Summary

• Objects (1 modified, 1 added, 0 removed)
  • Caselist.RoundClass[33]
  • Caselist.CitesClass[25]

Details

Caselist.RoundClass[33]

EntryDate

...	...	@@ -1,1 +1,1 @@
1		-2017-01-29 00:52:28.234
	1	+2017-01-29 00:52:28.0

Caselist.CitesClass[25]

Cites

...	...	@@ -1,0 +1,61 @@
	1	+Part 1 is Advocacy
	2	+
	3	+Public colleges and universities are the hallmark for society’s commitment to critical education of students who will become the leaders of tomorrow. These institutions are renowned for their commitment to academic freedom that are glossed over in day-in day-out life. That changed post 9/11- now patriotic correctness runs rampant
	4	+Wilson 15, John K., Ph.D candidate with dissertation on the history of academic freedom in America and author of three books, “Patriotic Correctness: Academic Freedom and Its Enemies,” Routledge, Nov 30, 2015
	5	+After 9/11 the … important than ever.
	6	+
	7	+Thus, the plan text, Resolved: Public colleges and universities in the United States ought not restrict constitutionally protected speech that criticizes the military’s policies.
	8	+
	9	+Part 2 is Framing
	10	+Higher education has been coopted by the military industrial complex, reducing the roles of teachers to mere technicians. The role of the ballot is to vote for the advocacy that best takes back the university from militarism. Educators should reject the call of abstraction and open up everything for contestation.
	11	+Giroux 13, Henry, Public Intellectuals Against the Neoliberal University, 2013, http://www.truth-out.org/opinion/item/19654-public-intellectuals-against-the-neoliberal-university
	12	+Increasingly, as universities …. the world around them.
	13	+
	14	+Ideal theory strips away particularities making ethics inaccessible and epistemically skewed
	15	+Mills 05, Charles, 2005, Ideal Theory” as Ideology,
	16	+The crucial common claim… at may be misleading.
	17	+
	18	+
	19	+
	20	+
	21	+Part 3 is Offense
	22	+
	23	+In the status quo, members of college campuses are routinely fired if they criticize the military, causing a chilling effect on such discussion. Multiple empirical examples prove:
	24	+Wilson 2, John K., Ph.D candidate with dissertation on the history of academic freedom in America and author of three books, “Patriotic Correctness: Academic Freedom and Its Enemies,” Routledge, Nov 30, 2015
	25	+Compared to earlier “… supreme after 9/11.
	26	+
	27	+This is devastating because higher education is the uniquely key institution that can provide spaces for conversations and action that snowball into cultural shifts away from militarism. History proves, anti-military dissent has always been silenced when the State is hell-bent on imposing its agenda and quieting opposition. Voting aff helps teach students to refuse complicity with militarism
	28	+Jaschik and Giroux 07, Henry Giroux and Scott Jaschik, 'The University in Chains', (Interview), 2007, https://www.insidehighered.com/news/2007/08/07/giroux
	29	+Q: How do you …. for a viable democracy.
	30	+
	31	+
	32	+2 impacts
	33	+A. Cultural shift-
	34	+ The aff teaches students to refuse the myth of militarism- this creates a cultural shift away from the glorification of violence
	35	+Chatterjee and Maira 14 Piya Chatterjee, Backstrand Chair and Professor of Feminist, Gender and Sexuality Studies at Scripps College, Sunaina Maira, Professor of Asian American Studies at UC Davis, “The Imperial University: Academic Repression and Scholarly Dissent,” University of Minnesota Press, 2014 JW
	36	+State warfare and …. or “anti-American” ideologies.
	37	+
	38	+Militarism is part of the culture, making people disposable- justifying and creating everyday violence against the Middle Eastern Other. The aff allows student and professors to refuse this culture.
	39	+Chatterjee and Maira 2 Piya Chatterjee, Backstrand Chair and Professor of Feminist, Gender and Sexuality Studies at Scripps College, Sunaina Maira, Professor of Asian American Studies at UC Davis, “The Imperial University: Academic Repression and Scholarly Dissent,” University of Minnesota Press, 2014 JW
	40	+The strategic co-optation …. mpus climate in general.
	41	+B. Political Spillover
	42	+Academics have used state resources and their own academic freedom to create positive policy change proving that liberalizing the university creates concrete material impacts
	43	+Slaughter 88 Sheila Slaughter, associate professor in the Center for the Study of Higher Education and director of the Division of Educational Foundations and Administration, The University of Arizona, “Academic Freedom and the State: Reflections on the Uses of Knowledge,” The Journal of Higher Education, Vol. 59, No. 3 (May - Jun., 1988), pp. 241-262 JW
	44	+In the 1960s and …. create new theologies.
	45	+Part 4 is Theory
	46	+1. All theory arguments have an implicit aff flex standard- the most recent empirics of late elim rounds show huge neg side bias
	47	+Adler 15, Are Judges Just Guessing? A Statistical Analysis of LD Elimination Round Panels by Steven Adler http://nsdupdate.com/2015/03/30/are-judges-just-guessing-a-statistical-analysis-of-ld-elimination-round-panels-by-steven-adler/
	48	+Yet a plausible objection …. late elimination rounds:
	49	+
	50	+Part 5 is Method
	51	+1. The aff deploys a heuristic to learn scenario planning- even if politics and colleges are bad, scenario analysis of policies is pedagogically valuable- it enhances creativity, deconstructs biases and teaches advocacy skills
	52	+Barma et al 16 – (May 2016, Advance Publication Online on 11/6/15, Naazneen Barma, PhD in Political Science from UC-Berkeley, Assistant Professor of National Security Affairs at the Naval Postgraduate School, Brent Durbin, PhD in Political Science from UC-Berkeley, Professor of Government at Smith College, Eric Lorber, JD from UPenn and PhD in Political Science from Duke, Gibson, Dunn and Crutcher, Rachel Whitlark, PhD in Political Science from GWU, Post-Doctoral Research Fellow with the Project on Managing the Atom and International Security Program within the Belfer Center for Science and International Affairs at Harvard, “‘Imagine a World in Which’: Using Scenarios in Political Science,” International Studies Perspectives 17 (2), pp. 1-19, http://www.naazneenbarma.com/uploads/2/9/6/9/29695681/using_scenarios_in_political_science_isp_2015.pdf)
	53	+What Are Scenarios …. in international affairs.
	54	+
	55	+ We should focus on particular circumstances which best tackle material violence.
	56	+Pappas 16, Gregory Fernando, The Pragmatists’ Approach to Injustice”, The Pluralist Volume 11, Number 1, Spring 2016
	57	+In Experience and Nature, ….. specific to each patient.
	58	+
	59	+Root cause explanations of politics don’t exist- methodological pluralism is key to open up new ideas and avoid violence.
	60	+Bleiker 14 – (6/17, Roland, Professor of International Relations at the University of Queensland, “International Theory Between Reification and Self-Reflective Critique,” International Studies Review, Volume 16, Issue 2, pages 325–327)
	61	+For Levine, the key …. positivist social sciences.

EntryDate

...	...	@@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
	1	+2017-01-29 00:52:29.790

Judge

...	...	@@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
	1	+X

Opponent

...	...	@@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
	1	+Jason Yang

ParentRound

...	...	@@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
	1	+33

Round

...	...	@@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
	1	+6

Team

...	...	@@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
	1	+Phoenix Country Day Whitfil Aff

Title

...	...	@@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
	1	+Jan-Feb Patriotic Correctness AC v3

Tournament

...	...	@@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
	1	+Emory