Changes for page Oakwood Weiner Aff
Summary
-
Objects (0 modified, 1 added, 10 removed)
Details
- Caselist.CitesClass[10]
-
- Cites
-
... ... @@ -1,11 +1,0 @@ 1 -All my broken positions are on my wiki, also HEADS UP anything on Jack Warehams wiki is fair game. IF I AM BREAKING NEW I WILL TELL YOU, IF YOU INQUIRE. Also tell me what the 1NC ur reading is: Tell me... 2 - 3 -1. ROTB text (if ur reading one) 4 -2. Exact CP and K alt texts 5 -3. Framework specifics/standard text of the NC or the K 6 -4. DA's (coal, drought, warming etc) 7 -5. FULL T INTERP TEXTS! (if you have bidirectional ones, tell me before the round what version of the aff is topical/ the one you want me to defend, Whole res, or plan? and i may take it into account to avoid a T debate) 8 - 9 -so yeah 10 -I LOVE READING DISCLOSURE THEORY! 11 -Interpretation: debaters must disclose all broken positions (including ACs, NCs, DAs, CPs and Ks) on the NDCA LD 2016-2017 wiki under their own name or another debaters WITH NOTIFICATION THAT UR READING FROM THEIR WIKI, school, and correct side with cites, tags, the first three and the last three words of all cards read at least an hour before the round begins. - EntryDate
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -2016-10-13 07:58:40.0 - Judge
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -NA - Opponent
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -NA - ParentRound
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -8 - Round
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -Finals - Team
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -Oakwood Weiner Aff - Title
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -IMPORTANT NOTE FOR BRONX - Tournament
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -Bronx
- Caselist.CitesClass[11]
-
- Cites
-
... ... @@ -1,10 +1,0 @@ 1 -Its the first tournament of the topic so coming up to me in prelims and asking me what I'm reading is very annoying and you probably won't get an answer and you need to chill and be fine with that. I will be breaking new almost every round and if I do read something it will go up on the wiki. Thats it. 2 - 3 -ROTB text (if ur reading one) 4 -2. Exact CP and K alt texts 5 -3. Framework specifics/standard text of the NC or the K 6 -4. DA's (coal, drought, warming etc) 7 -5. FULL T INTERP TEXTS! (if you have bidirectional ones, tell me before the round what version of the aff is topical/ the one you want me to defend, Whole res, or plan? and i may take it into account to avoid a T debate) 8 -so yeah 9 -I LOVE READING DISCLOSURE THEORY! 10 -Interpretation: debaters must disclose all broken positions (including ACs, NCs, DAs, CPs and Ks) on the NDCA LD 2016-2017 wiki under their own name or another debaters WITH NOTIFICATION THAT UR READING FROM THEIR WIKI, school, and correct side with cites, tags, the first three and the last three words of all cards read at least an hour before the round begins. - EntryDate
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -2016-11-01 21:30:40.0 - Judge
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -NA - Opponent
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -NA - ParentRound
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -9 - Round
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -Quads - Team
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -Oakwood Weiner Aff - Title
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -IMPORTANT NOTE FOR MINNEAPPLE - Tournament
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -Minneapple
- Caselist.CitesClass[12]
-
- Cites
-
... ... @@ -1,68 +1,0 @@ 1 -Pt 1: Framework 2 - 3 -ROTB 4 - 5 -The state is inevitable- speaking the language of power through policymaking is the only way to create social change in debate thus the ROTB is to evaluate the topic through competing policy actions. Coverstone 5: 6 -Alan Coverstone (masters in communication from Wake Forest, longtime debate coach) “Acting on Activism: Realizing the Vision of Debate with Pro-social Impact” Paper presented at the National Communication Association Annual Conference November 17th 2005 JW 11/18/15 7 -An important concern emerges when Mitchell describes reflexive fiat as a contest strategy capable of 8 -AND 9 -that is a fundamental cause of voter and participatory abstention in America today. 