| ... |
... |
@@ -1,0
+1,55 @@ |
|
1 |
+Intellectuals, such as judges and debaters, are in a unique position to combat regimes of “truth”. We operate in the realm of abstract arguments, which is where regimes of truth and grammatical correctness reside. |
|
2 |
+ |
|
3 |
+Foucault: |
|
4 |
+Michel Foucault, “Power and Knowledge,” 1980, Print. |
|
5 |
+It seems to...the present time |
|
6 |
+ |
|
7 |
+Creating an objective way to understand language is how the state asserts its power through the legal apparatus, creating such regimes of truth, destroying the revolutionary potential of critical discourse- under a “pragmatic” view of language, grammatical rules are no more than political assertions. |
|
8 |
+ |
|
9 |
+Deleuze and Guattari (1) 87 |
|
10 |
+Deleuze, Gilles, and Felix Guattari. Chapter 4 of "A Thousand Plateaus, translated by Brian Massumi." Minneapolis: University of Minnesota (1987). |
|
11 |
+But the scientific...transmitting order - words. |
|
12 |
+ |
|
13 |
+ |
|
14 |
+Limited interpretive paradigms only lead to reduction of literature as an object of consumption. |
|
15 |
+ |
|
16 |
+Deleuze and Guattari (2) 72 |
|
17 |
+Gilles Deleuze and Felix Guattari discuss this in relation to literature in their book, Anti-Oedipus: Capitalism and Schizophrenia (1972. p132-4.) : |
|
18 |
+Here again, oedipalization...means of escape. |
|
19 |
+ |
|
20 |
+Our identity as intellectuals in the debate space requires us to understand the resolution as a text containing infinite multiplicities of meaning rather than a static, single-dimensional plane for engagement. |
|
21 |
+ |
|
22 |
+Derrida 77 |
|
23 |
+Jacques Derridas 77, “Living On” in Ch. 3 of Deconstruction and Criticism. https://www.sas.upenn.edu/~cavitch/pdf-library/Derrida_LivingOn.pdf |
|
24 |
+ |
|
25 |
+If we are...in the foreground |
|
26 |
+ |
|
27 |
+We need to stop disrupting the flow of the text we embody, and we should stop contributing to the Oedipalization of knowledge. Rather than be a passive cataloguer, I, the aff, seek to imagine and write the interactions of the resolution. |
|
28 |
+ |
|
29 |
+Deleuze and Guattari (3) 72 |
|
30 |
+Gilles Deleuze and Felix Guattari discuss this in relation to literature in their book, Anti-Oedipus: Capitalism and Schizophrenia (1972. p132-4.) : |
|
31 |
+ |
|
32 |
+Strange Anglo-American ...not an expression |
|
33 |
+ |
|
34 |
+We should focus on the transformative power of the imaginative envisioning of students as becoming. |
|
35 |
+ |
|
36 |
+Steeves 14: |
|
37 |
+Toby Steeves, 2014, “Uttering towards otherwise: Students as rhizomatic nomad assemblages” |
|
38 |
+ |
|
39 |
+When popular visions...versions of themselves |
|
40 |
+ |
|
41 |
+Writing the assemblage of language and state forces the two concepts to grapple with each other in defining their limits and possibilities because their inherently defined power structures operate parallel to each other, rather than in rigid hierarchy. |
|
42 |
+ |
|
43 |
+Agamben 95: |
|
44 |
+Giorgio Agamben 95, Homo Sacer: Sovereign Power and Bare Life |
|
45 |
+ |
|
46 |
+The validity of...the law,’ ius dicere |
|
47 |
+ |
|
48 |
+Writing the university as a rhizome unveils possibilities for revolutionary change. |
|
49 |
+Barnett 13 |
|
50 |
+ (“Imagining the University,” published by Routledge) |
|
51 |
+A key idea...has a hard shell. |
|
52 |
+ |
|
53 |
+Barnett (2) |
|
54 |
+ 2013 (“Imagining the University,” published by Routledge) |
|
55 |
+ There is a...for this university. |