Summary

• Objects (0 modified, 0 added, 1 removed)
  • Caselist.CitesClass[16]

Details

Caselist.CitesClass[16]

Cites

...	...	@@ -1,73 +1,0 @@
1		-====The judge should endorse our disruption of colleges and debate itself. The crippled body is a epistemic prerequisite to dominant modes of knowledge production and our performances in debate provide liberatory potential for the space itself. ====
2		-Campbell 3 Fiona Anne Kumari Campbell, The Great Divide: Ableism and Technologies of Disability Production, 2003
3		-Our discussion engages the imagination by playing dangerously (yet cautiously) with matters of
4		-AND
5		-~~.. a true esteeming of the Cripple ~~disabled~~ body" (1994
6		-
7		-
8		-====Your role is to be an educator who challenges dominant ableist mindsets. Endorsing our methodology causes a spillover into our everyday lives; ====
9		-Beckett 13 - Angharad Anti-oppressive pedagogy and¶ disability: possibilities and challenges, School of Sociology and Social Policy, University of Leeds -
10		-
11		-
12		-====Serious and systemic disability discrimination
13		-in both camps’ i.e.¶ ‘oppressed’ and ‘privileged’.====
14		-
15		-
16		-====And you have an obligation to make debate safe and inclusive for all Smith ^^ ^^’13, ====
17		-\"It will be uncomfortable
18		- risking such an endeavor is necessary."
19		-
20		-
21		-====Challenging the assemblage of the body in disability in educational spaces like debate is an epistemic and ontological prerequisite to analyzing all other impacts and truths Ervelles ^^ ^^2K, ====
22		-For example, critical theorists of education
23		-as the cultural project of schools."
24		-
25		-
26		-=Part 2 is the closed mouth=
27		-
28		-
29		-====The resolution asks us to discuss the value of free speech as a policy option for universities, but that misses the point. Forcing disabled debaters to justify procedural justice promote political actions and roleplay positions of power in an emancipatory project internalizes ableism and self-oppresses us. ====
30		-Campbell 3 Fiona Anne Kumari Campbell, The Great Divide: Ableism and Technologies of Disability Production, 2003
31		-In the opening pages of States of Injury: Power and Freedom in Late Modernity
32		-AND
33		-in law, that is, renderings of disability as a personal tragedy232.
34		-
35		-
36		-====AND THE VERY OPERATION OF DEMOCRACY, PERSONAL OPINIONS, AND ACTIVE CITIZENSHIP WITHIN IT IS PRINCIPLED ON THE ABLE BODIED. THE IDEA OF FREE SPEECH PRESUPPOSES THAT A) SOMEONE IS LISTENING CLOSE ENOUGH TO CARE B) WE HAVE AUTONOMY AND C) WE HAVE A VOICE TO SPEAK UP WITH, ALL OF WHICH ARE EXCLUDED FOR DISABLED PEOPLE. RAISING OUR VOICE WILL JUST CONFLATE REPRESENTATION AND ASSOCIATION WITHIN THE SYSTEM that institutionally kills us or casts us aside to be forgotten,====
37		-Breckenridge and Volger 11 (Carol Appadurai is an Associate Professor of History, The New School Candace Vogler is an associate professor in the Department of Philosophy at the University of Chicago, where she teaches ethics, social and political philosophy, and gender and sexuality studies., "The Critical Limits of Embodiment: Disability's Criticism", Public Culture, Volume 13, Number 3, Fall 2011) DR 15
38		-Disability studies teaches that an assumed able body is crucial to the smooth operation of
39		-AND
40		-people unsettle ideals of social organization as freely chosen expressions of mutual desire.
41		-
42		-
43		-=Part 3 is the method=
44		-
45		-
46		-====I will affirm the method of Actor Network Theory as the way to engage today's debate. Actor Network Theory or ANT begins with identification of power structures and how they link to various domains and engagements in order to disrupt those networks ====
47		-Campbell 3 Fiona Anne Kumari Campbell, The Great Divide: Ableism and Technologies of Disability Production, 2003
48		-Actor Network Theory (ANT), sometimes known as the sociology of translation, is
49		-AND
50		-stakeholders, the failure/success process and questions of compliance and consensus.
51		-
52		-
53		-====And, ANT is a prerequisite to exploring relationships and provides the best ontological method to disrupting forms of knowledge to embrace disability ====
54		-Campbell 3 Fiona Anne Kumari Campbell, The Great Divide: Ableism and Technologies of Disability Production, 2003
55		-
56		-
57		-====The newly emergent field of
58		-, hybrids of nature and culture" (10====
59		-
60		-
61		-====AND ANT IS AN INTERSECTIONAL AND ASSEMBLIDGE APPROACH THAT DISSEMBLES SPACE, POWER AND ORGANISATIONS- THAT'S A PRERQUISITE TO REVOLUTION AND OTHER FORMS OF OPPRESSION MULLER 16====
62		-Assemblages and Actor-networks: Rethinking Socio-material Power, Politics and Space MARTIN MULLER 16 UNIVERSITY OF BIRGINHAM http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/store/10.1111/gec3.12192/asset/gec312192.pdf;jsessionid=08345ACFDCB165F86B4D01CC764B4AEF.f04t02?v=1andt=ixuqy2joands=04339ef3256d7d1c302bf0a3e724e9940baafc59javascript:void(null);
63		-Both assemblage thinking and ANT ha(s) much to say about the spatial
64		-AND
65		-it points to barriers and paths not taken as avenues for further engagement.
66		-
67		-
68		-=Part 4 is out of sight out of mind=
69		-
70		-
71		-====Debaters must be held accountable for the discourse they produce in round. Judges need to be active allies and engage in a process of disrupting the flow in light of a teachable moment. Vincent ^^ ^^13, ====
72		-Debaters must be held accountable f
73		- argument solely on the flow.

EntryDate

...	...	@@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1		-2017-01-14 18:14:34.0

Judge

...	...	@@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1		-any

Opponent

...	...	@@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1		-any

ParentRound

...	...	@@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1		-13

Round

...	...	@@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1		-1

Team

...	...	@@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1		-Palo Alto Aff

Title

...	...	@@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1		-JAN FEB harvard westalke ac

Tournament

...	...	@@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1		-any on nov dec