Changes for page Oakwood Weiner Neg
Summary
-
Objects (1 modified, 4 added, 0 removed)
Details
- Caselist.CitesClass[12]
-
- EntryDate
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,1 @@ 1 -2016-11-03 22:3 8:16.01 +2016-11-03 22:39:45.0
- Caselist.CitesClass[13]
-
- Cites
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,30 @@ 1 +Negate means …debate is structured. 2 +The structure of action can only be explained through practical reason. Rodl 3 +Categories of the Temporal. An inquiry into the forms of the finite understanding, Harvard University Press 2012. https://voices.uchicago.edu/germanphilosophy/papers/ 4 +Calculation from desire …be doing B. 5 + 6 +This outweighs the aff framework. 7 + 8 +A. 9 +B. 10 +This coopts actor specificity—societies are just collections of individuals acting through reasoning. 11 +It is …through their reasoning. 12 + 13 +Rational agency requires you identify with the principle of choice that causes your action. Korsgaard 14 +(Christine, “Taking the Law into Our Own Hands: Kant on the Right to Revolution,” in The Constitution of Agency: Essays on Practical Reason and Moral Psychology) OS bracketed for gender 15 +The first step …on which you act. 16 + 17 +Thus, the sufficient negative burden is to prove that the res is impossible here are a shit ton of reasons why. 18 + 19 +1. A...impossible. 20 +2. Government...achieved. 21 +3. To ...etc. 22 +4. There’s...principle. 23 +5. Countries...policy. 24 +6. It’s...idea. 25 +7. We...reasoning. 26 +8. The universe is limitless and infinitely expanding, probably means that any limit is impossible and a useless exercise of moral reasoning. Dictionary.com 2016: 27 +9. Law’s...inconsistent. 28 +10. We...nullified. 29 +11. There...inconsistent 30 +12. They...nullified. - EntryDate
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +2016-11-19 05:52:23.0 - Judge
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +NA - Opponent
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +NA - ParentRound
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +6 - Round
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +Quads - Team
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +Oakwood Weiner Neg - Title
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +U of A NC ND 2016 - Tournament
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +Minneapple NA
- Caselist.RoundClass[5]
-
- Cites
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +12 - EntryDate
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +2016-11-03 22:39:43.0 - Judge
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +NA - Opponent
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +NA - Round
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +Quads - Tournament
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +Minneapple
- Caselist.RoundClass[6]
-
- Cites
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +13 - EntryDate
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +2016-11-19 05:52:21.0 - Judge
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +NA - Opponent
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +NA - Round
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +Quads - Tournament
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +Minneapple NA
- Caselist.RoundClass[7]
-
- EntryDate
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +2016-12-01 20:13:31.764 - Judge
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +NA - Opponent
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +NA - Round
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +Quads - Tournament
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +Glenbrooks