10 - 11 -Pt 1: Util 12 - 13 -Phenomenal introspection is reliable and proves that util is objectively valid. Sinhababu: 14 -Sinhababu Neil (National University of Singapore) “The epistemic argument for hedonism” http://philpapers.org/archive/SINTEA-3 accessed 2-4-16 JW 15 -The Odyssey's treatment of these events demonstrates how dramatically ancient Greek moral intuitions differ from 16 -AND 17 -favors the kind of universal hedonism that supports utilitarianism, not egoistic hedonism. 18 - 19 -Thus, the standard is maximizing happiness. Prefer the standard: 20 - 21 -1. Ethical frameworks must be theoretically legitimate. 22 -Fairness is a voter 23 -Education is a voter 24 - 25 -AND: Reductionism: personal identity doesn’t exist. 26 -Olson Eric T. (Professor of Philosophy at the University of Sheffield) “Personal Identity” Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy Aug 20, 2002; substantive revision Oct 28, 2010 http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/identity-personal/#PsyApp JW 27 -Whatever psychological continuity may amount to, a more serious worry for the Psychological Approach 28 -AND 29 -, you are both hungry and not hungry at once: a contradiction. 30 - 31 -This means consequentialism – moral theories can’t focus on individuals since there’s nothing that unifies them across time. Only states of affairs can have value. 32 - 33 -With that noted we also need to look to what’s constitutive of how the US wills so anything within normal US means should be prioritized as policy. 34 - 35 -Pt 2: Advocacy 36 - 37 -Text: The United States ought to limit qualified immunity for police officers. 38 - 39 -Solvency 40 - 41 -The Supreme Court is going to limit qualified immunity by way of the plan and affirmation of the topic. 42 - 43 -Constitutional challenges are inevitable Hill 06: 44 -(Lisa Hill, Senior ARC Fellow in Politics at the University of Adelaide, Low Voter Turnout in the United States: Is Compulsory Voting a Viable Solution?, Journal of Theoretical Politics 2006 18: 207, http://jtp.sagepub.com/content/18/2/207) 45 -Potential constitutional barriers are also an obvious concern. It does seem inevitable that compulsory 46 -AND 47 -may not look so favourably upon legislation of a considerably more controversial nature. 48 - 49 -It will be limited because the very notion of qualified immunity is based on a false legal premise: Reinhardt 15 50 -Stephen (circuit judge on the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit) “The Demise of Habeas Corpus and the Rise of Qualified Immunity: The Court's Ever Increasing Limitations on the Development and Enforcement of Constitutional Rights and Some Particularly Unfortunate Consequences” 113 Mich. L. Rev. 1219 (2015) JW 51 -As in the habeas context, the doctrinal evolution of qualified immunity was not inevitable 52 -AND 53 -has once again exalted a lesser concern over the protection of constitutional rights. 54 - 55 -Rollback 56 - 57 -Overturning law on unconstitutional or unlawful grounds reaffirms the legitimacy of the Supreme Court. 58 -Rosenfeld 04: 59 -(Professor of Constitutional Law, Constitutional Adjudication in Europe and the United States: Paradoxes and Contrast International Journal of Constitutional Law Volume 2, Number 2, October 650-1 TC) 60 -In theory at least, common law adjudication need not involve repudiation of precedents, 61 -AND 62 -constitutional adjudicator seems more delicate and precarious than that of her continental counterpart. 63 - 64 -Enforcing controversial decisions like repealing the qualified immunity act builds legitimacy Law 09: 65 -(David S., Professor of Law and Political Science – Washington University, “A Theory of Judicial Power and Judicial Review”, Georgetown Law Journal, March, 97 Geo. L.J. 723, Lexis) 66 -Part IV of this Article discusses a counterintuitive implication of a coordination-based account 67 -AND 68 -Brown v. Board of Education 27 and Cooper v. Aaron. 28 - EntryDate
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -2016-11-04 22:25:17.0 - Judge
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -NA - Opponent
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -NA - ParentRound
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -11 - Round
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -Quads - Team
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -Oakwood Weiner Aff - Title
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -ND16 Judicial Deference AC - Tournament
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -Minneapple
- Caselist.CitesClass[13]
-
- Cites
-
