| ... |
... |
@@ -1,0
+1,89 @@ |
|
1 |
+sorry if i read this aff against you |
|
2 |
+ |
|
3 |
+=SO 2016 ILAW AC Ver 2 Oakwood AW= |
|
4 |
+ |
|
5 |
+ |
|
6 |
+==Part 1: Framework== |
|
7 |
+ |
|
8 |
+ |
|
9 |
+====I affirm. International Law is best:==== |
|
10 |
+ |
|
11 |
+ |
|
12 |
+====1) Governments are necessarily …can’t be resolved.==== |
|
13 |
+ |
|
14 |
+ |
|
15 |
+====2) Contracts preclude the …to generating obligations.==== |
|
16 |
+ |
|
17 |
+ |
|
18 |
+====3) The standard of assessment is instutionalized in a practice, not the desirability of states of affairs that promote the practice. NARDIN:^^ ^^https://www.jstor.org/stable/20097279?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents |
|
19 |
+International Ethics and International Law |
|
20 |
+Terry Nardin Review of International Studies Vol. 18, No. 1 (Jan., 1992), pp. 19-30==== |
|
21 |
+The argument that ... behaving lawfully. |
|
22 |
+ |
|
23 |
+ |
|
24 |
+ |
|
25 |
+ |
|
26 |
+====This means for any prioritization to count as resolutional action, it must be done within the practice of international law. Rules of international law define what it means to be a country in the international arena, even if states have different domestic ends. NARDIN 2:^^ ^^https://www.jstor.org/stable/20097279?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents |
|
27 |
+International Ethics and International Law |
|
28 |
+Terry Nardin Review of International Studies Vol. 18, No. 1 (Jan., 1992), pp. 19-30======== |
|
29 |
+Any description of ...a morality of^^^^coexistence. |
|
30 |
+ |
|
31 |
+ |
|
32 |
+====The standard is consistency with international law. Prefer additionally: ==== |
|
33 |
+ |
|
34 |
+ |
|
35 |
+====1. Moral theories that impose absolute rules fail because there is nothing inherent neither to the rule nor in the interpretation of the rule that can determine how to follow the rule. LANGSETH:==== |
|
36 |
+Langesth, Jonathan. "Wittengenstein’s Account of Rule-Following and Its Implications"http://www.bsu.edu/libraries/beneficencepress/stance/2008_spring/12Wittgenstein.pdf. |
|
37 |
+This section shows that rules themselves do not determine how they are to be followed |
|
38 |
+AND |
|
39 |
+be posited to apply this same idea to any rule-governed activity. |
|
40 |
+ |
|
41 |
+ |
|
42 |
+====Three Impacts: A) Social practices are only interpreted through laws. Langseth 2==== |
|
43 |
+Over time and language is used |
|
44 |
+ |
|
45 |
+ |
|
46 |
+====D) Moral framework debate is irresolvable and uneducational - all arguments only function within a particular framework. Frameworks determine what counts as evidence or rationality, making it impossible to rationally debate between frameworks to be clear this is not aff framework choice this is aff framework suggestion. JOYCE^^ ^^Accuracy and Coherence: Prospects |
|
47 |
+for an Alethic Epistemology of Partial Belief: James M. Joyce:https://86b944b3-a-62cb3a1a-s-sites.googlegroups.com/site/michaeltitelbaum/teaching/phil903f09/Joyceaccuracy.pdf?attachauth=ANoY7cpTUE5ybfRmXi3Ry9wsPdu3evfGxM0DqO5tnrq6VeVGkR5ryM7WftjBp7EsGX9cFepPQoesXpCCMXVxVO22ULg_0FSqQcjDKkiqaGeS8dHpjOCbH46pFyJylVFf4IKS8gWOf5Y_Ju7E10dK3Q8_j7ySprvYKwctKswvWZwf6ydYomRD46gt25HKhXHx7FWONx1kDQguum5yokxCQIYGfcte-evERSkOtLBAi-MVSa7lKYfM83nPhCwu0azZbH4z5AOATsIoandattredirects=0==== |
