| ... |
... |
@@ -1,38
+1,0 @@ |
| 1 |
|
-Interpretation: The word resolved implies a policy. |
| 2 |
|
-Louisiana House 3-8-2005, http://house.louisiana.gov/house-glossary.htm |
| 3 |
|
-Resolution A legislative ….n nor to governor's veto. ( Const. Art. III, §17(B) and House Rules 8.11 , 13.1 , 6.8 , and 7.4) |
| 4 |
|
- |
| 5 |
|
- |
| 6 |
|
-Violation—very clear in CX that the aff won’t defend passing a prohibition |
| 7 |
|
- |
| 8 |
|
-C. Standards – |
| 9 |
|
-1. Limits— 3 impacts: |
| 10 |
|
- |
| 11 |
|
-A. Analytic |
| 12 |
|
-B. Education—under limited debates make debate impossible for people who have actual lives outside of this activity. Harris 13— |
| 13 |
|
- |
| 14 |
|
-Scott Harris (Director of Debate at U Kansas, 2006 National Debate Coach of the Year, Vice President of the American Forensic Association, 2nd speaker at the NDT in 1981). “This ballot.” 5 April 2013. CEDA Forums. http://www.cedadebate.org/forum/index.php?action=dlattach;topic=4762.0;attach=1655 |
| 15 |
|
- |
| 16 |
|
-I understand that...in the activity) |
| 17 |
|
- |
| 18 |
|
-2. Critical thinking: topical switch side debate breaks down ideology and teaches deeper decision making skills. |
| 19 |
|
- |
| 20 |
|
-Dame 13, John and Jeffrey Gedmin, Three Tips For Overcoming Your Blind Spots, Harvard Buisness Review, http://blogs.hbr.org/2013/10/three-tips-for-overcoming-your-blind-spots |
| 21 |
|
-To fight confirmation ... checks you constantly. |
| 22 |
|
- |
| 23 |
|
-Analytic. |
| 24 |
|
- |
| 25 |
|
- |
| 26 |
|
-D. Fairness first |
| 27 |
|
- |
| 28 |
|
-1. Unfair activities literally lead to people quitting debate, if the aff is valuable discussion at all it would want to be heard by the most people. |
| 29 |
|
-Speice, Patrick and Jim Lyle, 2003, “Traditional Policy Debate: Now More Than Ever”, Debaters Research Guide, http://groups.wfu.edu/debate/MiscSites/DRGArticles/SpeiceLyle2003htm.htm) |
| 30 |
|
- |
| 31 |
|
-As with any ... for all participants. |
| 32 |
|
- |
| 33 |
|
-2. Analytic |
| 34 |
|
- |
| 35 |
|
-3. Debate is a competitive game, and rigging that game in your favor denies respect for the participants and prevents meaningful discussion of the aff. |
| 36 |
|
-Galloway 7 |
| 37 |
|
-Ryan Galloway 7, Samford Comm prof, Contemporary Argumentation and Debate, Vol. 28, 2007 |
| 38 |
|
-Debate as a ... time and power (Farrell, 1985, p. 114). |