Changes for page Oakwood Weiner Aff
Summary
-
Objects (1 modified, 1 added, 8 removed)
Details
- Caselist.CitesClass[10]
-
- Cites
-
... ... @@ -1,11 +1,0 @@ 1 -All my broken positions are on my wiki, also HEADS UP anything on Jack Warehams wiki is fair game. IF I AM BREAKING NEW I WILL TELL YOU, IF YOU INQUIRE. Also tell me what the 1NC ur reading is: Tell me... 2 - 3 -1. ROTB text (if ur reading one) 4 -2. Exact CP and K alt texts 5 -3. Framework specifics/standard text of the NC or the K 6 -4. DA's (coal, drought, warming etc) 7 -5. FULL T INTERP TEXTS! (if you have bidirectional ones, tell me before the round what version of the aff is topical/ the one you want me to defend, Whole res, or plan? and i may take it into account to avoid a T debate) 8 - 9 -so yeah 10 -I LOVE READING DISCLOSURE THEORY! 11 -Interpretation: debaters must disclose all broken positions (including ACs, NCs, DAs, CPs and Ks) on the NDCA LD 2016-2017 wiki under their own name or another debaters WITH NOTIFICATION THAT UR READING FROM THEIR WIKI, school, and correct side with cites, tags, the first three and the last three words of all cards read at least an hour before the round begins. - EntryDate
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -2016-10-13 07:58:40.0 - Judge
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -NA - Opponent
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -NA - ParentRound
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -8 - Round
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -Finals - Team
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -Oakwood Weiner Aff - Title
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -IMPORTANT NOTE FOR BRONX - Tournament
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -Bronx
- Caselist.CitesClass[11]
-
- Cites
-
... ... @@ -1,10 +1,0 @@ 1 -Its the first tournament of the topic so coming up to me in prelims and asking me what I'm reading is very annoying and you probably won't get an answer and you need to chill and be fine with that. I will be breaking new almost every round and if I do read something it will go up on the wiki. Thats it. 2 - 3 -ROTB text (if ur reading one) 4 -2. Exact CP and K alt texts 5 -3. Framework specifics/standard text of the NC or the K 6 -4. DA's (coal, drought, warming etc) 7 -5. FULL T INTERP TEXTS! (if you have bidirectional ones, tell me before the round what version of the aff is topical/ the one you want me to defend, Whole res, or plan? and i may take it into account to avoid a T debate) 8 -so yeah 9 -I LOVE READING DISCLOSURE THEORY! 10 -Interpretation: debaters must disclose all broken positions (including ACs, NCs, DAs, CPs and Ks) on the NDCA LD 2016-2017 wiki under their own name or another debaters WITH NOTIFICATION THAT UR READING FROM THEIR WIKI, school, and correct side with cites, tags, the first three and the last three words of all cards read at least an hour before the round begins. - EntryDate
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -2016-11-01 21:30:40.0 - Judge
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -NA - Opponent
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -NA - ParentRound
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -9 - Round
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -Quads - Team
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -Oakwood Weiner Aff - Title
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -IMPORTANT NOTE FOR MINNEAPPLE - Tournament
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -Minneapple
- Caselist.CitesClass[12]
-
- Cites
-
... ... @@ -1,68 +1,0 @@ 1 -Pt 1: Framework 2 - 3 -ROTB 4 - 5 -The state is inevitable- speaking the language of power through policymaking is the only way to create social change in debate thus the ROTB is to evaluate the topic through competing policy actions. Coverstone 5: 6 -Alan Coverstone (masters in communication from Wake Forest, longtime debate coach) “Acting on Activism: Realizing the Vision of Debate with Pro-social Impact” Paper presented at the National Communication Association Annual Conference November 17th 2005 JW 11/18/15 7 -An important concern emerges when Mitchell describes reflexive fiat as a contest strategy capable of 8 -AND 9 -that is a fundamental cause of voter and participatory abstention in America today. 10 - 11 -Pt 1: Util 12 - 13 -Phenomenal introspection is reliable and proves that util is objectively valid. Sinhababu: 14 -Sinhababu Neil (National University of Singapore) “The epistemic argument for hedonism” http://philpapers.org/archive/SINTEA-3 accessed 2-4-16 JW 15 -The Odyssey's treatment of these events demonstrates how dramatically ancient Greek moral intuitions differ from 16 -AND 17 -favors the kind of universal hedonism that supports utilitarianism, not egoistic hedonism. 18 - 19 -Thus, the standard is maximizing happiness. Prefer the standard: 20 - 21 -1. Ethical frameworks must be theoretically legitimate. 22 -Fairness is a voter 23 -Education is a voter 24 - 25 -AND: Reductionism: personal identity doesn’t exist. 26 -Olson Eric T. (Professor of Philosophy at the University of Sheffield) “Personal Identity” Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy Aug 20, 2002; substantive revision Oct 28, 2010 http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/identity-personal/#PsyApp JW 27 -Whatever psychological continuity may amount to, a more serious worry for the Psychological Approach 28 -AND 29 -, you are both hungry and not hungry at once: a contradiction. 30 - 31 -This means consequentialism – moral theories can’t focus on individuals since there’s nothing that unifies them across time. Only states of affairs can have value. 32 - 33 -With that noted we also need to look to what’s constitutive of how the US wills so anything within normal US means should be prioritized as policy. 34 - 35 -Pt 2: Advocacy 36 - 37 -Text: The United States ought to limit qualified immunity for police officers. 38 - 39 -Solvency 40 - 41 -The Supreme Court is going to limit qualified immunity by way of the plan and affirmation of the topic. 