... ... @@ -1,126 +1,0 @@ 1 -=1AC Glenbrooks Round 1 Oakwood AW= 2 - 3 - 4 -====I affirm ==== 5 - 6 - 7 -====1. I will defend and spec whatever you want in CX but its not relevant to the aff==== 8 - 9 - 10 -====2. I reserve the right to clarify ==== 11 - 12 - 13 -====3. There is an interpretation under which the aff lies so T shells that can always be bidirectional aren’t relevant and even if they are, just reevaluate the aff under their interpretation ==== 14 - 15 - 16 -==Pt 1: Rules of the Game == 17 - 18 - 19 -====1. The standard of assessment is instutionalized in a practice, not the desirability of states of affairs that promote the practice. NARDIN:==== 20 -**International Ethics and International Law: Terry Nardin: Review of International Studies: Vol. 18, No. 1 (Jan., 1992), pp. 19-30 https://www.jstor.org/stable/20097279?seq=1~~#page'scan'tab'contents** 21 -The argument that the purpose-practice distinction is spurious, which underlies this moral 22 -AND 23 -as a product of obedience but as an integral aspect of behaving lawfully. 24 - 25 - 26 - 27 -====2. The rules of LD prove truth testing. ==== 28 -Impacts: 29 - 30 - 31 - 32 -==Pt 2: Framework == 33 - 34 - 35 -**====Property requires the existence of the general will—rights in the state of nature are provisional, and disputes could only be resolved through unilateral coercion. Individual rights claims are impossible absent political society; so resisting the general will is a contradiction and we must be omnilateral. Korsgaard ’08:====** 36 -(Christine, "Taking the Law into Our Own Hands: Kant on the Right to Revolution," in The Constitution of Agency: Essays on Practical Reason and Moral Psychology) OS bracketed for gender 37 -Kant also believes that there is a sense in which we have rights in the 38 -AND 39 -, is to settle the particular dispute in question in some lawful way. 40 - 41 - 42 -====Even if there are specific cases in which qualified immunity creates just outcomes, the state must first ensure that there are just procedures. **Korsgaard 8:====** 43 -**Christine "Taking the Law into Our Own Hands: Kant on the Right to Revolution" The Constitution of Agency: Essays on Practical Reason and Moral Psychology Oxford University Press http://www.klindeman.com/uploads/3/8/2/2/38221431/korsgaard'-'taking'the'law'into'our'own'hands.pdf JW** 44 -This reading, however, does not sit well with the obviously Platonic character of 45 -AND 46 -, and, normatively speaking, we must stand by their actual results. 47 - 48 - 49 -====Moral framework debate is irresolvable and uneducational - all arguments only function within a particular framework. Frameworks determine what counts as evidence or rationality, making it impossible to rationally debate between frameworks to be clear this is not aff framework choice this is aff framework suggestion. JOYCE^^ ^^:==== 50 -**Accuracy and Coherence: Prospects for an Alethic Epistemology of Partial Belief: James M. pdf?attachauth=ANoY7cpTUE5ybfRmXi3Ry9wsPdu3evfGxM0DqO5tnrq6VeVGkR5ryM7WftjBp7EsGX9cFepPQoesXpCCMXVxVO22ULg'0FSqQcjDKkiqaGeS8dHpjOCbH46pFyJylVFf4IKS8gWOf5Y'Ju7E10dK3Q8'j7ySprvYKwctKswvWZwf6ydYomRD46gt25HKhXHx7FWONx1kDQguum5yokxCQIYGfcte-evERSkOtLBAi-MVSa7lKYfM83nPhCwu0azZbH4z5AOATsIoandattredirects=0====** 51 -This distinction between what is accepted from within an institution, and "stepping out 52 -AND 53 -count as evidence that would sway the debate one way or the other. 54 - 55 - 56 -====IMPACT CALC==== 57 - 58 - 59 -====To say something is permitted is not to say that there is no possibility of a prohibition; rather it just matters that it is permitted under one locus of duty. A) This is true of obligations because the existence of an obligation doesn’t mean that there can’t be another obligation to do something else, as an obligation is just a locus of duty. B) Proving the resolution true under a specific index is sufficient to affirm regardless of any other type of index that negates. Rödl^^ ^^: ==== 60 -**Categories of the Temporal. An inquiry into the forms of the finite understanding, Harvard University Press 2012. https://voices.uchicago.edu/germanphilosophy/papers/** 61 -This view is untenable for reasons ~~this is~~ analogous to those we mounted 62 -AND 63 -believe p—thinking is true—is so affixing myself to p. 64 - 65 - 66 -====Proving a legal obligation exists is sufficient to affirm independent of moral considerations. Legal obligations are a separate locus of duty. Glos^^ ^^==== 67 -**Glos The Normative Theory of Law George E. Glos http://scholarship.law.wm.