Changes for page Oakwood Weiner Aff
Summary
-
Objects (1 modified, 9 added, 1 removed)
Details
- Caselist.CitesClass[9]
-
- Cites
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -Anything I'm Reading is disclosed on either my or Jack Warehams Wiki so be aware anything on Jacks wiki is fair game. IF IM BREAKING NEW I WILL TELL YOU BEFORE THE ROUND IF YOU INQUIRE.Also I don't disclose which advantages I'm reading unless you disclose past NR's. - EntryDate
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -2016-10-13 07:26:35.638 - Judge
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -NA - Opponent
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -NA - ParentRound
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -7 - Round
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -Quads - Team
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -Oakwood Weiner Aff - Title
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -IMPORTANT NOTE FOR BRONX - Tournament
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -Bronx
- Caselist.RoundClass[7]
-
- Cites
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +9
- Caselist.CitesClass[10]
-
- Cites
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,11 @@ 1 +All my broken positions are on my wiki, also HEADS UP anything on Jack Warehams wiki is fair game. IF I AM BREAKING NEW I WILL TELL YOU, IF YOU INQUIRE. Also tell me what the 1NC ur reading is: Tell me... 2 + 3 +1. ROTB text (if ur reading one) 4 +2. Exact CP and K alt texts 5 +3. Framework specifics/standard text of the NC or the K 6 +4. DA's (coal, drought, warming etc) 7 +5. FULL T INTERP TEXTS! (if you have bidirectional ones, tell me before the round what version of the aff is topical/ the one you want me to defend, Whole res, or plan? and i may take it into account to avoid a T debate) 8 + 9 +so yeah 10 +I LOVE READING DISCLOSURE THEORY! 11 +Interpretation: debaters must disclose all broken positions (including ACs, NCs, DAs, CPs and Ks) on the NDCA LD 2016-2017 wiki under their own name or another debaters WITH NOTIFICATION THAT UR READING FROM THEIR WIKI, school, and correct side with cites, tags, the first three and the last three words of all cards read at least an hour before the round begins. - EntryDate
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +2016-10-13 07:58:40.0 - Judge
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +NA - Opponent
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +NA - ParentRound
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +8 - Round
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +Finals - Team
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +Oakwood Weiner Aff - Title
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +IMPORTANT NOTE FOR BRONX - Tournament
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +Bronx
- Caselist.CitesClass[11]
-
- Cites
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,10 @@ 1 +Its the first tournament of the topic so coming up to me in prelims and asking me what I'm reading is very annoying and you probably won't get an answer and you need to chill and be fine with that. I will be breaking new almost every round and if I do read something it will go up on the wiki. Thats it. 2 + 3 +ROTB text (if ur reading one) 4 +2. Exact CP and K alt texts 5 +3. Framework specifics/standard text of the NC or the K 6 +4. DA's (coal, drought, warming etc) 7 +5. FULL T INTERP TEXTS! (if you have bidirectional ones, tell me before the round what version of the aff is topical/ the one you want me to defend, Whole res, or plan? and i may take it into account to avoid a T debate) 8 +so yeah 9 +I LOVE READING DISCLOSURE THEORY! 10 +Interpretation: debaters must disclose all broken positions (including ACs, NCs, DAs, CPs and Ks) on the NDCA LD 2016-2017 wiki under their own name or another debaters WITH NOTIFICATION THAT UR READING FROM THEIR WIKI, school, and correct side with cites, tags, the first three and the last three words of all cards read at least an hour before the round begins. - EntryDate
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +2016-11-01 21:30:40.0 - Judge
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +NA - Opponent
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +NA - ParentRound
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +9 - Round
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +Quads - Team
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +Oakwood Weiner Aff - Title
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +IMPORTANT NOTE FOR MINNEAPPLE - Tournament
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +Minneapple
- Caselist.CitesClass[12]
-
- Cites
