Changes for page Oakwood Weiner Neg
Summary
-
Objects (0 modified, 0 added, 13 removed)
- Caselist.CitesClass[12]
- Caselist.CitesClass[13]
- Caselist.CitesClass[14]
- Caselist.CitesClass[15]
- Caselist.CitesClass[16]
- Caselist.CitesClass[17]
- Caselist.CitesClass[18]
- Caselist.RoundClass[5]
- Caselist.RoundClass[6]
- Caselist.RoundClass[7]
- Caselist.RoundClass[8]
- Caselist.RoundClass[9]
- Caselist.RoundClass[11]
Details
- Caselist.CitesClass[12]
-
- Cites
-
... ... @@ -1,14 +1,0 @@ 1 -Its the first tournament of the topic so coming up to me in prelims and asking me what I'm reading is very annoying and you probably won't get an answer and you need to chill and be fine with that. I will be breaking new almost every round and if I do read something it will go up on the wiki. Thats it. 2 - 3 -But you should tell me what ur reading 4 -tell me... 5 - 6 -1. ROTB text (if ur reading one) 7 -2. Exact CP and K alt texts 8 -3. Framework specifics/standard text of the NC or the K 9 -4. DA's (coal, drought, warming etc) 10 -5. FULL T INTERP TEXTS! (if you have bidirectional ones, tell me before the round what version of the aff is topical/ the one you want me to defend, Whole res, or plan? and i may take it into account to avoid a T debate) 11 - 12 -so yeah 13 -I LOVE READING DISCLOSURE THEORY! 14 -Interpretation: debaters must disclose all broken positions (including ACs, NCs, DAs, CPs and Ks) on the NDCA LD 2016-2017 wiki under their own name or another debaters WITH NOTIFICATION THAT UR READING FROM THEIR WIKI, school, and correct side with cites, tags, the first three and the last three words of all cards read at least an hour before the round begins. - EntryDate
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -2016-11-03 22:39:45.0 - Judge
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -NA - Opponent
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -NA - ParentRound
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -5 - Round
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -Quads - Team
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -Oakwood Weiner Neg - Title
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -IMPORTANT NOTE FOR MINNEAPPLE - Tournament
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -Minneapple
- Caselist.CitesClass[13]
-
- Cites
-
... ... @@ -1,30 +1,0 @@ 1 -Negate means …debate is structured. 2 -The structure of action can only be explained through practical reason. Rodl 3 -Categories of the Temporal. An inquiry into the forms of the finite understanding, Harvard University Press 2012. https://voices.uchicago.edu/germanphilosophy/papers/ 4 -Calculation from desire …be doing B. 5 - 6 -This outweighs the aff framework. 7 - 8 -A. 9 -B. 10 -This coopts actor specificity—societies are just collections of individuals acting through reasoning. 11 -It is …through their reasoning. 12 - 13 -Rational agency requires you identify with the principle of choice that causes your action. Korsgaard 14 -(Christine, “Taking the Law into Our Own Hands: Kant on the Right to Revolution,” in The Constitution of Agency: Essays on Practical Reason and Moral Psychology) OS bracketed for gender 15 -The first step …on which you act. 16 - 17 -Thus, the sufficient negative burden is to prove that the res is impossible here are a shit ton of reasons why. 18 - 19 -1. A...impossible. 20 -2. Government...achieved. 21 -3. To ...etc. 22 -4. There’s...principle. 23 -5. Countries...policy. 24 -6. It’s...idea. 25 -7. We...reasoning. 26 -8. The universe is limitless and infinitely expanding, probably means that any limit is impossible and a useless exercise of moral reasoning. Dictionary.com 2016: 27 -9. Law’s...inconsistent. 28 -10. We...nullified. 29 -11. There...inconsistent 30 -12. They...nullified. - EntryDate
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -2016-11-19 05:52:23.0 - Judge
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -NA - Opponent
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -NA - ParentRound
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -6 - Round
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -Quads - Team
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -Oakwood Weiner Neg - Title
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -U of A NC ND 2016 - Tournament
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -Minneapple NA
- Caselist.CitesClass[14]
-
- Cites
-
