| ... |
... |
@@ -1,0
+1,17 @@ |
|
1 |
+Security discourse causes apocalypse in the name of survival |
|
2 |
+Peter Coviello, Asst Prof of English – Bowdoin, ‘1 |
|
3 |
+(Queer Frontiers, ed. Boone, author’s italics) |
|
4 |
+ |
|
5 |
+Perhaps. But to claim that American culture is at present |
|
6 |
+ |
|
7 |
+AND |
|
8 |
+ |
|
9 |
+demise, nuclear or otherwise, seems a civic initiative that can scarcely be done without. |
|
10 |
+ |
|
11 |
+Vote neg to critique the aff’s security discourse as a prior question |
|
12 |
+Graeme Cheeseman, Snr. Lecturer @ New South Wales, and Robert Bruce, ‘96 |
|
13 |
+(Discourses of Danger and Dread Frontiers, p. 5-9) |
|
14 |
+ |
|
15 |
+This goal is pursued in ways which are still |
|
16 |
+AND |
|
17 |
+of broader intellectual debates, or resistant to them, or choose not to understand them, and why? |