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=2772andcontext=wmlr Article 6** 68 -The mutual relation of law and ethics can profitably be investigated only if ethics is 69 -AND 70 -(norms according to which a soldier is bound to fight and kill). 71 - 72 - 73 -====Thus the burden is too link into the framework through truth claims, possibility claims, and freedom violations: Standard text’s aren’t relevant but if they become so here is the standard text: consistency with that that mandates of the Omnilateral will constrained by truth. I cannot be obligated to fly therefor obligation is constrained by truth. ==== 74 - 75 - 76 -==Pt 3: Advocacy == 77 - 78 - 79 -====Plan Text: I contend resolved: The US ought to limit qualified immunity for police officers when it is moral or consistent with the AC to do so. To be clear if there are instances in which affirming the topic is bad or contrary to the thesis of the AC then I do not defend those instances. ==== 80 - 81 - 82 -===Contentions=== 83 - 84 - 85 -====1. Qualified immunity can violate a system of equal freedom. A system of freedom necessitates the rectification of injustice. **Ripstein 6:====** 86 -**Arthur Ripstein (Professor of Law and Philosophy, University of Toronto) "Private Order and Public Justice: Kant and Rawls" U Toronto, Legal Studies Research Paper No. 894431 Virginia Law Review, Vol. 92, No. 7, 2006 April 4th 2006 http://www.law.utoronto.ca/documents/Ripstein/privateorder'publicjustice.pdf JW** 87 -Normatively, the law remains supreme even in the face of violation. Kant’s technical 88 -AND 89 -alone. Her hindrance to freedom is thus hindered by sealing it off. 90 - 91 - 92 -====2. Any legal system of rights necessitates the ability for a plaintiff to sue a defendant. **Weinrib 02:====** 93 -**Ernest J. Weinrib "Corrective Justice in a Nutshell" The University of Toronto Law Journal, Vol. 52, No. 4 (Autumn, 2002), pp. 349-356 http://www.jstor.org/stable/825933** 94 -In sophisticated systems of private law, the overarching justificatory categories expressive of correlativity are 95 -AND 96 -the same as the reasons that justify the existence of the defendant's duty. 97 - 98 - 99 -====3. Qualified immunity prevents the punishment of governmental officials who are sued for damages. **Chen 15:====** 100 -**Alan K. Chen is the William M. Beaney Memorial Research Chair and professor of law at the University of Denver Sturm College of Law, where he teaches courses in constitutional law, federal courts, and public interest law. An experienced civil rights litigator and former ACLU staff attorney, Professor Chen continues to do pro bono work in constitutional rights cases. "Qualified Immunity Liming Access to Justice and Impeding Development of the Law" Human Rights Magazine Home 2015 (Vol. 41) Vol. 41, No. 1 - Lurking in the Shadows: the Supreme Court's Quiet Attack on Civil Rights http://www.americanbar.org/publications/human'rights'magazine'home/2015—vol—41-/vol—41—no—1—-lurking-in-the-shadows—the-supreme-court-s-qui/qualified-immunity-limiting-access-to-justice-and-impeding-devel.html JW** 101 -Savana sued the school personnel who conducted the search under 42 U.S. 102 -AND 103 -law." Safford, 557 U.S. at 378–79. 104 - 105 - 106 -==Pt 4: Underview== 107 - 108 - 109 -====The role of the judge and ballot is to vote for the debater who best defends the truth or falsity of the resolution 110 - 111 - 112 -==== It's out of your jurisdiction 113 - 114 - 115 -====3. Frameworks that put an emphasis on criticism liberation or emancipation from violence are self defeating Hägglund 2’==== 116 -**Martin Hägglund: Radical Atheism: Derrida and the Time of Life, Stanford: Stanford University Press, Meridian: Crossing Aesthetics, 2008. ** 117 -Emancipatory politics does not aspire to a telos of absolute liberation, but must always 118 -AND 119 -violence (since it may be negated by the coming of other futures). 120 - 121 - 122 -====4. Negating is impossible because the very notion of qualified immunity is based on a false legal premise. It is true that we need to limit it: **Reinhardt 15====** 123 -**Stephen (circuit judge on the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit) "The Demise of Habeas Corpus and the Rise of Qualified Immunity: The Court's Ever Increasing Limitations on the Development and Enforcement of Constitutional Rights and Some Particularly Unfortunate Consequences" 113 Mich. L. Rev. 1219 (2015) JW** 124 -As in the habeas context, the doctrinal evolution of qualified immunity was not inevitable 125 -AND 126 -has once again exalted a lesser concern over the protection of constitutional rights. - EntryDate