... ... @@ -1,60 +1,0 @@ 1 -===1NC: Crime DA === 2 - 3 - 4 -====Crime is low now.==== 5 -**Cooke 15** Charles C. "Careful with the Panic: Violent Crime and Gun Crime Are Both Dropping" National Review November 30^^th^^ 2015 http://www.nationalreview.com/corner/427758/careful-panic-violent-crime-and-gun-crime-are-both-dropping-charles-c-w-cooke JW 6 -Since Friday’s shooting in Colorado Springs, I have spoken to a number of people 7 -AND 8 -getting better. Let’s be circumspect about tinkering and prodding at our success. 9 - 10 - 11 -====Without qualified immunity, police will be unable to effectively enforce law.==== 12 -**King 16** Andrew (assistant prosecuting attorney) "KEEP QUALIFIED IMMUNITY…FOR NOW" July 1^^st^^ 2016 Mimesis Law http://mimesislaw.com/fault-20lines/keep-qualified-immunity-for-now/11010 JW 13 -If you want to see active policing plummet, tell law enforcement officers they will 14 -AND 15 -. Let’s figure out a better one before tearing down the old one. 16 - 17 - 18 -====Qualified immunity is key to deterring crime—multiple warrants.==== 19 -**Rosen 5** Michael (attorney in San Diego at Fish and Richardson PC, an intellectual property law fIrm. In 2003-2004 he served as a law clerk to The Honorable Marilyn L. Huff, Chief Judge of the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of California. He graduated from Harvard Law School in 2003) "A Qualified Defense: In Support of the Doctrine of Qualified Immunity in Excessive Force Cases, With Some Suggestions for its Improvement" Golden Gate University Law Review Volume 35 Issue 2 Article 2 January 2005 http://digitalcommons.law.ggu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1899andcontext=ggulrev JW 20 -It is hard to deny that the more time police officers spend at trial defending 21 -AND 22 -immunity can play in reducing unnecessary costs and in improving deterrence of crime. 23 - 24 - 25 -====Active policing reduces crime.==== 26 -**NIJ 16** National Institute of Justice "Five Things About Deterrence" May 2016 http://nij.gov/five-things/pages/deterrence.aspx JW 27 -Does punishment prevent crime? If so, how, and to what extent? 28 -AND 29 -capital punishment increases, decreases, or has no effect on homicide rates." 30 - 31 - 32 -====Low crime is key to soft power.==== 33 -**Falk 12** Richard (United Nations Special Rapporteur on Palestinian human rights) "When soft power is hard" Al Jazeera July 28^^th^^ 2012 http://www.aljazeera.com/indepth/opinion/2012/07/201272212435524825.html 34 -This unabashed avowal of imperial goals is the main thesis of the article, perhaps 35 -AND 36 -appear that the adage, "disease unknown, cure unknown", applies. 37 - 38 - 39 -====Soft power is high now.==== 40 -**Nye 15** Joseph (Distinguished Service Professor, Harvard Kennedy School of Government; Author, Is the American Century Over?) "Charting the Next American Century" March 4^^th^^ 2015 Council on Foreign Relations http://www.cfr.org/united-states/charting-next-american-century/p36194~~#ER JW 41 -NYE: This is what I think is crucial, which is the United States 42 -AND 43 -or entity, that has as much soft power as the United States. 44 - 45 - 46 -====Soft power solves multiple existential threats.==== 47 -**Lagon 11** Mark P. (International Relations and Security Chair at Georgetown University's Master of Science in Foreign Service Program and adjunct senior fellow at the Council on Foreign Relations. He is the former US Ambassador-at-Large to Combat Trafficking in Persons at the US Department of State) "The Value of Values: Soft Power Under Obama" World Affairs Journal Sept/Oct 2011 http://www.worldaffairsjournal.org/article/value-values-soft-power-under-obama~~#ER 48 -Despite large economic challenges, two protracted military expeditions, and the rise of China 49 -AND 50 -and soft power better than the United States, something is seriously amiss. 51 - 52 - 53 -===Impact – CJS Reform=== 54 - 55 - 56 -====Crime increases prevent imminent CJS reform.==== 57 -**American Interest 15** The American Interest "Violent Crime Wave Could Swamp Prison Reform" American Interest September 2^^nd^^ 2015 http://www.the-american-interest.com/2015/09/02/violent-crime-wave-could-swamp-prison-reform/ 58 -We aren’t criminologists at Via Meadia, so we won’t wade into the fierce debate 59 -AND 60 -boom may be. Posted: Sep 2, 2015 9:11 AM - EntryDate
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -2016-12-01 20:13:35.0 - Judge
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -NA - Opponent