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,68 @@ 1 +Pt 1: Framework 2 + 3 +ROTB 4 + 5 +The state is inevitable- speaking the language of power through policymaking is the only way to create social change in debate thus the ROTB is to evaluate the topic through competing policy actions. Coverstone 5: 6 +Alan Coverstone (masters in communication from Wake Forest, longtime debate coach) “Acting on Activism: Realizing the Vision of Debate with Pro-social Impact” Paper presented at the National Communication Association Annual Conference November 17th 2005 JW 11/18/15 7 +An important concern emerges when Mitchell describes reflexive fiat as a contest strategy capable of 8 +AND 9 +that is a fundamental cause of voter and participatory abstention in America today. 10 + 11 +Pt 1: Util 12 + 13 +Phenomenal introspection is reliable and proves that util is objectively valid. Sinhababu: 14 +Sinhababu Neil (National University of Singapore) “The epistemic argument for hedonism” http://philpapers.org/archive/SINTEA-3 accessed 2-4-16 JW 15 +The Odyssey's treatment of these events demonstrates how dramatically ancient Greek moral intuitions differ from 16 +AND 17 +favors the kind of universal hedonism that supports utilitarianism, not egoistic hedonism. 18 + 19 +Thus, the standard is maximizing happiness. Prefer the standard: 20 + 21 +1. Ethical frameworks must be theoretically legitimate. 22 +Fairness is a voter 23 +Education is a voter 24 + 25 +AND: Reductionism: personal identity doesn’t exist. 26 +Olson Eric T. (Professor of Philosophy at the University of Sheffield) “Personal Identity” Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy Aug 20, 2002; substantive revision Oct 28, 2010 http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/identity-personal/#PsyApp JW 27 +Whatever psychological continuity may amount to, a more serious worry for the Psychological Approach 28 +AND 29 +, you are both hungry and not hungry at once: a contradiction. 30 + 31 +This means consequentialism – moral theories can’t focus on individuals since there’s nothing that unifies them across time. Only states of affairs can have value. 32 + 33 +With that noted we also need to look to what’s constitutive of how the US wills so anything within normal US means should be prioritized as policy. 34 + 35 +Pt 2: Advocacy 36 + 37 +Text: The United States ought to limit qualified immunity for police officers. 38 + 39 +Solvency 40 + 41 +The Supreme Court is going to limit qualified immunity by way of the plan and affirmation of the topic. 42 + 43 +Constitutional challenges are inevitable Hill 06: 44 +(Lisa Hill, Senior ARC Fellow in Politics at the University of Adelaide, Low Voter Turnout in the United States: Is Compulsory Voting a Viable Solution?, Journal of Theoretical Politics 2006 18: 207, http://jtp.sagepub.com/content/18/2/207) 45 +Potential constitutional barriers are also an obvious concern. It does seem inevitable that compulsory 46 +AND 47 +may not look so favourably upon legislation of a considerably more controversial nature. 48 + 49 +It will be limited because the very notion of qualified immunity is based on a false legal premise: Reinhardt 15 50 +Stephen (circuit judge on the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit) “The Demise of Habeas Corpus and the Rise of Qualified Immunity: The Court's Ever Increasing Limitations on the Development and Enforcement of Constitutional Rights and Some Particularly Unfortunate Consequences” 113 Mich. L. Rev. 1219 (2015) JW 51 +As in the habeas context, the doctrinal evolution of qualified immunity was not inevitable 52 +AND 53 +has once again exalted a lesser concern over the protection of constitutional rights. 54 + 55 +Rollback 56 + 57 +Overturning law on unconstitutional or unlawful grounds reaffirms the legitimacy of the Supreme Court. 58 +Rosenfeld 04: 59 +(Professor of Constitutional Law, Constitutional Adjudication in Europe and the United States: Paradoxes and Contrast International Journal of Constitutional Law Volume 2, Number 2, October 650-1 TC) 60 +In theory at least, common law adjudication need not involve repudiation of precedents, 61 +AND 62 +constitutional adjudicator seems more delicate and precarious than that of her continental counterpart. 63 + 64 +Enforcing controversial decisions like repealing the qualified immunity act builds legitimacy Law 09: 65 +(David S., Professor of Law and Political Science – Washington University, “A Theory of Judicial Power and Judicial Review”, Georgetown Law Journal, March, 97 Geo. L.J. 723, Lexis) 66 +Part IV of this Article discusses a counterintuitive implication of a coordination-based account 67 +AND 68 +Brown v. Board of Education 27 and Cooper v. Aaron. 28 - EntryDate
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +2016-11-04 22:25:17.0 - Judge
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +NA - Opponent
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +NA - ParentRound
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +11 - Round
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +Quads - Team
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +Oakwood Weiner Aff - Title
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +ND16 Judicial Deference AC - Tournament
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +Minneapple
- Caselist.CitesClass[14]
-
- Cites
