Changes for page Oakwood Weiner Neg
Summary
-
Objects (2 modified, 21 added, 0 removed)
- Caselist.CitesClass[12]
- Caselist.RoundClass[5]
- Caselist.CitesClass[13]
- Caselist.CitesClass[14]
- Caselist.CitesClass[15]
- Caselist.CitesClass[16]
- Caselist.CitesClass[18]
- Caselist.CitesClass[19]
- Caselist.CitesClass[20]
- Caselist.CitesClass[21]
- Caselist.CitesClass[22]
- Caselist.CitesClass[23]
- Caselist.CitesClass[24]
- Caselist.RoundClass[6]
- Caselist.RoundClass[7]
- Caselist.RoundClass[8]
- Caselist.RoundClass[9]
- Caselist.RoundClass[11]
- Caselist.RoundClass[12]
- Caselist.RoundClass[13]
- Caselist.RoundClass[14]
- Caselist.RoundClass[15]
- Caselist.RoundClass[16]
Details
- Caselist.CitesClass[12]
-
- EntryDate
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,1 @@ 1 -2016-11-03 22:3 8:16.01 +2016-11-03 22:39:45.0
- Caselist.RoundClass[5]
-
- EntryDate
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,1 @@ 1 -2016-11-03 22:3 8:14.01 +2016-11-03 22:39:43.0
- Caselist.CitesClass[13]
-
- Cites
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,30 @@ 1 +Negate means …debate is structured. 2 +The structure of action can only be explained through practical reason. Rodl 3 +Categories of the Temporal. An inquiry into the forms of the finite understanding, Harvard University Press 2012. https://voices.uchicago.edu/germanphilosophy/papers/ 4 +Calculation from desire …be doing B. 5 + 6 +This outweighs the aff framework. 7 + 8 +A. 9 +B. 10 +This coopts actor specificity—societies are just collections of individuals acting through reasoning. 11 +It is …through their reasoning. 12 + 13 +Rational agency requires you identify with the principle of choice that causes your action. Korsgaard 14 +(Christine, “Taking the Law into Our Own Hands: Kant on the Right to Revolution,” in The Constitution of Agency: Essays on Practical Reason and Moral Psychology) OS bracketed for gender 15 +The first step …on which you act. 16 + 17 +Thus, the sufficient negative burden is to prove that the res is impossible here are a shit ton of reasons why. 18 + 19 +1. A...impossible. 20 +2. Government...achieved. 21 +3. To ...etc. 22 +4. There’s...principle. 23 +5. Countries...policy. 24 +6. It’s...idea. 25 +7. We...reasoning. 26 +8. The universe is limitless and infinitely expanding, probably means that any limit is impossible and a useless exercise of moral reasoning. Dictionary.com 2016: 27 +9. Law’s...inconsistent. 28 +10. We...nullified. 29 +11. There...inconsistent 30 +12. They...nullified. - EntryDate
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +2016-11-19 05:52:23.0 - Judge
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +NA - Opponent
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +NA - ParentRound
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +6 - Round
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +Quads - Team
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +Oakwood Weiner Neg - Title
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +U of A NC ND 2016 - Tournament
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +Minneapple NA
- Caselist.CitesClass[14]
-
- Cites
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,60 @@ 1 +===1NC: Crime DA === 2 + 3 + 4 +====Crime is low now.==== 5 +**Cooke 15** Charles C. "Careful with the Panic: Violent Crime and Gun Crime Are Both Dropping" National Review November 30^^th^^ 2015 http://www.nationalreview.com/corner/427758/careful-panic-violent-crime-and-gun-crime-are-both-dropping-charles-c-w-cooke JW 6 +Since Friday’s shooting in Colorado Springs, I have spoken to a number of people 7 +AND 8 +getting better. Let’s be circumspect about tinkering and prodding at our success. 9 + 10 + 11 +====Without qualified immunity, police will be unable to effectively enforce law.==== 12 +**King 16** Andrew (assistant prosecuting attorney) "KEEP QUALIFIED IMMUNITY…FOR NOW" July 1^^st^^ 2016 Mimesis Law http://mimesislaw.com/fault-20lines/keep-qualified-immunity-for-now/11010 JW 13 +If you want to see active policing plummet, tell law enforcement officers they will 14 +AND 15 +. Let’s figure out a better one before tearing down the old one. 16 + 17 + 18 +====Qualified immunity is key to deterring crime—multiple warrants.==== 19 +**Rosen 5** Michael (attorney in San Diego at Fish and Richardson PC, an intellectual property law fIrm. In 2003-2004 he served as a law clerk to The Honorable Marilyn L. Huff, Chief Judge of the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of California. He graduated from Harvard Law School in 2003) "A Qualified Defense: In Support of the Doctrine of Qualified Immunity in Excessive Force Cases, With Some Suggestions for its Improvement" Golden Gate University Law Review Volume 35 Issue 2 Article 2 January 2005 http://digitalcommons.law.ggu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1899andcontext=ggulrev JW 20 +It is hard to deny that the more time police officers spend at trial defending 21 +AND 22 +immunity can play in reducing unnecessary costs and in improving deterrence of crime. 23 + 24 + 25 +====Active policing reduces crime.==== 26 +**NIJ 16** National Institute of Justice "Five Things About Deterrence" May 2016 http://nij.gov/five-things/pages/deterrence.aspx JW 27 +Does punishment prevent crime? If so, how, and to what extent? 28 +AND 29 +capital punishment increases, decreases, or has no effect on homicide rates." 30 + 31 + 32 +====Low crime is key to soft power.==== 33 +**Falk 12** Richard (United Nations Special Rapporteur on Palestinian human rights) "When soft power is hard" Al Jazeera July 28^^th^^ 2012 http://www.aljazeera.com/indepth/opinion/2012/07/201272212435524825.html 34 +This unabashed avowal of imperial goals is the main thesis of the article, perhaps 35 +AND 36 +appear that the adage, "disease unknown, cure unknown", applies. 37 + 38 + 39 +====Soft power is high now.==== 40 +**Nye 15** Joseph (Distinguished Service Professor, Harvard Kennedy School of Government; Author, Is the American Century Over?) "Charting the Next American Century" March 4^^th^^ 2015 Council on Foreign Relations http://www.cfr.org/united-states/charting-next-american-century/p36194~~#ER JW 41 +NYE: This is what I think is crucial, which is the United States 42 +AND 43 +or entity, that has as much soft power as the United States. 44 + 45 + 46 +====Soft power solves multiple existential threats.==== 47 +**Lagon 11** Mark P. (International Relations and Security Chair at Georgetown University's Master of Science in Foreign Service Program and adjunct senior fellow at the Council on Foreign Relations. He is the former US Ambassador-at-Large to Combat Trafficking in Persons at the US Department of State) "The Value of Values: Soft Power Under Obama" World Affairs Journal Sept/Oct 2011 http://www.worldaffairsjournal.org/article/value-values-soft-power-under-obama~~#ER 48 +Despite large economic challenges, two protracted military expeditions, and the rise of China 49 +AND 50 +and soft power better than the United States, something is seriously amiss. 51 + 52 + 53 +===Impact – CJS Reform=== 54 + 55 + 56 +====Crime increases prevent imminent CJS reform.==== 57 +**American Interest 15** The American Interest "Violent Crime Wave Could Swamp Prison Reform" American Interest September 2^^nd^^ 2015 http://www.the-american-interest.com/2015/09/02/violent-crime-wave-could-swamp-prison-reform/ 58 +We aren’t criminologists at Via Meadia, so we won’t wade into the fierce debate 59 +AND 60 +boom may be. Posted: Sep 2, 2015 9:11 AM - EntryDate
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +2016-12-01 20:13:35.0 - Judge
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +NA - Opponent
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +NA - ParentRound
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +7 - Round
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +Quads - Team
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +Oakwood Weiner Neg - Title
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +Crime DA ND 2016 - Tournament
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +Glenbrooks
- Caselist.CitesClass[15]
-
- Cites
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,65 @@ 1 +==Pt 1: Framework == 2 + 3 + 4 +====1^^st^^ Humans construct all meaning and value. Two warrants:==== 5 + 6 + 7 +====A) There are no overarching moral doctrines to guide morality – only those we impose in the state of nature. PARRISH 04:==== 8 +1. Rick Parrish 2. 2004 3. The Johns Hopkins University Press 4. Derrida's Economy of Violence in Hobbes' Social Contract 5. 1/5/16 6. Pg 4-7. 7. Rick Parrish teaches at Loyola University New Orleans. His current research is focused on the play of violence and respect within justice. He can be reached at parrish@loyno.edu http://muse.jhu.edu/login?auth=0andtype=summaryandurl=/journals/theory'and'event/v007/7.4parrish.html 9 +Perhaps the single most telling quote from Hobbes on this point comes from The Philosophical 10 +AND 11 +things by humans in acts of creation rather than discovered as extrinsic facts." 12 + 13 + 14 +====B) It is impossible to compare between normative claims since those claims start from functionally different claims, making it impossible to rationally debate between frameworks.^^^^JOYCE:==== 15 +Joyce, Richard. Myth of Morality. Port Chester, NY, USA: Cambridge University Press, 2002. p 45-47. 16 +This distinction between what is accepted from within an institution, and "stepping out 17 +AND 18 +count as evidence that would sway the debate one way or the other. 19 + 20 + 21 +====This precludes any derivation of an argument since those arguments are functionally impossible to compare themselves, making debate impossible.==== 22 + 23 + 24 +====The conclusion is adherence to the sovereign: since the sovereign's role is to provide a common meaning to notions like morality, the question of morality is the SAME question as the nature of the sovereign. PARRISH 2: ==== 25 +1. Rick Parrish 2. 2004 3. The Johns Hopkins University Press 4. Derrida's Economy of Violence in Hobbes' Social Contract 5. 1/5/16 6. Pg 4-7. 7. Rick Parrish teaches at Loyola University New Orleans. His current research is focused on the play of violence and respect within justice. He can be reached at parrish@loyno.edu http://muse.jhu.edu/login?auth=0andtype=summaryandurl=/journals/theory'and'event/v007/7.4parrish.html 26 +All of the foregoing points to the conclusion that in the commonwealth the sovereign's first 27 +AND 28 +directions"60 and fall inevitably into the violence of the natural condition." 29 + 30 + 31 +====If there is no sovereign, we can’t understand any relevant assertions of language, so all assertions would be true that’s Parrish 1 – other things being false. This is because the truth-value of a definition is ultimately arbitrary. We may be able to bicker over technicalities, but the only real way to determine what a word means is an appeal to authority. Unless there is an ultimate authority in the form of a sovereign that can express its will, there is only interpretive chaos. This also means that the contextualization of the aff as limit is without a brightline since there is no logical cutoff point for which we can stop caring about qualified immunity. And if there is no sovereign, then we can’t understand who is right with competing claims. Which means the NC fw is a side constraint to the aff. ==== 32 + 33 + 34 +====And, individuals don’t have rights against the state meaning that they cannot hold police as state actors accountable, so even if we do the aff it is useless because indaviduals ought not open civil suit against the police. FEINBURG 70:==== 35 +Première publication dans The journal of Value Inquiry, Vol.4 (1970), pp.243-57; repris dans Joel Feinberg, Rights, justice, and the bounds of Liberty, Priceton University Press, Priceton, 1980, pp.159-184. La version originale de cet article contient des italiques omis par cette version numérique. 36 +Feinberg, Joel (a political and social philosopher who did groundbreaking work in the fields of individual rights and the authority of the state), and Jan Narveson. "The nature and value of rights." The Journal of Value Inquiry 4.4 (1970): pg 247. URL: http://link.springer.com/article/10.10072FBF00137935 Date Accessed: Feb 13 2016 37 +Surely, one might ask, rights have to come in somewhere, if we 38 +AND 39 +in the words of David: "To Thee only have I sinned." 40 + 41 + 42 +====States define moral force, so, conditions that restrict sovereign choice are bad by definition since whenever they would come up they would be defined as wrong. But that’s just what rights are, so my framework means we can’t have rights.==== 43 + 44 + 45 +====Thus the standard is consistency with the power of the sovereign==== 46 + 47 + 48 +==Contentions== 49 + 50 + 51 +====1. Qualified immunity allows police to carry out there duty to the state and gives them power without being accountable. Schott 12: ==== 52 +Qualified Immunity: How it Protects Law Enforcement Officers By Richard G. Schott J.D. September 2012 https://leb.fbi.gov/2012/september/qualified-immunity-how-it-protects-law-enforcement-officers 53 +Law enforcement personnel expose themselves to risks every day. Those risks include the possibility 54 +AND 55 +the Air Force in violation of his First Amendment and other statutory rights. 56 + 57 + 58 +====2. This means that qualified immunity is integral in police performing duty towards the state without being held accountable which means better control over citizenry, we need to limit legislative power of the people, the state needs an unconditional monopolization on force **Fichte 2:====** 59 +J.G. Fichte, "Foundations of Natural Right: According to the Principles of the Wissenschaftslehre". Edited by Frederick Neuhouser, Cornell University. Translated by Michael Baur, Fordham University. Cambridge University Press, 2000. 60 +This common will must be equipped with a power — and indeed a superior power 61 +AND 62 +to keep~~; and therefore there exists the most perfect equilibrium of right. 63 + 64 + 65 +====3. Violations of soverign power necessarily come 1^^st^^ because only those can affect how we act in ethical situations meaning its only possible to give credence to police over citizenry. ==== - EntryDate
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +2016-12-01 20:17:02.0 - Judge
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +NA - Opponent
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +NA - ParentRound
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +8 - Round
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +Quads - Team
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +Oakwood Weiner Neg - Title
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +Hobbes NC ND 2016 - Tournament
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +Minneapple
- Caselist.CitesClass[16]
-
- Cites
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,18 @@ 1 +All my broken positions are on my wiki, also anything on Jack Warehams wiki is fair game. IF I AM BREAKING NEW I WILL TELL YOU, IF YOU INQUIRE. Also I only disclose past NR's or the 1NC strat if you disclose; Tell me; 2 + 3 +1. ROTB text (if ur reading one) 4 +2. EXACT PLAN TEXT (if ur reading a plan) 5 +3. Framework specifics/standard text 6 +4. Advantages 7 + 8 +If I'm affirming i against you tell me; 9 + 10 +1. ROTB text (if ur reading one) 11 +2. Exact CP and K alt texts 12 +3. Framework specifics/standard text of the NC or the K 13 +4. DA's (coal, drought, warming etc) 14 +5. FULL T INTERP TEXTS! (if you have bidirectional ones, tell me before the round what version of the aff is topical/ the one you want me to defend, Whole res, or plan? and i may take it into account to avoid a T debate also goes for spec shells) 15 +so yeah 16 + 17 +So yeah I LOVE READING DISCLOSURE THEORY! 18 +Interpretation: debaters must disclose all broken positions (including ACs, NCs, DAs, CPs and Ks) on the NDCA LD 2016-2017 wiki under their own name or another debaters WITH NOTIFICATION THAT UR READING FROM THEIR WIKI, school, and correct side with cites, tags, the first three and the last three words of all cards read at least an hour before the round begins. - EntryDate
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +2016-12-02 21:11:58.0 - Judge
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +NA - Opponent
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +NA - ParentRound
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +9 - Round
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +Quads - Team
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +Oakwood Weiner Neg - Title
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +IMPORTANT NOTE FOR ALTA - Tournament
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +Alta
- Caselist.CitesClass[18]
-
- Cites
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,68 @@ 1 +====A. Interpretation: The aff must specify a comprehensive role of the ballot and clarify how the round will play out under that role of the ballot in the form of a text in the 1AC. To clarify, the aff must: ==== 2 + 3 + 4 +====1. Clarify how we determine what a legitimate advocacy is and how offense links back to the role of the ballot, such as whether topicality constrains the aff advocacy or not. ==== 5 + 6 + 7 +====2. Every plank of the ROB must be warranted, just like the standard text for a normative ethical theory, and what area of debate must be warranted i.e. which assumptions we should accept and which we shouldn’t. ==== 8 + 9 + 10 +====3. Clarify what theoretical objections do and do not link to the aff, and whether or not the aff comes before theory. ==== 11 + 12 + 13 +====4. Describe how to weigh and compare between competing advocacies i.e. whether the role of the ballot is solely determined by the flow or another method of engagement. ==== 14 + 15 + 16 +====B. Violation:==== 17 + 18 + 19 +====C. Standards:==== 20 + 21 + 22 +====1. Engagement – If I...offense. Few impacts:==== 23 + 24 + 25 +====a) Education – when two ships pass in the night we don’t learn anything, education is derived from analyzing and comparing each other’s arguments, so this theory argument is specifically legitimate. Not being able to crystallize on one issue is the definition of bad education. CHOKSHI:==== 26 +Niraj Chokshi is a former staff editor at TheAtlantic.com, where he wrote about technology. He is currently freelancing How Do We Stop the Internet From Making Us Stupid? JUN 8 2010 http://www.theatlantic.com/technology/archive/2010/06/how-do-we-stop-the-internet-from-making-us-stupid/57796/ 27 +When it comes to focus, turning on the spotlight may not matter as much 28 +AND 29 +superficial thinking, how do we fight back? Carr offers some advice: 30 + 31 + 32 +====b) Resolvability – if there...a gateway issue. ==== 33 + 34 + 35 +====c) Link turns your... position can create. ==== 36 + 37 + 38 +====d) Having clearly defined parameters and guidelines on the role of the ballot debate is a prerequisite to debate itself. SHIVELY:==== 39 +Shively, Michael ~~Prof Politics at Texas AandM~~. "Partisan Politics and Political Theory" (p.181-2) 40 +The ambiguists must say "no" to—they must reject and limit— 41 +AND 42 +. In other words, contestation rests on some basic agreement or harmony. 43 + 44 + 45 +====All rules aren’t the same – agreement on the meanings of terms is not only necessary for debate but enables resistance. SHIVELY 2:==== 46 +Shively, Michael ~~Prof Politics at Texas AandM~~. "Partisan Politics and Political Theory" (p.181-2) 47 +The point may seem trite, as surely the ambiguists would agree that basic terms 48 +AND 49 +good arguments. Such agreements are simply implicit in the act of argumentation. 50 + 51 + 52 +====2. Strategy Skew – You...in your position.==== 53 + 54 + 55 +====Further, warranting every...access the ballot. ==== 56 + 57 + 58 +====Narrowing the debate to a specific question is key to effective discussion and decision-making, there’s real-world evidence. STEINBERG and FREELEY:^^ ^^==== 59 +Steinberg and Freeley 8 *Austin J. Freeley is a Boston based attorney who focuses on criminal, personal injury and civil rights law, AND **David L. Steinberg, Lecturer of Communication Studies @ U Miami, Argumentation and Debate: Critical Thinking for Reasoned Decision Making pp45- 60 +Debate is a means of settling differences, so there must be a difference of 61 +AND 62 +a particular point of difference, which will be outlined in the following discussion 63 + 64 + 65 +====Framing: You can’t...in the AC.==== 66 + 67 + 68 +====D. Voter:==== - EntryDate
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +2016-12-03 14:44:56.0 - Judge
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +NA - Opponent
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +NA - ParentRound
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +11 - Round
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +Triples - Team
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +Oakwood Weiner Neg - Title
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +ROB SPEC - Tournament
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +Alta
- Caselist.CitesClass[19]
-
- Cites
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,19 @@ 1 +====Creating the role of the judge as an educator that needs to enforce certain social norms forces the judge into the coercive role that makes any attempts at meaningful education pointless and actually reintrenches an authoritarian logic of violence==== 2 +Thomas Rickert, "Hands Up, You’re Free": Composition in a Post-Oedipal World, 2001 // 3 +An example of the connection between violence and pedagogy is implicit in the notion of 4 +AND 5 +also opens up a cynical distance toward the writing pro duced in class. 6 + 7 + 8 +====Outweighs: a) any substantive This turns case.==== 9 +Thomas Rickert, "Hands Up, You’re Free": Composition in a Post-Oedipal World, 2001 // 10 +This essay will employ Deleuze's and Zizek's theories to illustrate the limitations of writing pedagogies 11 +AND 12 +observes, "nothing is more aggressive than the desire to serve the other 13 + 14 + 15 +====Outweighs: a) even if critical b) even if it...pedagogy from its warrants.==== 16 + 17 +Drop the Debater 18 +A. The abuse has...Discourse damage is irreversible. 19 +B. Drop the debate...future oppressive practices - EntryDate
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +2016-12-03 15:52:19.0 - Judge
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +Liz Letak - Opponent
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +Lynbrook NA - ParentRound
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +12 - Round
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +4 - Team
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +Oakwood Weiner Neg - Title
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +Rickert K ND 16 - Tournament
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +Alta
- Caselist.CitesClass[20]
-
- Cites
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,19 @@ 1 +====Current protections against hate speech are working – on campus harrassment is decreasing nationally now. Sutton 16 ==== 2 +**Sutton 16** Halley Sutton, Report shows crime on campus down across the country, Campus Security Report 13.4 (2016), 9/9/16,http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/casr.30185/full //LADI 3 +A recent report released by the National Center for Education Statistics found an overall decrease 4 +AND 5 +lower than in 2001 for every category except forcible sex offenses and murder. 6 + 7 + 8 +====Removing restrictions on free speech allows hate speech – hate speech IS free speech==== 9 +**Volokh 15** Eugene Volokh,No, There’s No "hate Speech" Exception to the First Amendment, The Washington Post, 5/7/15, https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/volokh-conspiracy/wp/2015/05/07/no-theres-no-hate-speech-exception-to-the-first-amendment/?utm'term=.05cfdd01dea4 //LADI 10 +I keep hearing about a supposed "hate speech" exception to the First Amendment 11 +AND 12 +with any established definition of "hate speech" that I know of.) 13 + 14 + 15 +====Hate speech leads to a genocidal increase in crimes against marginalized groups and an increase in structural violence. ==== 16 +**Greenblatt 15** Jonathan Greenblatt, When Hateful Speech Leads to Hate Crimes: Taking Bigotry Out of the Immigration Debate, Huffington Post, 8/21/15, http://www.huffingtonpost.com/jonathan-greenblatt/when-hateful-speech-leads'b'8022966.html //LADI 17 +When police arrived at the scene in Boston, they found a Latino man shaking 18 +AND 19 +are working with a broad coalition of partners to get the ball rolling. - EntryDate
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +2016-12-16 22:00:26.0 - Judge
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +Josh You - Opponent
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +Lakeville South EH - ParentRound
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +13 - Round
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +3 - Team
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +Oakwood Weiner Neg - Title
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +JF17 Hate Speech DA - Tournament
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +Blake 2016
- Caselist.CitesClass[21]
-
- Cites
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,37 @@ 1 +Justifying moral claims require adherence to the rules of the activity. A. Practice rules determine obligations—baseball players ought to hit home runs, but this doesn’t apply to someone playing chess. The activity we’re engaged in provides contextual background in deciding the normativity of our actions. B. Solves infinite regress—answering the question of why an agent ought to take an action is impossible because one can keep asking “why” to infinity—the only legitimate answer to a question about your chess move is that you’re playing chess. 2 + 3 +Practical reflection is an inescapable aspect of agency. 4 +Ferrero Luca Ferrero (University of Wisconsin at Milwaukee) “Constitutivism and the Inescapability of Agency” Oxford Studies in Metaethics, vol. IV January 12th 2009 pp. 6-8 JW 5 +3.2 Agency is special under two respects. First, agency is the 6 +AND 7 +agencyʼs own distinctive operation: Agency is closed under itself.15 8 + 9 +Impacts: A. Aff framework devolves to the NC—to even reflect about the legitimacy of your standard concedes the authority of agency since it’s in every action. B. The constitutive properties of action cannot be aggregated. Adding two circles together doesn’t make anything more circular because their circularity isn’t an additive consequence but something inherent to their form. 10 + 11 +Next, rational reflection requires that the maxims we act upon be universalizable. Any reasoner would know that two plus two equals four because there is no a priori distinction between agents so norms must be universally valid. And- willing coercion is a contradiction in conception because you extend your own freedom while simultaneously undermining your ability to act in the first place. In order to prevent coercion individuals must submit to the omnilateral will. 12 +Kant Immanuel Kant (leading Kantian scholar) The Metaphysical Elements of Justice, trans. John Ladd. 1797. Indianapolis: Hackett Publsihing, 1999. 13 +When I declare (by word or deed), “I will that an external 14 +AND 15 +a thing can be externally yours or mine only in a civil society. 16 + 17 +Thus, the standard is consistency with the omnilateral will. Prefer the standard: all frameworks presuppose liberty. People can only be held responsible for unethical actions if they chose to do them, but choice itself requires that people can pick which actions to take without threat of force. For example, if someone holds a gun to my head and makes me steal someone’s apple, I am not truly culpable because I wasn’t free. 18 + 19 +Impact analysis: only freedom violations intrinsic to the structure of the action are relevant. A. Consequentialism is incoherent. 1. Every consequence causes another consequence in a chain of infinite events. That means either every action would have infinite value or there’s no way to weigh. 2. Consequentialism requires a heuristic to determine the probability of consequences occurring, but that means we must also calculate the probability of this heuristic to determine probability, and so on to infinity. B. We can’t be culpable for consequences—external forces determine them. 20 +Hegel 20 George Wilhelm Friedrich Hegel The Philosophy of Right 1820 21 +The will has before it an outer reality, upon which it operates. But 22 +AND 23 +adopt only the first consequences, since they alone lie in the purpose. 24 + 25 +I contend that public entities have an obligation to restrict some constitutionally protected free speech. 26 + 27 +First, speech acts that intend to incite revolution dissolve the authority of the sovereign and must be prohibited. 28 +Varden 10 Helga Varden (Associate Professor of Philosophy at the University of Illinois) “A Kantian Conception of Free Speech” May 22nd 2010 Freedom of Expression in a Diverse World Volume 3 of the series AMINTAPHIL: The Philosophical Foundations of Law and Justice pp 39-55 http://link.springer.com/chapter/10.10072F978-90-481-8999-1_4 JW 29 +To understand Kant’s condemnation of seditious speech, remember that Kant, as mentioned above 30 +AND 31 +qua private citizens, it is a public crime (6: 331). 32 + 33 +Second, hate speech relies on historical oppression, which obligates the state to intervene. 34 +Varden 10 Helga Varden (Associate Professor of Philosophy at the University of Illinois) “A Kantian Conception of Free Speech” May 22nd 2010 Freedom of Expression in a Diverse World Volume 3 of the series AMINTAPHIL: The Philosophical Foundations of Law and Justice pp 39-55 http://link.springer.com/chapter/10.10072F978-90-481-8999-1_4 JW 35 +Kant’s distinction between public and private right can also be used to make sense of 36 +AND 37 +public debate and reflection followed by public regulation on behalf of all citizens. - EntryDate
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +2017-01-28 23:45:38.0 - Judge
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +Jacob Nails - Opponent
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +Harrison MZ - ParentRound
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +14 - Round
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +6 - Team
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +Oakwood Weiner Neg - Title
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +JF17 Kant NC - Tournament
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +Emory
- Caselist.CitesClass[22]
-
- Cites
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,25 @@ 1 +Trigger warnings restrict freedom of speech 2 +FIRE ’16 EXPLAINS: Foundation for Individual Rights in Education (Free speech watchdog), 2016, https://www.thefire.org/u-chicagos-academic-freedom-letter-a-win-for-campus-speech/ 3 +“Our commitment to academic freedom means that we do not support so-called 4 +AND 5 +where individuals can retreat from ideas and perspectives at odds with their own.” 6 +Trigger warnings protect survivors of abuse and minorities from trauma and unsafe enviroments 7 +Pickett ’16 RaeAnn Pickett is senior director of communications and public Affairs at the National Latina Institute for Reproductive Health and a Ms. Foundation Public Voices Fellows; Aug. 31, 2016; Time Magazine; “Trigger Warnings and Safe Spaces Are Necessary”; http://time.com/4471806/trigger-warnings-safe-spaces/ 8 +The University of Chicago recently decided to put an end to trigger warnings—advance 9 +AND 10 +or survivors of trauma or those who live at the intersection of both. 11 +Trigger warnings avoid delegitimizing experiences of racial minorities, women, and those with mental health issues 12 +Holmes ’16 Deputy Healthy Living Editor, The Huffington Post; 08/26/2016; “A Quick Lesson On What Trigger Warnings Actually Do”; http://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/university-of-chicago-trigger-warning_us_57bf16d9e4b085c1ff28176d 13 +Trigger warnings and safe spaces aren’t a way to avoiding disagreement or 14 +AND 15 +of work requires a controlled and private environment outlined by the practicing clinician. 16 +Trigger warnings help us confront experiences that don’t conform to the norm 17 +Gust ’16 Dr Onni Gust: Lecturer in colonial and postcolonial history at the University of Nottingham; 14 June 2016; “I use trigger warnings - but I'm not mollycoddling my students”; https://www.theguardian.com/higher-education-network/2016/jun/14/i-use-trigger-warnings-but-im-not-mollycoddling-my-students 18 +A trigger warning (or content note) alerts readers or viewers to violent and 19 +AND 20 +, challenging and that learning is, and should be, for everyone. 21 +Trigger warnings acknowledge the presence of structural violence and deal with it; Also, PTSD exposure therapy is not proven to work 22 +Brownstone ’16 Sydney Brownstone is a Seattle-based staff writer; Aug 31, 2016; “Here Are 6 Reasons Why Trigger Warnings Aren't Bullshit”; http://www.thestranger.com/slog/2016/08/31/24529597/here-are-6-reasons-why-trigger-warnings-arent-bullshit 23 +One of the experts Dan cites says that many rape victims get over their symptoms 24 +AND 25 +be attempts to invalidate or ignore the people who need them the most. - EntryDate
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +2017-02-12 23:52:35.0 - Judge
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +Jonathan Alston - Opponent
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +Riverside JM - ParentRound
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +15 - Round
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +1 - Team
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +Oakwood Weiner Neg - Title
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +JF17 Trigger Warning DA - Tournament
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +Emory
- Caselist.CitesClass[23]
-
- Cites
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,23 @@ 1 +A. Interpretation: debaters may not specify a specific kind of free speech that they protect or a specific free speech restriction that they remove. They must defend that all and any free speech protected constitutionally. 2 + 3 +B. Violation: They only defend removing free speech that “criticizes the State of Israel.” 4 + 5 +C. Standards: Textuality 6 + 7 +1. “Any” means no matter what kind or quality. 8 +Collins English Dictionary 14 Collins English Dictionary Complete and Unabridged, “any” 12th Edition 2014 http://www.thefreedictionary.com/any JW 9 +one, some, or several, as specified, no matter how much or many, what kind or quality, etc: any cheese in the cupboard is yours; you may take any clothes you like. 10 + 11 +2. That means the aff can only affirm by proving that all free speech, regardless of its specific qualities, must be protected. Prefer my definition of “any,” it’s most contextual and constitutive to the resolution. 12 +Debois 17 Danny (champion of TOC, NCFL Grand Nationals, the Minneapple, The Glenbrooks, and the Harvard Invitational (twice), coaches Harvard-Westlake) “Topic Analysis by Danny Debois” January-February 2017 LD Brief JW 13 +Two major competing definitions of any generally involve in meaning one of two things. 14 +AND 15 +restriction you look at, the aff thinks any of them are bad. 16 + 17 +3. Vote neg they don’t defend the topic means we presume that they don’t have a legitimate advocacy in terms of the resolution, I’m the only one left with an advocacy. It’s not a matter of fairness or education it’s a matter of being able to affirm textually. 18 + 19 +4. The topicality rule comes first textually, and if fairness and education do matter being textually and wholly topical is the best link. 20 +Nebel 15 Jake “The Priority of Resolutional Semantics” vbriefly February 20th 2015 http://vbriefly.com/2015/02/20/the-priority-of-resolutional-semantics-by-jake-nebel/ JW 21 +1.1 The Topicality Rule vs. Pragmatic Considerations There is an obvious objection 22 +AND 23 +there is a principled response to such strategies, as I discuss below. - EntryDate
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +2017-02-12 23:58:27.0 - Judge
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +Braden James - Opponent
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +West Ranch JW - ParentRound
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +16 - Round
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +1 - Team
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +Oakwood Weiner Neg - Title
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +1- JF17 T Any - Tournament
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +Stanford 2017
- Caselist.CitesClass[24]
-
- Cites
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,45 @@ 1 +1st: Link 2 + 3 +Campus press, newspapers, and political movements have cultivated an anti-Semitic attitude not because of anti Zionist sentiment but by publishing anti-Zionist stereotype-relying articles. The aff relies on social movements spread through these modes of “Socially progressive discourse” that are inherently anti-Semitic. 4 +Cravatts 16, Richard. "Not All the News That's Fit to Print." Frontpage Mag. N.p., 07 Dec. 2016. Web. 06 Jan. 2017. (CWLC) 5 +When Elmer Davis, director of FDR’s Office of War Information, observed that “. 6 +AND 7 +misrepresent the recent history of the Black Lives Matter movement, at all. 8 + 9 +2nd the Emmons 16 card implicitly says that Anti Zionism and anti Semitism are not the same thing but they fail to acknowledge the religious and historical tie between the two in terms of socially progressive movements it’s nieve of the aff to think that we do one without the other. 10 + 11 +2nd: Impact 12 + 13 +Jews have been indoctrinated into American culture and homogenized beyond repair: Immigration is the problem. Destruction of the Jewish state entails destruction of the Jewish identity and discourse around the subject not being protected is a massive issue. Charmé 2000: 14 +Varieties of Authenticity in Contemporary Jewish Identity Stuart Z. Charmé Jewish Social Studies, Volume 6, Number 2, Winter 2000 (New Series). Pp. 133-155 (Article) Puclished By Indiana University Press Oakwood AW Don’t try and steal this shit 15 +Certainly, the dichotomy between the spontaneous and natural au- thenticity of the folk 16 +AND 17 +possessed its own language, its own Social manners, styles, values.” 18 + 19 +Anti-Semitism manifests itself in socially progressive movements like pro Palestinian ones, which excludes Jewish individuals from dialogue. The aff hides behind the guise of oppression solving but doesn’t understand the history of the issue. 20 +Berteaux 16 "In the Safe Spaces on Campus, No Jews Allowed." The Tower. N.p., Feb. 2016. Web. 18 Dec. 2016. http://www.thetower.org/article/in-the-safe-spaces-on-campus-no-jews-allowed/ (CWLC) 21 +excluding Jews from the progressive movement for racial justice is not isolated to the Students 22 +AND 23 +a progressive organization, claiming solidarity with movements such as Black Lives Matter. 24 + 25 +3rd: Framing 26 + 27 +A. Normal emancipatory ideology or politics like the aff entail destruction of the Jewish identity and necessarily cannot apply to jews, things cannot get better for us post holocaust: Jews need political apostasy through the state of Israel because of our inability to take on positive change: Means that we cannot have productive discourse about a two state solution: Bradley ’99: 28 +Reviewed Work(s): Jews Against Prejudice: American Jews and the Fight for Civil Liberties by Stuart Svonkin Review by: Richard Bradley Source: Shofar, Vol. 17, No. 4 (SUMMER 1999), pp. 146-147 Published by: Purdue University Press Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/42942962 Accessed: 26-09-2016 15:37 UTC Cut by Oakwood AW (Don’t try to steal this shit) 29 +The major weakness of Svonkin' s book is his failure to fully consider the reasons 30 +AND 31 +assimilation was seen at this time as entailing the destruction of Jewish identity. 32 + 33 +B. Link turns your ROTB Anti-Semitism’s causes Jewish oppression biggest impact Palestinians and Muslims have every other country in the middle east to profess there religious faith and identity, in most places in the middle east it is illegal to be Jewish. Putting Jews in the role of not being in need of help or emancipation because they are allegedly well off or a model minority is a strategy used by anti Semites. 34 +Gold 96 PUTTING ANTI-SEMITISM ON THE ANTI-RACISM AGENDA IN NORTH AMERICAN SCHOOLS OF SOCIAL WORK Author(s): Nora Gold Source: Journal of Social Work Education, Vol. 32, No. 1 (Winter 1996), pp. 77-89 35 +Anti-Semitism can express itself in a variety of forms. The first, 36 +AND 37 +as specific demographic characteristics of the Jewish poor which have contributed to their invisibility 38 + 39 +4th: Alternative 40 + 41 +TEXT: Public colleges and universities in the United States ought not restrict constitutionally protected journalist speech but ought to restrict anti-Semitic journalism and discourse. 42 +ADL 16 "The Anti-Semitism Awareness Act of 2016." ADL. N.p., n.d. Web. 16 Dec. 2016. No date no specific author (CWLC) 43 +Anti-Semitism is disturbingly pervasive and moving into the mainstream. In recent years 44 +AND 45 +informed by a definition of anti-Semitism that includes all current manifestations. - EntryDate