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -NA - ParentRound
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -7 - Round
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -Quads - Team
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -Oakwood Weiner Neg - Title
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -Crime DA ND 2016 - Tournament
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -Glenbrooks
- Caselist.CitesClass[15]
-
- Cites
-
... ... @@ -1,65 +1,0 @@ 1 -==Pt 1: Framework == 2 - 3 - 4 -====1^^st^^ Humans construct all meaning and value. Two warrants:==== 5 - 6 - 7 -====A) There are no overarching moral doctrines to guide morality – only those we impose in the state of nature. PARRISH 04:==== 8 -1. Rick Parrish 2. 2004 3. The Johns Hopkins University Press 4. Derrida's Economy of Violence in Hobbes' Social Contract 5. 1/5/16 6. Pg 4-7. 7. Rick Parrish teaches at Loyola University New Orleans. His current research is focused on the play of violence and respect within justice. He can be reached at parrish@loyno.edu http://muse.jhu.edu/login?auth=0andtype=summaryandurl=/journals/theory'and'event/v007/7.4parrish.html 9 -Perhaps the single most telling quote from Hobbes on this point comes from The Philosophical 10 -AND 11 -things by humans in acts of creation rather than discovered as extrinsic facts." 12 - 13 - 14 -====B) It is impossible to compare between normative claims since those claims start from functionally different claims, making it impossible to rationally debate between frameworks.^^^^JOYCE:==== 15 -Joyce, Richard. Myth of Morality. Port Chester, NY, USA: Cambridge University Press, 2002. p 45-47. 16 -This distinction between what is accepted from within an institution, and "stepping out 17 -AND 18 -count as evidence that would sway the debate one way or the other. 19 - 20 - 21 -====This precludes any derivation of an argument since those arguments are functionally impossible to compare themselves, making debate impossible.==== 22 - 23 - 24 -====The conclusion is adherence to the sovereign: since the sovereign's role is to provide a common meaning to notions like morality, the question of morality is the SAME question as the nature of the sovereign. PARRISH 2: ==== 25 -1. Rick Parrish 2. 2004 3. The Johns Hopkins University Press 4. Derrida's Economy of Violence in Hobbes' Social Contract 5. 1/5/16 6. Pg 4-7. 7. Rick Parrish teaches at Loyola University New Orleans. His current research is focused on the play of violence and respect within justice. He can be reached at parrish@loyno.edu http://muse.jhu.edu/login?auth=0andtype=summaryandurl=/journals/theory'and'event/v007/7.4parrish.html 26 -All of the foregoing points to the conclusion that in the commonwealth the sovereign's first 27 -AND 28 -directions"60 and fall inevitably into the violence of the natural condition." 29 - 30 - 31 -====If there is no sovereign, we can’t understand any relevant assertions of language, so all assertions would be true that’s Parrish 1 – other things being false. This is because the truth-value of a definition is ultimately arbitrary. We may be able to bicker over technicalities, but the only real way to determine what a word means is an appeal to authority. Unless there is an ultimate authority in the form of a sovereign that can express its will, there is only interpretive chaos. This also means that the contextualization of the aff as limit is without a brightline since there is no logical cutoff point for which we can stop caring about qualified immunity. And if there is no sovereign, then we can’t understand who is right with competing claims. Which means the NC fw is a side constraint to the aff. ==== 32 - 33 - 34 -====And, individuals don’t have rights against the state meaning that they cannot hold police as state actors accountable, so even if we do the aff it is useless because indaviduals ought not open civil suit against the police. FEINBURG 70:==== 35 -Première publication dans The journal of Value Inquiry, Vol.4 (1970), pp.243-57; repris dans Joel Feinberg, Rights, justice, and the bounds of Liberty, Priceton University Press, Priceton, 1980, pp.159-184. La version originale de cet article contient des italiques omis par cette version numérique. 36 -Feinberg, Joel (a political and social philosopher who did groundbreaking work in the fields of individual rights and the authority of the state), and Jan Narveson. "The nature and value of rights." The Journal of Value Inquiry 4.4 (1970): pg 247. URL: http://link.springer.com/article/10.10072FBF00137935 Date Accessed: Feb 13 2016 37 -Surely, one might ask, rights have to come in somewhere, if we 38 -AND 39 -in the words of David: "To Thee only have I sinned." 