Summary

• Objects (1 modified, 1 added, 0 removed)
  • Caselist.RoundClass[14]
  • Caselist.CitesClass[17]

Details

Caselist.RoundClass[14]

EntryDate

...	...	@@ -1,1 +1,1 @@
1		-2017-01-16 00:47:39.796
	1	+2017-01-16 00:47:39.0

Caselist.CitesClass[17]

Cites

...	...	@@ -1,0 +1,68 @@
	1	+====\====
	2	+
	3	+
	4	+=Part 1 is framing=
	5	+**Voting aff is an affirmation of the method of taking responsibility to listen to colonized voices. **
	6	+
	7	+
	8	+**====The content of knowledge we present, even though I am white, has to recognize and attempt to de center western modes of thought from our educational spaces. Jones 4 ====**
	9	+A fundamental problem ,,, over five hundred years.
	10	+
	11	+
	12	+====Western education is the worst impact, Tribes are effectually excluded from political processes. Our introduction of an indigenous discussion is productive in order to have the full spectrum of a policy and is uniquely educational to challenge debate discussion norms that privilege non-indigenous perspectives. Comes before other education claims. **Smith 7**^^ ^^** ====**
	13	+As I am arguing, every ... reinforce these 'myths'
	14	+
	15	+
	16	+**====Endorsement of the US’ neocolonial rules is the root of all violence. Anything that does not meet the Eurocentric idea of a human, I.e. a white, heterosexual, cisgendered, ablebodied male is always devalued and excluded. Eurocentrism is the reason there is a 90 attrition rate amongst tribes. Quijano 2K**^^ ^^**====**
	17	+Parallel to the historical ...if not always primitive.
	18	+of Islamic thinkers.
	19	+75
	20	+
	21	+
	22	+====And, as a judge, you are an educator and have an obligation to evaluate my impacts first in order to preserve the value of debate as a whole. Smith 13^^ ^^ ====
	23	+"It will be uncomfortable, /...endeavor is necessary."
	24	+
	25	+
	26	+**====The role of the ballot is to vote for the debater who best methodologically rejects nuclear colonialism. Including the indigenous voice is key to change**. ====
	27	+
	28	+**Endres 9 **
	29	+Endres, Danielle. "Communication and Critical/Cultural Studies." The Rhetoric of Nuclear Colonialism: Rhetorical Exclusion of American Indian Arguments in the Yucca Mountain Nuclear Waste Siting Decision: Vol 6, No 1. N.p., 17 Feb. 2009. http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/14791420802632103.
	30	+Nuclear weapons and nuclear power have devastating consequences for local populations surrounding the sites of
	31	+AND
	32	+rhetorical strategies of nuclear colonialism, their consequences, and their continuing legacies.
	33	+
	34	+
	35	+=PART 2 IS THE PLAN=
	36	+FIRST PLAN TEXT: Native American tribes and US federal government will prohibit uranium nuclear power facilities which either pollute or store pollution near or in native American reserves.
	37	+And all discursive arguments and t /theory interps must be read in cx so we spend 20 seconds on something both debaters find permissible rather than devaluing the entire round with a new layer.
	38	+
	39	+
	40	+=PART 3 is a history lesson=
	41	+
	42	+
	43	+
	44	+====The history of nuclear energy policy is tied back to nuclear colonialism. ====
	45	+IEN 2 "Indigenous Anti-Nuclear Statement: Yucca Mountain and Private Fuel Storage at Skull Valley." Indigenous Environmental Network. N.p., 14 Apr. 2002 http://www.ienearth.org/indigenous-anti-nuclear-statement-yucca-mountain-and-private-fuel-storage-at-skull-valley/.
	46	+The nuclear industry has waged an undeclared war against our Indigenous peoples and Pacific Islanders
	47	+AND
	48	+peoples. Indigenous peoples have already made countless sacrifices for this country’s nuclear programs
	49	+
	50	+
	51	+====The impact is cultural genocide; indigenous lands are key to the native way of life ====
	52	+Edwards 11 ~~Nelta Edwards, associate professor in the Department of Sociology at the University of Alaska-Anchorage, "Nuclear Colonialism and the Social Construction of Landscape in Alaska," Environmental Justice 4.2 (2011): 109-114, http://online.liebertpub.com/doi/pdfplus/10.1089/env.2010.0023 // myost~~
	53	+It is important to examine the justifications and ramifications surrounding the choice of particular sites
	54	+AND
	55	+learned it—to keep my land clean continues in Inupiaq.’’39
	56	+
	57	+
	58	+====Nuclear energy coerces and deceives native Americans into thinking uranium and nuclear energy are both profitable and good for them. Then actively lies about the dangers and results of the mining. Itr equires genocide plain and simple.====
	59	+ Grinde 1995
	60	+Donald A. Grinde Prof. of American Studies and History, U. of Buffalo and Bruce E. Johansen Prof. of Communication, U. of Nebraska, Ecocide of Native America: Environmental Destruction of Indian Lands and Peoples. Sante Fe: Clear Light Publishers. pp. 206-218 (1995). AT
	61	+About half the recoverable...– in colonized places.
	62	+
	63	+
	64	+=Part 4 is solvency=
	65	+
	66	+
	67	+====Governmental recognition of past injustice to Natives is valuable —it develops intercultural dialog that takes responsibility and shifts the collective identity in a way that initiates the healing process Tsosie 7^^ ^^ ====
	68	+Until this speech, ...healing in motion.

EntryDate

...	...	@@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
	1	+2017-01-16 00:47:41.914

Judge

...	...	@@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
	1	+Paroma

Opponent

...	...	@@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
	1	+IDK

ParentRound

...	...	@@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
	1	+14

Round

...	...	@@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
	1	+1

Team

...	...	@@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
	1	+Palo Alto Aff

Title

...	...	@@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
	1	+Sept October native ac

Tournament

...	...	@@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
	1	+GreenHIll