Not reading stupid spikes like neg may only have one unconditional route to the ballot 6 -6. Skep triggers bad 7 -7. NIBs bad/A prioris Bad 8 -8. Descriptive frameworks (like polls) bad 9 -9. Flash, email chain, print, or lose 10 -10. Disclose at least first 3 last 3, tags, and advocacy text(s) in a clear and easy to follow manner within 1 hour post debate 11 -11. Must disclose aff 30 mins before round (if broken) 12 -12. The affirmative must specify what constitutionally protected speech they defend in an explicit advocacy text in 1AC. 13 -13. Hidden A prioris bad 14 -14. Must know methodologies of studies (sample size, scope, etc) 15 -15. Miscutting Ev Bad 16 -16. O- Spec Bad 17 -17. Intrinsic Perms Bad - EntryDate
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -2017-04-12 20:36:33.0 - Judge
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -x - Opponent
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -x - ParentRound
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -98 - Round
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -9 - Team
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -Phoenix Country Day Whitfil Neg - Title
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -0- Neg Theory Interps - Tournament
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -All
- Caselist.RoundClass[81]
-
- Cites
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -94 - EntryDate
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -2017-02-25 00:28:15.0 - Judge
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -x - Opponent
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -x - Round
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -9 - Tournament
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -All
- Caselist.RoundClass[95]
-
- Cites
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -97 - EntryDate
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -2017-02-25 01:14:09.0 - Judge
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -x - Opponent
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -x - Round
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -9 - Tournament
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -All
- Caselist.RoundClass[102]
-
- EntryDate
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,1 @@ 1 -2017-04-18 21:26:36. 971 +2017-04-18 21:26:36.0
- Caselist.CitesClass[104]
-
- Cites
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,18 @@ 1 +1. RVIs must be bidrectional 2 +2. Normative ethic required 3 +3. If they claim RVIs in the 1ac, must spec conditions of RVI 4 +4. 1AC Spikes need to be fully fleshed out (voter, violations, paradigm issues) 5 +5. Not reading stupid spikes like neg may only have one unconditional route to the ballot 6 +6. Skep triggers bad 7 +7. NIBs bad/A prioris Bad 8 +8. Descriptive frameworks (like polls) bad 9 +9. Flash, email chain, print, or lose 10 +10. Disclose at least first 3 last 3, tags, and advocacy text(s) in a clear and easy to follow manner within 1 hour post debate 11 +Must disclose aff 30 mins before round (if broken) 12 +12. The affirmative must specify what constitutionally protected speech they defend in an explicit advocacy text in 1AC. 13 +13. Hidden A prioris bad 14 +14. Must know methodologies of studies (sample size, scope, etc) 15 +15. Miscutting Ev Bad 16 +16. O- Spec Bad 17 +17. Intrinsic Perms Bad 18 +18. If you read presumption in the aff, must spec conditions it is relevant. - EntryDate
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +2017-04-18 21:28:03.0 - Judge
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +x - Opponent
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +x - ParentRound
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +104 - Round
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +9 - Team
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +Phoenix Country Day Whitfil Neg - Title
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +0- Neg Theory Interps - Tournament
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +All
- Caselist.CitesClass[106]
-
- Cites
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,21 @@ 1 +RVIs must be bidrectional 2 +2. Normative ethic required 3 +3. If they claim RVIs in the 1ac, must spec conditions of RVI 4 +4. 1AC Spikes need to be fully fleshed out (voter, violations, paradigm issues) 5 +5. Not reading stupid spikes like neg may only have one unconditional route to the ballot 6 +6. Skep triggers bad 7 +7. NIBs bad/A prioris Bad 8 +8. Descriptive frameworks (like polls) bad 9 +9. Flash, email chain, print, or lose 10 +10. Disclose at least first 3 last 3, tags, and advocacy text(s) in a clear and easy to follow manner within 1 hour post debate 11 +Must disclose aff 30 mins before round (if broken) 12 +12. The affirmative must specify what constitutionally protected speech they defend in an explicit advocacy text in 1AC. 13 +13. Hidden A prioris bad 14 +14. Must know methodologies of studies (sample size, scope, etc) 15 +15. Miscutting Ev Bad 16 +16. O- Spec Bad 17 +17. Intrinsic Perms Bad 18 +18. If you read presumption in the aff, must spec conditions it is relevant. 19 +19. Must disclose round reports for every round describing each off 20 + 21 +Exact text is syntehtic to round often, msg me if you want them - EntryDate
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +2017-04-29 11:29:10.0 - Judge
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +x - Opponent
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +x - ParentRound
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +106 - Round
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +9 - Team
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +Phoenix Country Day Whitfil Neg - Title
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +0- 1NC Theory Interps - Tournament
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +All
- Caselist.RoundClass[103]
-
- Cites
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +103 - EntryDate
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +2017-04-18 21:27:32.0 - Judge
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +x - Opponent
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +x - Round
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +9 - Tournament
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +All
- Caselist.RoundClass[104]
-
- Cites
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +104 - EntryDate
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +2017-04-18 21:28:01.0 - Judge
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +x - Opponent
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +x - Round
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +9 - Tournament
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +All
- Caselist.RoundClass[105]
-
- Cites
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +105 - EntryDate
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +2017-04-29 11:28:57.0 - Judge
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +x - Opponent
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +x - Round
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +9 - Tournament
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +All
- Caselist.RoundClass[106]
-
- Cites
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +106 - EntryDate
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +2017-04-29 11:29:09.0 - Judge
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +x - Opponent
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +x - Round
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +9 - Tournament
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +All