| ... |
... |
@@ -1,0
+1,15 @@ |
|
1 |
+The starting point of the 1AC is wrong, it is based on the exclusion vs inclusion argument, it takes oppressed identity and grades it against the dominant model. Their notion of equality is bringing people up to the level of the white man, which only continues the hunt for deviancy as it is impossible to completely live up to that standard. |
|
2 |
+Saldanha 07, Arun Saldanha, Associate Professor of Geography, Environment, and Society at University of Minnesota, Senior Lecturer of Social Sustainability at Lancaster University, 2007, “Psychedelic White: Goa Trance and the Viscosity of Race,” |
|
3 |
+My disagreement is …. into the universal. |
|
4 |
+ |
|
5 |
+They recreate the oppression they try to fight by creating a war against deviancy. |
|
6 |
+Evans 10, Brad, Evans is a Lecturer in the School of Politics and International Studies at the University of Leeds and Programme Director for International Relations, “Foucault’s Legacy: Security, War, and Violence in the 21st Century,” Security Dialogue vol.41, no. 4, August 2010, pg. 422-424. |
|
7 |
+Imposing liberalism has ….. so on’ (Foucault, 2003: 256). |
|
8 |
+ |
|
9 |
+The alternative is to dismantle the face ~-~-- this undermines the faciality machines that they seek recognition through and their normative value. |
|
10 |
+BIGNALL 12: , Simone. “Dismantling the Face: Pluralism and the Politics of Recognition.” University of New South Wales. 2012. |
|
11 |
+Deleuze and Guattari ….. inevitability and stability. |
|
12 |
+ |
|
13 |
+The role of the ballot is to vote for the better debate that best interrogates the oppressive politics of recognition. |
|
14 |
+Maccormack, Patricia “Faciality” http://archeologia.women.it/user/quarta/workshops/spectacles2/patriciamaccormack.htm |
|
15 |
+I would add to this … the ‘individual’ face. |