Changes for page Palo Alto Neg
Last modified by Administrator on 2017/08/29 03:39
Summary
-
Objects (2 modified, 1 added, 0 removed)
Details
- Caselist.RoundClass[2]
-
- EntryDate
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,1 @@ 1 -2016-10-08 21:13:24. 9321 +2016-10-08 21:13:24.0
- Caselist.RoundClass[3]
-
- EntryDate
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,1 @@ 1 -2016-10-08 21:14:33. 41 +2016-10-08 21:14:33.0
- Caselist.CitesClass[5]
-
- Cites
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,5 @@ 1 +The aff must defend the topic as a general principle. To clarify, the aff may not specify the location of the affirmative and must defend countries. 2 + 3 +A. Interpretation – The affirmative debater must link all of their offense to a comprehensive normative theory that entails the truth or falsity of all normative propositions rather than A) link into a narrow principle which is justified by broader theory B) ink into a broader theory they didn’t justify; your moral framework cannot just appeal to some feature that appeals to all theories, rather it must be derived from a single theory; spirit over text because semantic I meets allow for more abuse when there’s already a deficit to fairness 4 + 5 +A is the interpretation the opponent must respond to newly asked questions in cx - EntryDate
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +2016-10-08 21:14:35.50 - Judge
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +all - Opponent
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +all - ParentRound
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +3 - Round
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +1 - Team
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +Palo Alto Neg - Title
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +interps - Tournament
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +all