| ... |
... |
@@ -1,0
+1,7 @@ |
|
1 |
+If debaters read aff paradigm choice, they must clarify in a delineated text in the AC a method by which we weigh between the discursive reasons to vote aff against the plan text, and how the negative can link in offense in order to win. |
|
2 |
+ |
|
3 |
+If debaters read a plan, it must have a solvency advocate. To clarify, the solvency advocate must minimally advocate for the mandates of the aff plan. |
|
4 |
+ |
|
5 |
+All theory interpretations must have an interpretation advocate, defined as an author who has publicly defended the interp in writing. |
|
6 |
+Palmer 15 Chris (coach for Lexington) “A theory of theory” azuen 3-3-15 http://www.azuen.net/2015/03/03/a-theory-of-theory/ JW |
|
7 |
+So I propose ... do the same. |