| ... |
... |
@@ -1,10
+1,0 @@ |
| 1 |
|
-A. Interp: The aff must defend that all constitutionally protected speech in all venues ought not be restricted by public colleges or universities. To clarify, they can’t defend removing a specific restriction on speech. |
| 2 |
|
-Counterplans that place restrictions on only specific types of speech but eliminate all others are theoretically illegitimate. |
| 3 |
|
- |
| 4 |
|
-B. Violation: |
| 5 |
|
- |
| 6 |
|
-C. 1. Legal Precision- Multiple court rulings agree- any means all |
| 7 |
|
-Elder 91, David, “Any and All": To Use Or Not To Use?,” 1991, http://www.michbar.org/file/generalinfo/plainenglish/pdfs/91_oct.pdf |
| 8 |
|
-The Michigan Supreme …. s Accident Ass'n, supra) |
| 9 |
|
- |
| 10 |
|
-2. limits |