Summary

• Objects (1 modified, 1 added, 0 removed)
  • Caselist.CitesClass[8]
  • Caselist.CitesClass[9]

Details

Caselist.CitesClass[8]

EntryDate

...	...	@@ -1,1 +1,1 @@
1		-2016-12-02 20:26:09.555
	1	+2016-12-02 20:26:09.0

Caselist.CitesClass[9]

Cites

...	...	@@ -1,0 +1,36 @@
	1	+====the sovereign police and CJS are all the same — by instituting a mechanisms of self regulation they promote a violent form of subjectivization that renders all life null====
	2	+Van Munster, 5/28/2014 – Senior Researcher at the Danish Institute for International Studies (DIIS) and teaches security studies at the Department of Political Science, University of Southern Denmark (Rens, "The War on Terrorism: When the Exception Becomes the Rule", Danish Institute for International Studies, p. 141) CS
	3	+Douglas, independent scholar, 2009 – (Jeremy, "Disappearing Citizenship: surveillance and the state of exception", published in Surveillance and Society Vol 6, No 1, p. 34-35 http://library.queensu.ca/ojs/index.php/surveillance-and-society/article/view/3402/3365
	4	+Yet what emerges is, on the one hand, a theory of the top
	5	+AND
	6	+in terms of "bare life" and "the state of exception".
	7	+
	8	+
	9	+====AND Small-scale reform for police accountability like the AC cedes the existence of the police and makes the perm impossible====
	10	+Hotchkin ’15:
	11	+Hotchkin, Joshua. "Accountability Is Futile - Abolish the Police." Cop Block. N.p., 12 Nov. 2015. Web.
	12	+
	13	+Accountability is futile. There really could be nothing so simple to understand yet so
	14	+AND
	15	+a blindness which is able to fool us into believing we are seeing.
	16	+
	17	+
	18	+====AND The continuation of colonialism in America sets the foundation for intervention and will result in permanent genocidal war of mass atrocities====
	19	+**Street 4** ~~Paul, writes on imperialism, racism, and thought control for ZNet, "Those Who Deny the Crimes of the Past," 11 March 2004, http://www.zcommunications.org/those-who-deny-the-crimes-of-the-past-by-paul-street~~
	20	+It is especially important to appreciate the significance of the vicious, often explicitly genocidal
	21	+AND
	22	+a measure of justice, it should be our ultimate goal.
	23	+ Thus our counterplan is to give back US settler occupied land to indigenous groups which would necessarily include the abolishment of the police since 1. they wouldn't have any jurisdiction 2. police is a western idea 3. police is the sovereign can't have one without the other
	24	+And the 1 ac is the typical leftist mask for the state making it appear benevolent towards some group of people, even though its very existence is contingent on the legacy of colonization that guarantees the strengthening of the colonial order. Land rights needs to be our first political action anything else is delay tactics
	25	+Ward Churchill 1996 (Professor of Ethnic Studies at University of Colorado, Boulder, BA and MA in
	26	+
	27	+I’ll debunk some of this nonsense in a moment, but first I want to take up the posture of self-proclaimed leftist radicals in the same connection. And I’ll do so on the basis of principle, because justice is supposed to matter more to progressives than to rightwing hacks. Let me say that the pervasive and near-total silence of the Left in this connection has been quite illuminating. Non-Indian activists, with only a handful of exceptions, persistently plead that they can’t really take a coherent position on the matter of Indian land rights because “unfortunately,” they’re “not really conversant with the issues” (as if these were tremendously complex). Meanwhile, they do virtually nothing, generation after generation, to inform themselves on the topic of who actually owns the ground they’re standing on. The record can be played only so many times before it wears out and becomes just another variation of “hear no evil, see no evil.” At this point, it doesn’t take Albert Einstein to figure out that the Left doesn’t know much about such things because it’s never wanted to know, or that this is so because it’s always had its own plans for utilizing land it has no more right to than does the status quo it claims to oppose. The usual technique for explaining this away has always been a sort of pro forma acknowledgement that Indian land rights are of course “really important stuff” (yawn), but that one” really doesn’t have a lot of time to get into it (I’ll buy your book, though, and keep it on my shelf, even if I never read it). Reason? Well, one is just “overwhelmingly preoccupied” with working on “other important issues” (meaning, what they consider to be more important issues). Typically enumerated are sexism, racism, homophobia, class inequities, militarism, the environment, or some combination of these. It is a pretty good evasion, all in all. Certainly, there’s no denying any of these issues their due; they are all important, obviously so. But more important than the question of land rights? There are some serious problems of primacy and priority