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,64 @@ 1 +The state is inevitable- speaking the language of power through policymaking is the only way to create social change in debate. 2 +Coverstone 5 Alan Coverstone (masters in communication from Wake Forest, longtime debate coach) “Acting on Activism: Realizing the Vision of Debate with Pro-social Impact” Paper presented at the National Communication Association Annual Conference November 17th 2005 JW 11/18/15 3 +An important concern ... in America today. 4 +Adv 1 = Crime 5 +Crime is high now—low trust in police is the root cause. 6 +The Week 15 “Violent crime surges in US cities: is 'Ferguson effect' to blame?” June 3rd 2015 http://www.theweek.co.uk/63860/violent-crime-surges-in-us-cities-is-ferguson-effect-to-blame JW 7 +Violent crime is ... part as well." 8 +The plan is key to rebuilding trust between police and civilians offsetting the perception that police are unaccountable. 9 +De Stefan 16 Lindsey De Stefan (J.D. Candidate, 2017, Seton Hall University School of Law; B.A., Ramapo College of New Jersey) ““No Man Is Above the Law and No Man Is Below It:” How Qualified Immunity Reform Could Create Accountability and Curb Widespread Police Misconduct” Law School Student Scholarship. Paper 850 2017 http://scholarship.shu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1861andcontext=student_scholarship JW 10 +Altering the qualified ... the citizen- police relationship. 11 +Police legitimacy is nearing an irreversible collapse—rebuilding trust now is key. 12 +Ryback 8/5 R.T. Ryback “Police, race and crime: We're not a point of no return on trust, but we're close” Star Tribune August 5th 2016 http://www.startribune.com/police-race-and-crime-we-re-not-a-point-of-no-return-on-trust-but-we-re-close/389346501/ JW 13 +A few weeks ... solve deeper issues. 14 +Police legitimacy is key to preventing crime. 15 +NIJ 16 National Institute of Justice “Race, Trust and Police Legitimacy” July 14th 2016 http://www.nij.gov/topics/law-enforcement/legitimacy/pages/welcome.aspx JW 16 +Research consistently shows ... within one's neighborhood. 1 17 +The US has soft power now. 18 +Nye 15 Joseph (Distinguished Service Professor, Harvard Kennedy School of Government; Author, Is the American Century Over?) “Charting the Next American Century” March 4th 2015 Council on Foreign Relations http://www.cfr.org/united-states/charting-next-american-century/p36194#ER JW 19 +NYE: This is ... the United States. 20 +Lowering crime is key to maintaining soft power. 21 +Falk 12 Richard (United Nations Special Rapporteur on Palestinian human rights) “When soft power is hard” Al Jazeera July 28th 2012 http://www.aljazeera.com/indepth/opinion/2012/07/201272212435524825.html 22 +This unabashed avowal ... cure unknown", applies. 23 +Soft power solves multiple existential threats. 24 +Lagon 11 Mark P. (International Relations and Security Chair at Georgetown University's Master of Science in Foreign Service Program and adjunct senior fellow at the Council on Foreign Relations. He is the former US Ambassador-at-Large to Combat Trafficking in Persons at the US Department of State) “The Value of Values: Soft Power Under Obama” World Affairs Journal Sept/Oct 2011 http://www.worldaffairsjournal.org/article/value-values-soft-power-under-obama#ER 25 +Despite large economic ... is seriously amiss. 26 +Adv 2 = Police Brutality 27 +The “clearly established” clause of qualified immunity allows police brutality to continue with no deterrence—limitation is needed. 28 +Wright 15 Sam (public interest lawyer) “Want to Fight Police Misconduct? Reform Qualified Immunity” November 3rd 2015 Above the Law http://abovethelaw.com/2015/11/want-to-fight-police-misconduct-reform-qualified-immunity/ JW 29 +Under ArrestRecently, police ... to make it happen. 30 +Qualified immunity sets a precedent for dismissal of civil rights suits, which maintains the legitimacy of the police state. 31 +Carter 15 Tom (World Socialist Website) “US Supreme Court expands immunity for killer cops” International Committee of the Fourth International November 12th 2015 32 +With the death ... kill a cop!’” 33 +Police brutality causes numerous physiological and psychological harms to minorities. 34 +Turner and Richardson 16 Erlanger A. Turner (Assistant Professor of Psychology, University of Houston-Downtown) and Jasmine Richardson (BS earned her psychology degree from the University of Houston- Downtown (UHD)) “Racial Trauma is Real: The Impact of Police Shootings on African Americans” Psychology Benefits Society July 14th 2016 https://psychologybenefits.org/2016/07/14/racial-trauma-police-shootings-on-african-americans/ JW 35 +There have been ... as an expected outcome 36 +Police brutality undermines US diplomacy power. 37 +Pullen 14 Bethany “The Achilles Heel of U.S. Public Diplomacy: Race Relations and Police Violence” http://uscpublicdiplomacy.org/blog/achilles-heel-us-public-diplomacy-race-relations-and-police-violence September 8th 2014 JW 38 +It is a ... promoting legislative changes. 39 +Absent continued diplomacy, conflict becomes inevitable 40 +Grygiel 8 Jakub (George H. W. Bush Associate Professor at The Paul H. Nitze School of Advanced International Studies) May 1st 2008 “The Diplomacy Fallacy” American Interest http://www.the-american-interest.com/2008/05/01/the-diplomacy-fallacy/ 41 +These three conditions ... interest is impossible. 