| ... |
... |
@@ -1,62
+1,0 @@ |
| 1 |
|
-Part 1 is Framing |
| 2 |
|
-Patriotic Correctness on campuses runs rampant- dissent is charged with treason and lines of critical thought are silenced. Higher education has been coopted by the military industrial complex, reducing the roles of teachers to mere technicians. Thus the role of the ballot is to vote for the advocacy that best minimizes oppression. Educators should reject the call of abstraction and open up everything for contestation. |
| 3 |
|
-Giroux 13, Henry, Public Intellectuals Against the Neoliberal University, 2013, http://www.truth-out.org/opinion/item/19654-public-intellectuals-against-the-neoliberal-university |
| 4 |
|
-Increasingly, as universities …. world around them. |
| 5 |
|
- |
| 6 |
|
-prefer |
| 7 |
|
- |
| 8 |
|
-1. Ideal theory strips away particularities making ethics inaccessible and epistemologically skewed |
| 9 |
|
-Mills 05, Charles, 2005, Ideal Theory” as Ideology, |
| 10 |
|
-The crucial common claim—….. at may be misleading. |
| 11 |
|
-Non-ideal theory necessitates consequentialism since instead of following rules that assume an already equal playing field; we take steps to correct material injustice. |
| 12 |
|
- |
| 13 |
|
-Part 2 is Advocacy |
| 14 |
|
-Plan text, Resolved: Public colleges and universities in the United States ought not restrict constitutionally protected speech that criticizes the military’s policies. |
| 15 |
|
- |
| 16 |
|
-Part 3 is Offense |
| 17 |
|
- |
| 18 |
|
-In the status quo, members of college campuses are routinely fired if they criticize the military, causing a chilling effect on such discussion. Multiple empirical examples prove: |
| 19 |
|
-Wilson 15, John K., Ph.D candidate with dissertation on the history of academic freedom in America and author of three books, “Patriotic Correctness: Academic Freedom and Its Enemies,” Routledge, Nov 30, 2015 |
| 20 |
|
-Compared to earlier “… supreme after 9/11. |
| 21 |
|
- |
| 22 |
|
-This is devastating because higher education is the uniquely key institution that can provide spaces for conversations and action that snowball into cultural shifts away from militarism. History proves, anti-military dissent has always been silenced when the State is hell-bent on imposing its agenda and quieting opposition. Voting aff helps teach students to refuse complicity with militarism |
| 23 |
|
-Jaschik and Giroux 07, Henry Giroux and Scott Jaschik, 'The University in Chains', (Interview), 2007, https://www.insidehighered.com/news/2007/08/07/giroux |
| 24 |
|
-Q: How do you ….. s requisite for a viable democracy. |
| 25 |
|
- |
| 26 |
|
- |
| 27 |
|
-2 impacts |
| 28 |
|
-A. Cultural shift- |
| 29 |
|
- The aff teaches students to refuse the myth of militarism- this creates a cultural shift away from the glorification of violence |
| 30 |
|
-Chatterjee and Maira 14 Piya Chatterjee, Backstrand Chair and Professor of Feminist, Gender and Sexuality Studies at Scripps College, Sunaina Maira, Professor of Asian American Studies at UC Davis, “The Imperial University: Academic Repression and Scholarly Dissent,” University of Minnesota Press, 2014 JW |
| 31 |
|
-State warfare and …. “anti-American” ideologies. |
| 32 |
|
- |
| 33 |
|
-Militarism is part of the culture, making people disposable- justifying and creating everyday violence against the Middle Eastern Other. The aff allows student and professors to refuse this culture. |
| 34 |
|
-Chatterjee and Maira 2 Piya Chatterjee, Backstrand Chair and Professor of Feminist, Gender and Sexuality Studies at Scripps College, Sunaina Maira, Professor of Asian American Studies at UC Davis, “The Imperial University: Academic Repression and Scholarly Dissent,” University of Minnesota Press, 2014 JW |
| 35 |
|
-The strategic co-optation … s the campus climate in general. |
| 36 |
|
-B. Political Spillover |
| 37 |
|
-Academics have used state resources and their own academic freedom to create positive policy change proving that liberalizing the university creates concrete material impacts |
| 38 |
|
-Slaughter 88 Sheila Slaughter, associate professor in the Center for the Study of Higher Education and director of the Division of Educational Foundations and Administration, The University of Arizona, “Academic Freedom and the State: Reflections on the Uses of Knowledge,” The Journal of Higher Education, Vol. 59, No. 3 (May - Jun., 1988), pp. 241-262 JW |
| 39 |
|
-In the 1960s and …. create new theologies. |
| 40 |
|
- |
| 41 |
|
-Military power is unsustainable. Trying to expand power when it’s failing triggers resentment, which link turns their offense. |
| 42 |
|
-Maher 11 – Postdoctoral Fellow at the European University Institute and Visiting Lecturer in the Political Science Department at Brown University |
| 43 |
|
-(Richard, Winter 2011, “The Paradox of American Unipolarity: Why the United States May Be Better Off in a Post-Unipolar World”, Orbis, Vol. 55, No. 1, UTD McDermitt Library, KONTOPOULOS) |
| 44 |
|
-Since the disintegration … ‘‘post-unipolar’’ world. |
| 45 |
|
- |
| 46 |
|
-Part 4 is Theory |
| 47 |
|
-1. All theory arguments have an implicit aff flex standard- the most recent empirics of late elim rounds show huge neg side bias |
| 48 |
|
-Adler 15, Are Judges Just Guessing? A Statistical Analysis of LD Elimination Round Panels by Steven Adler http://nsdupdate.com/2015/03/30/are-judges-just-guessing-a-statistical-analysis-of-ld-elimination-round-panels-by-steven-adler/ |
| 49 |
|
-Yet a plausible objection …. late elimination rounds: |
| 50 |
|
- |
| 51 |
|
-Also means presumption and permissibility flow aff- I did the better debating if the round is tied. But nothing in the case triggers presumption. |
| 52 |
|
- |
| 53 |
|
- |
| 54 |
|
-2. Analytic |
| 55 |
|
- |
| 56 |
|
-3. Analytic |
| 57 |
|
-Part 5 is Method |
| 58 |
|
-1. The aff deploys a heuristic to learn scenario planning- even if politics and colleges are bad, scenario analysis of policies is pedagogically valuable- it enhances creativity, deconstructs biases and teaches advocacy skills |
| 59 |
|
-Barma et al 16 – (May 2016, Advance Publication Online on 11/6/15, Naazneen Barma, PhD in Political Science from UC-Berkeley, Assistant Professor of National Security Affairs at the Naval Postgraduate School, Brent Durbin, PhD in Political Science from UC-Berkeley, Professor of Government at Smith College, Eric Lorber, JD from UPenn and PhD in Political Science from Duke, Gibson, Dunn and Crutcher, Rachel Whitlark, PhD in Political Science from GWU, Post-Doctoral Research Fellow with the Project on Managing the Atom and International Security Program within the Belfer Center for Science and International Affairs at Harvard, “‘Imagine a World in Which’: Using Scenarios in Political Science,” International Studies Perspectives 17 (2), pp. 1-19, http://www.naazneenbarma.com/uploads/2/9/6/9/29695681/using_scenarios_in_political_science_isp_2015.pdf) |
| 60 |
|
-What Are Scenarios … in international affairs. |
| 61 |
|
- |
| 62 |
|
-More analytics |