40 - 41 - 42 -====States define moral force, so, conditions that restrict sovereign choice are bad by definition since whenever they would come up they would be defined as wrong. But that’s just what rights are, so my framework means we can’t have rights.==== 43 - 44 - 45 -====Thus the standard is consistency with the power of the sovereign==== 46 - 47 - 48 -==Contentions== 49 - 50 - 51 -====1. Qualified immunity allows police to carry out there duty to the state and gives them power without being accountable. Schott 12: ==== 52 -Qualified Immunity: How it Protects Law Enforcement Officers By Richard G. Schott J.D. September 2012 https://leb.fbi.gov/2012/september/qualified-immunity-how-it-protects-law-enforcement-officers 53 -Law enforcement personnel expose themselves to risks every day. Those risks include the possibility 54 -AND 55 -the Air Force in violation of his First Amendment and other statutory rights. 56 - 57 - 58 -====2. This means that qualified immunity is integral in police performing duty towards the state without being held accountable which means better control over citizenry, we need to limit legislative power of the people, the state needs an unconditional monopolization on force **Fichte 2:====** 59 -J.G. Fichte, "Foundations of Natural Right: According to the Principles of the Wissenschaftslehre". Edited by Frederick Neuhouser, Cornell University. Translated by Michael Baur, Fordham University. Cambridge University Press, 2000. 60 -This common will must be equipped with a power — and indeed a superior power 61 -AND 62 -to keep~~; and therefore there exists the most perfect equilibrium of right. 63 - 64 - 65 -====3. Violations of soverign power necessarily come 1^^st^^ because only those can affect how we act in ethical situations meaning its only possible to give credence to police over citizenry. ==== - EntryDate
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -2016-12-01 20:17:02.0 - Judge
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -NA - Opponent
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -NA - ParentRound
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -8 - Round
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -Quads - Team
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -Oakwood Weiner Neg - Title
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -Hobbes NC ND 2016 - Tournament
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -Minneapple
- Caselist.CitesClass[16]
-
- Cites
-
... ... @@ -1,18 +1,0 @@ 1 -All my broken positions are on my wiki, also anything on Jack Warehams wiki is fair game. IF I AM BREAKING NEW I WILL TELL YOU, IF YOU INQUIRE. Also I only disclose past NR's or the 1NC strat if you disclose; Tell me; 2 - 3 -1. ROTB text (if ur reading one) 4 -2. EXACT PLAN TEXT (if ur reading a plan) 5 -3. Framework specifics/standard text 6 -4. Advantages 7 - 8 -If I'm affirming i against you tell me; 9 - 10 -1. ROTB text (if ur reading one) 11 -2. Exact CP and K alt texts 12 -3. Framework specifics/standard text of the NC or the K 13 -4. DA's (coal, drought, warming etc) 14 -5. FULL T INTERP TEXTS! (if you have bidirectional ones, tell me before the round what version of the aff is topical/ the one you want me to defend, Whole res, or plan? and i may take it into account to avoid a T debate also goes for spec shells) 15 -so yeah 16 - 17 -So yeah I LOVE READING DISCLOSURE THEORY! 18 -Interpretation: debaters must disclose all broken positions (including ACs, NCs, DAs, CPs and Ks) on the NDCA LD 2016-2017 wiki under their own name or another debaters WITH NOTIFICATION THAT UR READING FROM THEIR WIKI, school, and correct side with cites, tags, the first three and the last three words of all cards read at least an hour before the round begins. - EntryDate
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -2016-12-02 21:11:58.0 - Judge
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -NA - Opponent
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -NA - ParentRound
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -9 - Round
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -Quads - Team
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -Oakwood Weiner Neg - Title
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -IMPORTANT NOTE FOR ALTA - Tournament