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +2017-02-12 23:58:28.0 - Judge
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +Braden James - Opponent
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +West Ranch JW - ParentRound
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +16 - Round
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +1 - Team
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +Oakwood Weiner Neg - Title
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +JF17 Jewish Ontology K - Tournament
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +Stanford 2017
- Caselist.RoundClass[6]
-
- Cites
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +13 - EntryDate
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +2016-11-19 05:52:21.0 - Judge
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +NA - Opponent
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +NA - Round
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +Quads - Tournament
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +Minneapple NA
- Caselist.RoundClass[7]
-
- Cites
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +14 - EntryDate
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +2016-12-01 20:13:31.0 - Judge
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +NA - Opponent
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +NA - Round
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +Quads - Tournament
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +Glenbrooks
- Caselist.RoundClass[8]
-
- Cites
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +15 - EntryDate
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +2016-12-01 20:16:59.0 - Judge
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +NA - Opponent
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +NA - Round
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +Quads - Tournament
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +Minneapple
- Caselist.RoundClass[9]
-
- Cites
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +16 - EntryDate
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +2016-12-02 21:11:56.0 - Judge
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +NA - Opponent
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +NA - Round
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +Quads - Tournament
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +Alta
- Caselist.RoundClass[11]
-
- Cites
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +18 - EntryDate
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +2016-12-03 14:44:54.0 - Judge
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +NA - Opponent
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +NA - Round
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +Triples - Tournament
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +Alta
- Caselist.RoundClass[12]
-
- Cites
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +19 - EntryDate
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +2016-12-03 15:52:17.0 - Judge
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +Liz Letak - Opponent
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +Lynbrook NA - Round
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +4 - Tournament
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +Alta
- Caselist.RoundClass[13]
-
- Cites
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +20 - EntryDate
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +2016-12-16 22:00:24.0 - Judge
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +Josh You - Opponent
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +Lakeville South EH - Round
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +3 - Tournament
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +Blake 2016
- Caselist.RoundClass[14]
-
- Cites
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +21 - EntryDate
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +2017-01-28 23:45:36.0 - Judge
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +Jacob Nails - Opponent
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +Harrison MZ - Round
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +6 - Tournament
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +Emory
- Caselist.RoundClass[15]
-
- Cites
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +22 - EntryDate
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +2017-02-12 23:52:33.0 - Judge
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +Jonathan Alston - Opponent
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +Riverside JM - Round
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +1 - Tournament
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +Emory
- Caselist.RoundClass[16]
-
- Cites
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +23,24 - EntryDate
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +2017-02-12 23:58:20.0 - Judge
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +Braden James - Opponent
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +West Ranch JW - Round
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +1 - Tournament
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +Stanford 2017