| ... |
... |
@@ -1,11
+1,0 @@ |
| 1 |
|
-There are obviously many more things the neg could do that may be abusive, but this often depends on context. I haven’t hit the whole gamut of abusive neg arguments. I will add interps as I break them. The interps below are norms I am 100 percent committed to when I affirm and strongly encourage you to commit to as well because I think they lead to better debates regardless of context. I frequently discuss theory and update my files, so my views may change as the year progresses and I reserve the right to add or subtract to this list. |
| 2 |
|
- |
| 3 |
|
-Interps we think neg’s should comply with: |
| 4 |
|
- |
| 5 |
|
-1. Spec status of CP in NC itself |
| 6 |
|
-2. Prioritize K vs T in NC itself |
| 7 |
|
-3. NIBs Bad |
| 8 |
|
-4. Conditional PICs bad |
| 9 |
|
-5. PICs Bad (in spec context usually) |
| 10 |
|
- |
| 11 |
|
-^Exact text of interp depends on the round. Usually the interp is synthetic to the actual debate. |