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -Alta
- Caselist.CitesClass[17]
-
- Cites
-
... ... @@ -1,19 +1,0 @@ 1 -====Creating the role of the judge as an educator that needs to enforce certain social norms forces the judge into the coercive role that makes any attempts at meaningful education pointless and actually reintrenches an authoritarian logic of violence==== 2 -Thomas Rickert, "Hands Up, You’re Free": Composition in a Post-Oedipal World, 2001 // DM 3 -An example of the connection between violence and pedagogy is implicit in the notion of 4 -AND 5 -also opens up a cynical distance toward the writing pro duced in class. 6 - 7 - 8 -====Outweighs: a) any substantive This turns case.==== 9 -Thomas Rickert, "Hands Up, You’re Free": Composition in a Post-Oedipal World, 2001 // DM 10 -This essay will employ Deleuze's and Zizek's theories to illustrate the limitations of writing pedagogies 11 -AND 12 -observes, "nothing is more aggressive than the desire to serve the other 13 - 14 - 15 -====Outweighs: a) even if critical b) even if it...pedagogy from its warrants.==== 16 - 17 -Drop the Debater 18 -A. The abuse has...Discourse damage is irreversible. 19 -B. Drop the debate...future oppressive practices - EntryDate
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -2016-12-03 14:26:04.0 - Judge
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -Liz Letak - Opponent
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -Lynbrook NA - ParentRound
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -10 - Round
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -4 - Team
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -Oakwood Weiner Neg - Title
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -Rickert K ND 16 - Tournament
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -Alta
- Caselist.CitesClass[18]
-
- Cites
-
... ... @@ -1,68 +1,0 @@ 1 -====A. Interpretation: The aff must specify a comprehensive role of the ballot and clarify how the round will play out under that role of the ballot in the form of a text in the 1AC. To clarify, the aff must: ==== 2 - 3 - 4 -====1. Clarify how we determine what a legitimate advocacy is and how offense links back to the role of the ballot, such as whether topicality constrains the aff advocacy or not. ==== 5 - 6 - 7 -====2. Every plank of the ROB must be warranted, just like the standard text for a normative ethical theory, and what area of debate must be warranted i.e. which assumptions we should accept and which we shouldn’t. ==== 8 - 9 - 10 -====3. Clarify what theoretical objections do and do not link to the aff, and whether or not the aff comes before theory. ==== 11 - 12 - 13 -====4. Describe how to weigh and compare between competing advocacies i.e. whether the role of the ballot is solely determined by the flow or another method of engagement. ==== 14 - 15 - 16 -====B. Violation:==== 17 - 18 - 19 -====C. Standards:==== 20 - 21 - 22 -====1. Engagement – If I...offense. Few impacts:==== 23 - 24 - 25 -====a) Education – when two ships pass in the night we don’t learn anything, education is derived from analyzing and comparing each other’s arguments, so this theory argument is specifically legitimate. Not being able to crystallize on one issue is the definition of bad education. CHOKSHI:==== 26 -Niraj Chokshi is a former staff editor at TheAtlantic.com, where he wrote about technology. He is currently freelancing How Do We Stop the Internet From Making Us Stupid? JUN 8 2010 http://www.theatlantic.com/technology/archive/2010/06/how-do-we-stop-the-internet-from-making-us-stupid/57796/ 27 -When it comes to focus, turning on the spotlight may not matter as much 28 -AND 29 -superficial thinking, how do we fight back? Carr offers some advice: 30 - 31 - 32 -====b) Resolvability – if there...a gateway issue. ==== 33 - 34 - 35 -====c) Link turns your... position can create. ==== 36 - 37 - 38 -====d) Having clearly defined parameters and guidelines on the role of the ballot debate is a prerequisite to debate itself. SHIVELY:==== 39 -Shively, Michael ~~Prof Politics at Texas AandM~~. "Partisan Politics and Political Theory" (p.181-2) 40 -The ambiguists must say "no" to—they must reject and limit— 41 -AND 42 -. In other words, contestation rests on some basic agreement or harmony. 