Summary

• Objects (1 modified, 1 added, 0 removed)
  • Caselist.RoundClass[10]
  • Caselist.CitesClass[26]

Details

Caselist.RoundClass[10]

EntryDate

...	...	@@ -1,1 +1,1 @@
1		-2016-11-07 21:42:08.217
	1	+2016-11-07 21:42:08.0

Caselist.CitesClass[26]

Cites

...	...	@@ -1,0 +1,18 @@
	1	+Interpretation: The aff must defend a prohibition on part or all of the application of qualified immunity for police officers.
	2	+
	3	+Limit means to restrict
	4	+Merriam Webster 16 – Merriam Webster’s Dictionary(“Limit” Available online at http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/limit)
	5	+Full Definition of limit
	6	+transitive verb
	7	+1: to assign certain limits to : prescribe reserved the right to limit use of the land
	8	+2 a : to restrict the bounds or limits of the specialist can no longer limit himself to his specialty
	9	+ b : to curtail or reduce in quantity or extent we must limit the power of aggressors
	10	+That refers only to outright prohibitions of areas of applications of the doctrine, not any action that has the consequence of decreasing use.
	11	+Caiaccio 94 – Kevin T. (“Are Noncompetition Covenants Among Law Partners Against Public Policy?” Georgia Law Review, Spring, 28 Ga. L. Rev. 807, Lexis)
	12	+The Howard court began its analysis by examining the California Business and Professions Code, which expressly permits reasonable restrictive covenants among business partners. 139 The court noted that this provision had long applied to doctors and accountants and concluded that the general language of the statute provided no indication of an exception for lawyers. 140 After reaching this conclusion, however, the court noted that, since it had the authority to promulgate a higher standard for lawyers, the statute alone did not necessarily control, 141 and the court therefore proceeded to examine the California Rules of Professional Conduct. 142 The court avoided the apparent conflict between the business statute and the ethics rule by undertaking a strained reading of the rule. In essence, the court held that the word "restrict" referred only to outright prohibitions, and that a mere "economic consequence" does not equal a prohibition. 143
	13	+
	14	+First – limits
	15	+
	16	+Second – ground
	17	+
	18	+Third – Effects T

EntryDate

...	...	@@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
	1	+2016-11-07 21:42:10.546

Judge

...	...	@@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
	1	+Ellen Ivens-Duran, Ryan Powell, Adam Torson

Opponent

...	...	@@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
	1	+West Ranch JW

ParentRound

...	...	@@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
	1	+10

Round

...	...	@@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
	1	+Quarters

Team

...	...	@@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
	1	+Palos Verdes Le Barillec Neg

Title

...	...	@@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
	1	+NOVDEC - T Limit

Tournament

...	...	@@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
	1	+Damus