| ... |
... |
@@ -1,11
+1,0 @@ |
| 1 |
|
-A. If the negative reads an interpretation that (insert their disclosure theory interp here), then they must disclose that interpretation on their page of the NDCA case wiki in (whatever time period they specify) |
| 2 |
|
- |
| 3 |
|
-A. The neg must concede the aff framework given that it is ends based act util and structurally turnable. |
| 4 |
|
- |
| 5 |
|
-A. Kritik alternatives must be unconditional. |
| 6 |
|
- |
| 7 |
|
-A. If the negative reads a K of any part of the AC, then the neg cannot turn the AC or operate under my mindset |
| 8 |
|
- |
| 9 |
|
-A. Affirmatives must advocate the prohibition of all forms of nuclear power in all countries |
| 10 |
|
- |
| 11 |
|
-A. On the NSDA topic “Resolved: Countries ought to prohibit the production of nuclear power,” the aff must specify and defend the implementation of a policy action by a government. |