Changes for page Oakwood Wolf Valdes Aff
Last modified by Administrator on 2017/08/29 03:38
Change comment:
There is no comment for this version
Summary
-
Objects (1 modified, 1 added, 0 removed)
Details
- Caselist.RoundClass[13]
-
- EntryDate
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,1 @@ 1 -2016-12-16 17:04:54. 591 +2016-12-16 17:04:54.0
- Caselist.CitesClass[11]
-
- Cites
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,66 @@ 1 +===Part I: Agency=== 2 +Any moral theory presupposes the existence of agents—those capable of engaging in that ethical system. Denying the right to free speech would be a contradiction of agency since debating about things in the first place means we concede this privilege. Hoppe : Hoppe, H. -H. (1993). On the Ultimate Justification of the Ethics of Private Property. In The Economics and Ethics of Private Property: Studies in Political Economy and Philosophy. Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers. https://mises.org/books/ec11111111111111111111111``````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````onomicsethics.pdf 3 +It must be considered 4 +AND 5 + he was disputing 6 +As long as argumentation exists, the only thing we can do is recognize people's exclusive control over their property rights. Hoppe2 7 +Argumentation is a 8 +AND 9 + admit its truth). 10 + 11 + 12 +====Impacts:==== 13 + 14 + 15 +====By engaging in a debate, it is a performative contradiction to deny argumentative ethics==== 16 + 17 + 18 +====This precedes my framework but does not contradict it—the standard is a guide to action, but first it's necessary to define moral agency before engaging in ethics.==== 19 + 20 + 21 +===Part II: Framework=== 22 + 23 + 24 +====1. Phenomenal introspection is reliable and proves that util is objectively valid.==== 25 +**Sinhababu** Neil (National University of Singapore) "The epistemic argument for hedonism" http://philpapers.org/archive/SINTEA-3 accessed 2-4-16 JW 26 +The Odyssey's treatment 27 +AND 28 +not egoistic hedonism. 29 + 30 + 31 +====This outweighs other frameworks.==== 32 +**Sinhababu 2** Neil (National University of Singapore) "The epistemic argument for hedonism" http://philpapers.org/archive/SINTEA-3 accessed 2-4-16 JW 33 +A full moral 34 +AND 35 +through reliable processes. 36 + 37 + 38 +====2. First principles of morality are incapable of proof since they are assumptions that cannot be deduced from any other proposition, so we can only look to the best evidence of what is desirable which tautologically justifies util.==== 39 +**Mill** John Stuart Mill "Utilitarianism" 1863 40 +It has already 41 +AND 42 +criteria of morality. 43 + 44 + 45 +====Thus, the standard is maximizing happiness. Refer the standard==== 46 + 47 + 48 +===Part III: Offense=== 49 + 50 + 51 +====1. No speech can be restricted on the basis of utility since the truth of an opinion is part of its utility—that is, whether it will be useful for people to believe a certain thing is in itself a "matter of opinion" which must be discussed. Mill:==== 52 +But those who 53 +AND 54 + death as a criminal. 55 + 56 +===Part IV: Logic=== 57 +To say something is permitted is not to say that there is no possibility of a prohibition; rather it just matters that it is permitted under one locus of duty. A) This is true of obligations because the existence of an obligation doesn't mean that there can't be another obligation to do something else, as an obligation is just a locus of duty. B) Proving the resolution true under a specific index is sufficient to affirm regardless of any other type of index that negates Rodl^^ ^^: Oakwood AM ^^ ^^Rödl, Sebastian. Self-Consciousness, Harvard University Press, 2007. pg. 71. 58 +This view 59 +AND 60 + myself to p. 61 + 62 + 63 +====A legal obligation is sufficient to affirm independent of moral considerations. Legal obligations are a separate locus of duty. Glos^^ ^^: Oakwood AM George E. Glos, The Normative Theory of Law, 11 Wm. and Mary L. Rev. 151 (1969), http://scholarship.law.wm.edu/wmlr/vol11/iss1/6. SM==== 64 +The mutual relation 65 +AND 66 +to fight and kill). - EntryDate
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +2016-12-16 17:04:55.964 - Judge
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +Jonathan Alston - Opponent
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +East Chapel Hill AM - ParentRound
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +13 - Round
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +1 - Team
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +Oakwood Wolf Valdes Aff - Title
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +Util AC - Tournament
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +Blake