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -2016-11-19 19:50:05.0 - Judge
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -Leah Shapiro - Opponent
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -Amos Alonzo Stagg BA - ParentRound
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -12 - Round
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -1 - Team
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -Oakwood Weiner Aff - Title
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -ND 2016 Procedure AC - Tournament
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -Glenbrooks
- Caselist.RoundClass[8]
-
- Cites
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -10 - EntryDate
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -2016-10-13 07:58:38.0 - Judge
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -NA - Opponent
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -NA - Round
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -Finals - Tournament
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -Bronx
- Caselist.RoundClass[9]
-
- Cites
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -11 - EntryDate
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -2016-11-01 21:30:38.0 - Judge
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -NA - Opponent
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -NA - Round
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -Quads - Tournament
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -Minneapple
- Caselist.RoundClass[10]
-
- EntryDate
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -2016-11-04 22:23:02.0 - Judge
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -NA - Opponent
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -NA - Round
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -Quads - Tournament
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -Minneeapple
- Caselist.RoundClass[11]
-
- Cites
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -12 - EntryDate
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -2016-11-04 22:25:15.0 - Judge
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -NA - Opponent
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -NA - Round
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -Quads - Tournament
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -Minneapple
- Caselist.RoundClass[12]
-
- Cites
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -13 - EntryDate
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -2016-11-19 19:50:03.0 - Judge
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -Leah Shapiro - Opponent
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -Amos Alonzo Stagg BA - Round
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -1 - Tournament
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -Glenbrooks
- Caselist.RoundClass[13]
-
- EntryDate
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -2016-11-20 13:32:02.740 - Judge
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -Matt Delateur - Opponent
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -Newark Science BA - Round
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -4 - Tournament
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -Glenbrooks 2016
- Caselist.CitesClass[9]
-
- Cites
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +Anything I'm Reading is disclosed on either my or Jack Warehams Wiki so be aware anything on Jacks wiki is fair game. IF IM BREAKING NEW I WILL TELL YOU BEFORE THE ROUND IF YOU INQUIRE.Also I don't disclose which advantages I'm reading unless you disclose past NR's. - EntryDate
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +2016-10-13 07:26:35.0 - Judge
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +NA - Opponent
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +NA - ParentRound
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +7 - Round
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +Quads - Team
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +Oakwood Weiner Aff - Title
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +IMPORTANT NOTE FOR BRONX - Tournament
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +Bronx