Summary

• Objects (1 modified, 1 added, 0 removed)
  • Caselist.CitesClass[3]
  • Caselist.CitesClass[4]

Details

Caselist.CitesClass[3]

EntryDate

...	...	@@ -1,1 +1,1 @@
1		-2016-09-10 16:59:49.150
	1	+2016-09-10 16:59:49.0

Caselist.CitesClass[4]

Cites

...	...	@@ -1,0 +1,12 @@
	1	+Belgium ought not involve themselves in the production of nuclear power.
	2	+To clarify they will neither prohibit the private production of nuclear power nor directly fund, subsidize, or in any other way use nuclear power themselves.
	3	+
	4	+Solves the aff—Nuclear Power is prohibitively expensive but only exists because of government subsidies and publicly owned power plants.
	5	+Investors look for short-term gains, but nuke power is a long-term capital-intensive investment, so the free market would avoid it
	6	+Pedraza 12
	7	+Jorge Morales Pedraza, consultant on international affairs, ambassador to the IAEA for 26 yrs, degree in math and economy sciences, former professor, Energy Science, Engineering and Technology : Nuclear Power: Current and Future Role in the World Electricity Generation : Current and Future Role in the World Electricity Generation, New York. Bob
	8	+Many countries had privatized government owned energy utilities, following a privatization policy of public companies promoting by the International Monetary Fund (IMF) and the World Bank (WB) within the current economic development policy promoted by these two organizations. Others have decided to keep the energy sector within the public sector of the country. One of the objectives to be achieved with the privatization of public utilities, according with the opinion of those that support a privatization policy, is to make them operate under conditions that are more commercial. However, the adoption of this privatization policy could limit these utilities to seek funds only in the commercial money markets, with their stronger emphasis on short-term returns on investment. This may means that capital-intensive plants such as nuclear power plants will not be favored by utilities planning to construct these types of plants without government support. This is an important element that needs to be carefully study when the nuclear option is being under consideration for its possible inclusion in the energy balance of any country.
	9	+
	10	+Nuclear power isn’t competitive-subsidizing and supporting it just wastes money, and the government has to insure and clean up for accidents.
	11	+Gottfried 6 Kurt; "Climate Change and Nuclear Power." Social Research: An International Quarterly 73.3 (2006): 1011-1024. Project MUSE. Web. 8 Aug. 2016. https://muse.jhu.edu/.
	12	+In the United States and in other countries where power generation is not a government function, the market can, in principle, decide whether nuclear power is economically viable. Here “in principle” alludes to familiar conditions required to create an unbiased market, and in addition to the special circumstances that stem from the unique dangers that attend nuclear power. First, the fact that no new plants have been built in the United States for more than two decades demonstrates that nuclear power has not been an attractive investment

EntryDate

...	...	@@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
	1	+2016-09-10 16:59:49.377

Judge

...	...	@@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
	1	+Adam Torson

Opponent

...	...	@@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
	1	+Lynbrook YZ

ParentRound

...	...	@@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
	1	+0

Round

...	...	@@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
	1	+1

Team

...	...	@@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
	1	+Palos Verdes Le Barillec Neg

Title

...	...	@@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
	1	+SEPTOCT - Exclusion CP

Tournament

...	...	@@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
	1	+Loyola