43 - 44 - 45 -====All rules aren’t the same – agreement on the meanings of terms is not only necessary for debate but enables resistance. SHIVELY 2:==== 46 -Shively, Michael ~~Prof Politics at Texas AandM~~. "Partisan Politics and Political Theory" (p.181-2) 47 -The point may seem trite, as surely the ambiguists would agree that basic terms 48 -AND 49 -good arguments. Such agreements are simply implicit in the act of argumentation. 50 - 51 - 52 -====2. Strategy Skew – You...in your position.==== 53 - 54 - 55 -====Further, warranting every...access the ballot. ==== 56 - 57 - 58 -====Narrowing the debate to a specific question is key to effective discussion and decision-making, there’s real-world evidence. STEINBERG and FREELEY:^^ ^^==== 59 -Steinberg and Freeley 8 *Austin J. Freeley is a Boston based attorney who focuses on criminal, personal injury and civil rights law, AND **David L. Steinberg, Lecturer of Communication Studies @ U Miami, Argumentation and Debate: Critical Thinking for Reasoned Decision Making pp45- 60 -Debate is a means of settling differences, so there must be a difference of 61 -AND 62 -a particular point of difference, which will be outlined in the following discussion 63 - 64 - 65 -====Framing: You can’t...in the AC.==== 66 - 67 - 68 -====D. Voter:==== - EntryDate
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -2016-12-03 14:44:56.0 - Judge
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -NA - Opponent
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -NA - ParentRound
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -11 - Round
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -Triples - Team
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -Oakwood Weiner Neg - Title
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -ROB SPEC - Tournament
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -Alta
- Caselist.RoundClass[5]
-
- Cites
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -12 - EntryDate
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -2016-11-03 22:39:43.0 - Judge
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -NA - Opponent
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -NA - Round
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -Quads - Tournament
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -Minneapple
- Caselist.RoundClass[6]
-
- Cites
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -13 - EntryDate
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -2016-11-19 05:52:21.0 - Judge
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -NA - Opponent
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -NA - Round
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -Quads - Tournament
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -Minneapple NA
- Caselist.RoundClass[7]
-
- Cites
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -14 - EntryDate
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -2016-12-01 20:13:31.0 - Judge
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -NA - Opponent
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -NA - Round
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -Quads - Tournament
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -Glenbrooks
- Caselist.RoundClass[8]
-
- Cites
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -15 - EntryDate
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -2016-12-01 20:16:59.0 - Judge
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -NA - Opponent
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -NA - Round
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -Quads - Tournament
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -Minneapple
- Caselist.RoundClass[9]
-
- Cites
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -16 - EntryDate
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -2016-12-02 21:11:56.0 - Judge
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -NA - Opponent
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -NA - Round
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -Quads - Tournament
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -Alta
- Caselist.RoundClass[11]
-
- Cites
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -18 - EntryDate
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -2016-12-03 14:44:54.0 - Judge
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -NA - Opponent
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -NA - Round
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -Triples - Tournament
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -Alta