| ... |
... |
@@ -1,0
+1,17 @@ |
|
1 |
+Psychoanalysis imposes its conception on the anlysand by force if necessary which is a form of colonization – they script any form of minoritarian resistance. |
|
2 |
+Brickman 3 Celia, Aboriginal Populations in the Mind: Race and Primitivity in Psychoanalysis, p. 192//shree |
|
3 |
+This adversarial configuration …. position of subordination. |
|
4 |
+They treat those being analyzed as raw material—that replaces material exploitation with psychic exploitation, replicating colonialist violence. |
|
5 |
+Brickman 3 Celia, Aboriginal Populations in the Mind: Race and Primitivity in Psychoanalysis, p. 201-2 |
|
6 |
+The authority of …. the investigation. |
|
7 |
+Psychoanalysis can’t account for the black body because it assumes a human analysand—the alt recreates anti-blackness |
|
8 |
+Wilderson 10 (Frank B. III, Prof of Af Am Studies and Drama at UCI, “Red, White and Black”, n***** was edited to slave//RW) |
|
9 |
+Alienation, however, that ….. in the woodpile. |
|
10 |
+ |
|
11 |
+This figures into the production of “Man” as racializing assemblage – blackness is positioned simultaneously inside and outside Man which creates the conditions for the emergence of the sociogenetic demarcation between human and not-quite-human – instead, we should foreground the deconstruction of Man as a category. The role of the ballot is to deconstruct the European Man. |
|
12 |
+Weheliye 2 |
|
13 |
+Wynter’s large-scale ….. than specific groups. |
|
14 |
+ |
|
15 |
+We affirm Habeas Viscus, a relational assemblage which transforms the hieroglyphics of the flesh into a line of flight, a new type of sumptuous freedom which can interrupt racializing assemblages – whereas dialectically opposing the world of Man only naturalizes it, our affirmation instantiates new genres of humanity |
|
16 |
+Weheliye 3 |
|
17 |
+Because black cultures …… apocatastasis of human genres. |