imbedded in the orthodox script. To frame things clearly in this regard, lets hypothesize for a moment that all of the various non-Indian movements concentrating on each of these issues were suddenly successful in accomplishing their objectives . Lets imagine that the United States as a whole were somehow transformed into an entity defined by the parity of its race, class, and gender relations, its embrace of unrestricted sexual preference, its rejection of militarism in all forms, and its abiding concern with environmental protection (I know, I know, this is a sheer impossibility, but that’s my point). When all is said and done, the society resulting from this scenario is still, first and foremost, a colonialist society, an imperialist society in the most fundamental sense possible with all that this implies. This is true because the scenario does nothing at all to address the fact that whatever is happening happens on someone else’s land, not only without their consent, but through an adamant disregard for their rights to the land. Hence, all it means is that the immigrant or invading population has rearranged its affairs in such a way as to make itself more comfortable at the continuing expense of indigenous people. The colonial equation remains intact and may even be reinforced by a greater degree of participation, and vested interest in maintenance of the colonial order among the settler population at large. The dynamic here is not very different from that evident in the American Revolution of the late 18th century, is it? And we all know very well where that led, don’t we? Should we therefore begin to refer to socialist imperialism, feminist imperialism, gay and lesbian imperialism, environmental imperialism, African American, and la Raza imperialism? I would hope not. I would hope this is all just a matter of confusion, of muddled priorities among people who really do mean well and who’d like to do better. If so, then all that is necessary to correct the situation is a basic rethinking of what must be done., and in what order. Here, I’d advance the straightforward premise that the land rights of “First Americans” should serve as a first priority for everyone seriously committed to accomplishing positive change in North America. But before I suggest everyone jump off and adopt this priority, I suppose it’s only fair that I interrogate the converse of the proposition: if making things like class inequity and sexism the preeminent focus of progressive action in North America inevitably perpetuates the internal colonial structure of the United States, does the reverse hold true? I’ll state unequivocally that it does not. There is no indication whatsoever that a restoration of indigenous sovereignty in Indian Country would foster class stratification anywhere, least of all in Indian Country. In fact, all indications are that when left to their own devices, indigenous peoples have consistently organized their societies in the most class-free manners. Look to the example of the Haudenosaunee (Six Nations Iroquois Confederacy). Look to the Muscogee (Creek) Confederacy. Look to the confederations of the Yaqui and the Lakota, and those pursued and nearly perfected by Pontiac and Tecumseh. They represent the very essence of enlightened egalitarianism and democracy. Every imagined example to the contrary brought forth by even the most arcane anthropologist can be readily offset by a couple of dozen other illustrations along the lines of those I just mentioned.
	28	+
	29	+
	30	+
	31	+====AND Land is the only meaningful starting point – anything else is a palliative that was never seriously intended to change ANYTHING for colonized peoples – the violence of invasion is reasserted each day of occupation which is a justification for why this has to be our first act in the round - there is no net benefit to the perm since land is the end all be all====
	32	+
	33	+**Tuck and Gaztambide-Fernandez ’13** (EVE TUCK and RUBÉN A. GAZTAMBIDE-FERNÁNDEZ, "Curriculum, Replacement, and Settler Futurity," Journal of Curriculum Theorizing, Vol. 29, No. 1, 2013, p. 72-89) ~~m leap~~
	34	+Settler colonialism is the specific formation of colonialism in which the colonizer comes to stay
	35	+AND
	36	+becomes property. Settlers must also import chattel slaves, who must be kept

EntryDate

...	...	@@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
	1	+2016-12-02 20:26:09.968

Judge

...	...	@@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
	1	+all

Opponent

...	...	@@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
	1	+all

ParentRound

...	...	@@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
	1	+4

Round

...	...	@@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
	1	+1

Team

...	...	@@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
	1	+Palo Alto Neg

Title

...	...	@@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
	1	+Nov dec colonialism

Tournament

...	...	@@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
	1	+doesnt matter