Changes for page Oakwood Wareham Neg
Last modified by Administrator on 2017/08/29 03:38
Change comment:
There is no comment for this version
Summary
-
Objects (1 modified, 1 added, 0 removed)
Details
- Caselist.RoundClass[35]
-
- EntryDate
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,1 @@ 1 -2016-10-14 14:51:49. 6381 +2016-10-14 14:51:49.0
- Caselist.CitesClass[28]
-
- Cites
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,17 @@ 1 +If debaters read aff paradigm choice, they must clarify in a delineated text in the AC a method by which we weigh between the discursive reasons to vote aff against the plan text, and how the negative can link in offense in order to win. 2 + 3 +If debaters read a plan, it must have a solvency advocate. To clarify, the solvency advocate must minimally advocate for the mandates of the aff plan. 4 + 5 +If debaters read say the neg should engage them on the role of the ballot for theoretical reasons, they may not say that consequences aren’t relevant underneath their framework. 6 + 7 +The aff cannot read arguments that require the negative to “explicitly propose all T interpretations about my advocacy such as specification and implementation”. 8 + 9 +Debaters must read cites for statistics and evidence. 10 + 11 +The aff plan text must constitute a policy that could be enacted. 12 + 13 +If debaters claim they get an RVI, they must specify in their speech the conditions under which it can be triggered. To clarify, whether the RVI requires offense to a counter interp vs. I meets, drop the argument vs. debater, competing interps vs. reasonability. 14 + 15 +Debaters may not say “thus the plan” in the AC, read an advocacy text and then claim in the 1AR it was just a "rhetorical flair." 16 + 17 +Debaters can't say that death is good in the 1AR if they read an aff with death impacts in the AC and the neg read disads linking to death. - EntryDate
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +2016-10-14 14:51:50.862 - Judge
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +x - Opponent
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +x - ParentRound
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +35 - Round
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +9 - Team
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +Oakwood Wareham Neg - Title
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +0 - Broken Interps - Tournament
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +all