Summary

• Objects (1 modified, 1 added, 0 removed)
  • Caselist.CitesClass[53]
  • Caselist.CitesClass[54]

Details

Caselist.CitesClass[53]

EntryDate

...	...	@@ -1,1 +1,1 @@
1		-2017-01-28 21:14:37.497
	1	+2017-01-28 21:14:37.0

Caselist.CitesClass[54]

Cites

...	...	@@ -1,0 +1,40 @@
	1	+Interpretation: The word resolved implies a policy.
	2	+Louisiana House 3-8-2005, http://house.louisiana.gov/house-glossary.htm
	3	+Resolution A legislative ….n nor to governor's veto. ( Const. Art. III, §17(B) and House Rules 8.11 , 13.1 , 6.8 , and 7.4)
	4	+
	5	+
	6	+Violation—very clear in CX that the aff won’t defend passing a prohibition
	7	+
	8	+C. Standards –
	9	+1. Limits— 3 impacts:
	10	+
	11	+A. Analytic
	12	+B. Education—under limited debates make debate impossible for people who have actual lives outside of this activity. Harris 13—
	13	+
	14	+Scott Harris (Director of Debate at U Kansas, 2006 National Debate Coach of the Year, Vice President of the American Forensic Association, 2nd speaker at the NDT in 1981). “This ballot.” 5 April 2013. CEDA Forums. http://www.cedadebate.org/forum/index.php?action=dlattach;topic=4762.0;attach=1655
	15	+
	16	+I understand that...in the activity)
	17	+
	18	+2. Critical thinking: topical switch side debate breaks down ideology and teaches deeper decision making skills.
	19	+
	20	+Dame 13, John and Jeffrey Gedmin, Three Tips For Overcoming Your Blind Spots, Harvard Buisness Review, http://blogs.hbr.org/2013/10/three-tips-for-overcoming-your-blind-spots
	21	+To fight confirmation ... checks you constantly.
	22	+
	23	+Analytic.
	24	+
	25	+
	26	+D. Fairness first
	27	+
	28	+1. Unfair activities literally lead to people quitting debate, if the aff is valuable discussion at all it would want to be heard by the most people.
	29	+Speice, Patrick and Jim Lyle, 2003, “Traditional Policy Debate: Now More Than Ever”, Debaters Research Guide, http://groups.wfu.edu/debate/MiscSites/DRGArticles/SpeiceLyle2003htm.htm)
	30	+
	31	+As with any ... for all participants.
	32	+
	33	+2. It precludes the AC because the ballot asks who the better debater is and you cannot do that if the AC is unfair. This means don’t allow cross application from the AC because we don’t know if those are true.
	34	+Massey et al 14, “Pre-Fiat Arguments”, Emily Massey, Grant Reiter, Geoff Kristof 2/3/14 http://nsdupdate.com/2014/02/03/pre-fiat-arguments-by-emily-massey-grant-reiter-and-geoff-kristof/
	35	+Third, pre-fiat debaters … that pre-fiat layer.
	36	+
	37	+3. Debate is a competitive game, and rigging that game in your favor denies respect for the participants and prevents meaningful discussion of the aff.
	38	+Galloway 7
	39	+Ryan Galloway 7, Samford Comm prof, Contemporary Argumentation and Debate, Vol. 28, 2007
	40	+Debate as a ... time and power (Farrell, 1985, p. 114).

EntryDate

...	...	@@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
	1	+2017-01-28 21:14:38.299

Judge

...	...	@@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
	1	+Drew Marshall

Opponent

...	...	@@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
	1	+Prosper ZE

ParentRound

...	...	@@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
	1	+45

Round

...	...	@@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
	1	+2

Team

...	...	@@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
	1	+Phoenix Country Day Whitfil Neg

Title

...	...	@@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
	1	+0 - Defend the Topic T

Tournament

...	...	@@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
	1	+Greenhill