Summary

• Objects (1 modified, 1 added, 0 removed)
  • Caselist.RoundClass[5]
  • Caselist.CitesClass[11]

Details

Caselist.RoundClass[5]

EntryDate

...	...	@@ -1,1 +1,1 @@
1		-2016-12-18 17:44:56.915
	1	+2016-12-18 17:44:56.0

Caselist.CitesClass[11]

Cites

...	...	@@ -1,0 +1,21 @@
	1	+====The ac has the wrong ontological starting point in forgetting disability which kills any reform to the system not based on our starting point- also means they link in performativity with their reading of the ac====
	2	+Campbell 05 is a Senior Lecturer in Disability Studies at the School of Human Services and Social Work Griffith University (Brisbane) and Adjunct Professor in Disability Studies, Faculty of Medicine, University of Kelaniya, Sri Lanka. "Legislating Disability: Negative Ontologies and the Government of Legal Identities" in "Foucault and Government of Disability" edited by Shelley Termain, University of Michigan Press, Pg 118-120
	3	+Sociological inquiry and legal investigation into disability1 must at some point implicitly return to,
	4	+AND
	5	+unthink disability and its resemblance to the essential (ableist) human self.
	6	+
	7	+
	8	+====AND THE VERY OPERATION OF DEMOCRACY, PERSONAL OPINIONS, AND ACTIVE CITIZENSHIP WITHIN THE AFF IS PRINCIPLED ON THE ABLE BODIED. THE IDEA OF FREE SPEECH PRESUPPOSES THAT A) SOMEONE IS LISTENING CLOSE ENOUGH TO CARE B) WE HAVE AUTONOMY AND C) WE HAVE A VOICE TO SPEAK UP WITH, ALL OF WHICH ARE EXCLUDED FOR DISABLED PEOPLE. RAISING OUR VOICE WILL JUST CONFLATE REPRESENTATION AND ASSOCIATION WITHIN THE SYSTEM that institutionally kills us or casts us aside to be forgotten,====
	9	+Breckenridge and Volger 11 (Carol Appadurai is an Associate Professor of History, The New School Candace Vogler is an associate professor in the Department of Philosophy at the University of Chicago, where she teaches ethics, social and political philosophy, and gender and sexuality studies., "The Critical Limits of Embodiment: Disability's Criticism", Public Culture, Volume 13, Number 3, Fall 2011) DR 15
	10	+Disability studies teaches that an assumed able body is crucial to the smooth operation of
	11	+AND
	12	+people unsettle ideals of social organization as freely chosen expressions of mutual desire.
	13	+
	14	+
	15	+
	16	+====The alternative is to Crip the 1AC that’s a refusal to play according to able-bodied logic. Instead, we embrace the wild extravagancy of disability by un-working institutions in order to carve out hospitable terrain ====
	17	+**Chandler 2013** (Eliza "Mapping difference: Critical connections between crip and diaspora communities", Critical Disability Discourse/Discours Critiques dans le Champ du Handicap 5, 39–66.)
	18	+As I have just described, disabled, racialized, and disabled racialized people live
	19	+AND
	20	+, not their superior weapons, numbers, or bloodthirst.
	21	+And framing

EntryDate

...	...	@@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
	1	+2016-12-18 17:44:58.362

Judge

...	...	@@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
	1	+any

Opponent

...	...	@@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
	1	+any

ParentRound

...	...	@@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
	1	+5

Round

...	...	@@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
	1	+9

Team

...	...	@@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
	1	+Palo Alto Neg

Title

...	...	@@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
	1	+Ableism nc- only broken position along with exempted theory interps

Tournament

...	...	@@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
	1	+cps