|
48 |
+This distinction between or the other. |
|
49 |
+ |
|
50 |
+ |
|
51 |
+====IMPACT CALC==== |
|
52 |
+ |
|
53 |
+ |
|
54 |
+====To say something is permitted is not to say that there is no possibility of a prohibition; rather it just matters that it is permitted under one locus of duty. A) This is true of obligations because the existence of an obligation doesn’t mean that there can’t be another obligation to do something else, as an obligation is just a locus of duty. B) Proving the resolution true under a specific index is sufficient to affirm regardless of any other type of index that negates. Rödl^^ ^^:https://voices.uchicago.edu/germanphilosophy/papers/ ==== |
|
55 |
+This view is myself to p. |
|
56 |
+ |
|
57 |
+ |
|
58 |
+====Proving a legal obligation exists is sufficient to affirm independent of moral considerations. Legal obligations are a separate locus of duty. Glos^^ ^^The Normative Theory of Law George E. Glos http://scholarship.law.wm.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=2772andcontext=wmlr |
|
59 |
+Article 6==== |
|
60 |
+The mutual relation ...fight and kill). |
|
61 |
+ |
|
62 |
+ |
|
63 |
+====And, an action is right if there isn’t a prohibition on it. Timmons^^ ^^ TIMMONS, MARK, 1951 FROM MORAL THEORIES: AN INTRODUCTION |
|
64 |
+https://books.google.com/books?id=qWGp1iK9IlACandpg=PA155andlpg=PA155anddq=an+action+is+correct+if+there+is+no+prohibition+on+it+timmonsandsource=blandots=lqjlPt2miiandsig=hO2CZKZMe05A3RowObWkWukpDJ4andhl=enandsa=Xandved=0ahUKEwicr7egntfPAhUMHT4KHbvRA5wQ6AEIMjAG#v=onepageandq=an20action20is20correct20if20there20is20no20prohibition20on20it20timmonsandf=false==== |
|
65 |
+When the term ...of these categories. |
|
66 |
+ |
|
67 |
+ |
|
68 |
+==Advocacy== |
|
69 |
+ |
|
70 |
+ |
|
71 |
+====I contend Resolved: Countries ought to prohibit production of nuclear power if they have violated international law regarding production, waste disposal, construction, or environmental concerns pertaining to nuclear power production by revoking there license. ==== |
|
72 |
+**1st International law is key in all things nuclear energy related doings means a prohibition is the same so affirm ElBaradei:** |
|
73 |
+Mr. ElBaradei is Assistant Director General and Director of the IAEA Division of External |
|
74 |
+AND |
|
75 |
+has yielded a mix of legally binding rules and advisory standards and regulations. |
|
76 |
+ |
|
77 |
+ |
|
78 |
+**====We could start with countries that don’t observe the NPT but it doesn’t really matter Stefanos ’13:====** |
|
79 |
+**Breaking Down the Top 5 International Laws, Treaties, and Conventions You’ll Hear Being Discussed in Committee by LSTEFANOS on NOVEMBER 25, 2013 http://bestdelegate.com/breaking-down-the-top-5-international-laws-treaties-and-conventions-youll-hear-being-discussed-in-committee/ Oakwood AW** |
|
80 |
+Probably the most controversial law on the international agenda, the NPT works with the |
|
81 |
+AND |
|
82 |
+don’t let that stop you from bringing it up in DISEC or SPECPOL! |
|
83 |
+ |
|
84 |
+ |
|
85 |
+==Underview== |
|
86 |
+ |
|
87 |
+ |
|
88 |
+====role of the judge and ballot is to vote for the debater who best defends the truth or falsity of the resolution==== |
|
89 |
+REST MAY CHANGE |