Summary

• Objects (0 modified, 0 added, 1 removed)
  • Caselist.CitesClass[1]

Details

Caselist.CitesClass[1]

Cites

...	...	@@ -1,15 +1,0 @@
1		-Basically don't extemp shells vs me please its kind of fucked up
2		-
3		-Debaters must disclose and flash all theory shells they read regardless of whether they were exempted or not.
4		-B is the violation: I didn't get anything from them or they were missing parts like warrants for no rvis
5		-C are the standards.
6		-1. Ableism: I am dysgrafic meaning that writing things down and taking in information verbally is almost impossible. In circuit debate we speak at such high speeds that my flows are bound to look disastrous without a document for me to reference to. This puts me at a significant disadvantage and controls the internal link to clash and education since it ruins the way in which I am able to engage my opponent . Supercharged cause they read a theory shell and the line by line is super important bc if I drop one drop the debater warrant they will just extend that one and I'll end up losing the round- trust me I've tried before.
7		-2. Reciprocity: I have shared all my documents with my opponent whereas they haven’t this controls the internal link to fairness since it means we start at different odds to win.
8		-D are the voters
9		-Drop the debater on this issue specifically because it actually is proportional when one side is trying to take advantage of the disability of another-
10		-and they make the space unsafe which is an independent reason why this is so severe as they are essentially telling me you should lose on something you cant refute or you should leave. When losing and leaving are the two options left something has certainly gone round and as an educator and judge you must uphold safety above all else.
11		-And use in round abuse since its the only abuse that is in your jurisdiction to vote on since you are only going to see this one round with these unique circumstances.
12		-And
13		-
14		-And no reasonability its to likely to connect with my judges since of normalcy making the judge more lenient subconsciously against me so evaluating on competing interps is the only way for the round to be adjudicated fairly its also key to determinging whose in the right and wrong whereas reasnobility probes debaters to give up on argumentations and go for appeals of emotion.
15		-And you can get the RVI if you concede the violation and meet the shell with your counter interp.

EntryDate

...	...	@@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1		-2016-09-17 16:25:58.0

Judge

...	...	@@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1		-chris Taylor

Opponent

...	...	@@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1		-idk

ParentRound

...	...	@@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1		-0

Round

...	...	@@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1		-2

Team

...	...	@@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1		-Palo Alto Neg

Title

...	...	@@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1		-Dysgrafia theory

Tournament

...	...	@@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1		-Greenhill