| ... |
... |
@@ -1,0
+1,14 @@ |
|
1 |
+Practical reflection is an inescapable aspect of agency, multiple warrants |
|
2 |
+Ferrero Luca Ferrero (University of Wisconsin at Milwaukee) “Constitutivism and the Inescapability of Agency” Oxford Studies in Metaethics, vol. IV January 12th 2009 pp. 6-8 |
|
3 |
+3.2 Agency is special … closed under itself.15 |
|
4 |
+Thus, the standard is respecting freedom. Prefer the standard: all frameworks presuppose liberty- three warrants. |
|
5 |
+ |
|
6 |
+Freedom implies an innate right to determine the course of your actions. In the state of nature, might rather than right governs these judgments. Absent of a public authority, rights violations are inevitable. VARDEN: |
|
7 |
+“A Kantian Conception of Free Speech” by Helga Varden Chapter from: “Freedom of Expression in a Diverse World” edited by Deirdre Golash 2010 |
|
8 |
+“The first important … anyone’s arbitrary choices.” (46-47) |
|
9 |
+ |
|
10 |
+And, according to Cornell Law, the Brandenburg v. Ohio U.S. Supreme Court decision maintains that seditious speech is protected by the First Amendment so long as it does not indicate an “imminent” threat. https://www.law.cornell.edu/supremecourt/text/395/444 |
|
11 |
+ |
|
12 |
+But, seditious speech is never compatible with an omnilateral will and must be restricted. The intent requires the right to destroy the state, which justifies the annihilation of all rights. VARDEN 2: |
|
13 |
+“A Kantian Conception of Free Speech” by Helga Varden Chapter from: “Freedom of Expression in a Diverse World” edited by Deirdre Golash 2010 |
|
14 |
+“To understand Kant’s …. a public crime (6: 331).” (52) |