42 - 43 -Constitutional challenges are inevitable Hill 06: 44 -(Lisa Hill, Senior ARC Fellow in Politics at the University of Adelaide, Low Voter Turnout in the United States: Is Compulsory Voting a Viable Solution?, Journal of Theoretical Politics 2006 18: 207, http://jtp.sagepub.com/content/18/2/207) 45 -Potential constitutional barriers are also an obvious concern. It does seem inevitable that compulsory 46 -AND 47 -may not look so favourably upon legislation of a considerably more controversial nature. 48 - 49 -It will be limited because the very notion of qualified immunity is based on a false legal premise: Reinhardt 15 50 -Stephen (circuit judge on the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit) “The Demise of Habeas Corpus and the Rise of Qualified Immunity: The Court's Ever Increasing Limitations on the Development and Enforcement of Constitutional Rights and Some Particularly Unfortunate Consequences” 113 Mich. L. Rev. 1219 (2015) JW 51 -As in the habeas context, the doctrinal evolution of qualified immunity was not inevitable 52 -AND 53 -has once again exalted a lesser concern over the protection of constitutional rights. 54 - 55 -Rollback 56 - 57 -Overturning law on unconstitutional or unlawful grounds reaffirms the legitimacy of the Supreme Court. 58 -Rosenfeld 04: 59 -(Professor of Constitutional Law, Constitutional Adjudication in Europe and the United States: Paradoxes and Contrast International Journal of Constitutional Law Volume 2, Number 2, October 650-1 TC) 60 -In theory at least, common law adjudication need not involve repudiation of precedents, 61 -AND 62 -constitutional adjudicator seems more delicate and precarious than that of her continental counterpart. 63 - 64 -Enforcing controversial decisions like repealing the qualified immunity act builds legitimacy Law 09: 65 -(David S., Professor of Law and Political Science – Washington University, “A Theory of Judicial Power and Judicial Review”, Georgetown Law Journal, March, 97 Geo. L.J. 723, Lexis) 66 -Part IV of this Article discusses a counterintuitive implication of a coordination-based account 67 -AND 68 -Brown v. Board of Education 27 and Cooper v. Aaron. 28 - EntryDate
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -2016-11-04 22:25:17.0 - Judge
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -NA - Opponent
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -NA - ParentRound
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -11 - Round
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -Quads - Team
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -Oakwood Weiner Aff - Title
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -ND16 Judicial Deference AC - Tournament
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -Minneapple
- Caselist.RoundClass[7]
-
- Cites
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -9
- Caselist.RoundClass[8]
-
- Cites
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -10 - EntryDate
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -2016-10-13 07:58:38.0 - Judge
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -NA - Opponent
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -NA - Round
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -Finals - Tournament
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -Bronx
- Caselist.RoundClass[9]
-
- Cites
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -11 - EntryDate
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -2016-11-01 21:30:38.0 - Judge
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -NA - Opponent
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -NA - Round
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -Quads - Tournament
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -Minneapple
- Caselist.RoundClass[10]
-
- EntryDate
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -2016-11-04 22:23:02.0 - Judge
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -NA - Opponent
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -NA - Round
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -Quads - Tournament
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -Minneeapple
- Caselist.RoundClass[11]
-
- Cites
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -12 - EntryDate
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -2016-11-04 22:25:15.0 - Judge
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -NA - Opponent
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -NA - Round
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -Quads - Tournament
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -Minneapple
- Caselist.RoundClass[12]
-
- EntryDate
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -2016-11-19 19:50:03.805 - Judge
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -Leah Shapiro - Opponent
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -Amos Alonzo Stagg BA - Round
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -1 - Tournament
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -Glenbrooks
- Caselist.CitesClass[9]
-
- Cites
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +Anything I'm Reading is disclosed on either my or Jack Warehams Wiki so be aware anything on Jacks wiki is fair game. IF IM BREAKING NEW I WILL TELL YOU BEFORE THE ROUND IF YOU INQUIRE.Also I don't disclose which advantages I'm reading unless you disclose past NR's. - EntryDate
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +2016-10-13 07:26:35.638 - Judge
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +NA - Opponent
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +NA - ParentRound
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +7 - Round
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +Quads - Team
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +Oakwood Weiner Aff - Title
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +IMPORTANT NOTE FOR BRONX - Tournament
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +Bronx