42 +Effective diplomacy solves nuke war. 43 +Ross 99 Douglas (professor of political science at Simon Fraser University) “Canada’s functional isolationism and the future of weapons of mass destruction” International Journal lexis 44 +Thus, an easily ... or other WMD. 45 +Plan Text 46 +Resolved: the United States will replace the ‘clearly established’ standard in qualified immunity doctrines with a ‘clearly unconstitutional’ standard. 47 +The plan solves by providing adequate civil rights protections while maintaining consistency with current law- that no-links disads. 48 +Jeffries 10 John C. (University of Virginia School of Law) “What’s Wrong With Qualified Immunity?” University of Virginia School of Law Public Law and Legal Theory Research Paper Series No. 2010-21 JW 49 +A second suggestion ... is ―clearly unconstitutional.‖ 84 50 +Framework 51 +Phenomenal introspection is reliable and proves that util’s true. 52 +Sinhababu Neil (National University of Singapore) “The epistemic argument for hedonism” http://philpapers.org/archive/SINTEA-3 accessed 2-4-16 JW 53 +The Odyssey's treatment ... not egoistic hedonism. 54 +Thus, the standard is maximizing happiness. Prefer the standard: 55 +1 Reductionism: personal identity doesn’t exist. 56 +2 Olson Eric T. (Professor of Philosophy at the University of Sheffield) “Personal Identity” Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy Aug 20, 2002; substantive revision Oct 28, 2010 http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/identity-personal/#PsyApp JW 57 +3 Whatever psychological continuity ... once: a contradiction. 58 +2. Moral uncertainty means we should prevent extinction—it’s irreversible and prevents ethical deliberation or value. 59 +Bostrom 13 Nick Bostrom (Professor, Faculty of Philosophy and Oxford Martin School Director, Future of Humanity Institute Director, Oxford Martin Programme on the Impacts of Future Technology University of Oxford) “Existential Risk Prevention as Global Priority” Global Policy Volume 4 . Issue 1 . February 2013 http://www.existential-risk.org/concept.pdf JW 60 +Keeping our options ... any existential catastrophe. 61 +Underview 62 +Critique is useless without a concrete policy option that solves for your harms. 63 +Bryant 12 Levi Bryant (Professor of Philosophy at Collin College) “A Critique of the Academic Left” 2012 https://larvalsubjects.wordpress.com/2012/11/11/underpants-gnomes-a-critique-of-the-academic-left/ JW 64 +Unfortunately, the academic ... distribution of medicines, etc., etc., etc. - EntryDate
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +2016-11-20 13:32:04.0 - Judge
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +Matt Delateur - Opponent
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +Newark Science BA - ParentRound
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +13 - Round
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +4 - Team
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +Oakwood Weiner Aff - Title
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +ND16 Util AC - Tournament
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +Glenbrooks 2016
- Caselist.RoundClass[8]
-
- Cites
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +10 - EntryDate
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +2016-10-13 07:58:38.0 - Judge
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +NA - Opponent
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +NA - Round
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +Finals - Tournament
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +Bronx
- Caselist.RoundClass[9]
-
- Cites
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +11 - EntryDate
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +2016-11-01 21:30:38.0 - Judge
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +NA - Opponent
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +NA - Round
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +Quads - Tournament
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +Minneapple
- Caselist.RoundClass[10]
-
- EntryDate
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +2016-11-04 22:23:02.0 - Judge
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +NA - Opponent
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +NA - Round
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +Quads - Tournament
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +Minneeapple
- Caselist.RoundClass[11]
-
- Cites
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +12 - EntryDate
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +2016-11-04 22:25:15.0 - Judge
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +NA - Opponent
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +NA - Round
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +Quads - Tournament
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +Minneapple
- Caselist.RoundClass[13]
-
- Cites
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +14 - EntryDate
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +2016-11-20 13:32:02.0 - Judge
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +Matt Delateur - Opponent
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +Newark Science BA - Round
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +4 - Tournament
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +Glenbrooks 2016