| ... |
... |
@@ -1,0
+1,16 @@ |
|
1 |
+1. Spec status of CP in 1NC |
|
2 |
+2. Prioritize K vs T |
|
3 |
+3. NIBs Bad |
|
4 |
+4. Conditional PICs bad |
|
5 |
+5. PICs Bad (in spec context usually) |
|
6 |
+6. Condo Bad |
|
7 |
+7. Disclosure |
|
8 |
+8. Hidden Spikes bad |
|
9 |
+9. Must cx check or disclose spec interps (depends on spec interp) |
|
10 |
+10. Must know methodology for studies (sample size, scope, etc) |
|
11 |
+11. Must have advocacy text |
|
12 |
+12. Miscutting Ev bad |
|
13 |
+13. Vague Alts Bad |
|
14 |
+14. Can't read K of mindsent and turn the aff under that mindset |
|
15 |
+ |
|
16 |
+^Exact text of interp depends on the round. Usually the interp is synthetic to the actual debate. If you want the exact texts that I've broken I can tell you, just contact me. |