| ... |
... |
@@ -1,20
+1,0 @@ |
| 1 |
|
-Interpretation: topical plans end restrictions on constitutionally protected free speech, not freedom of the press. |
| 2 |
|
-Fredom of press and freedom of speech are legally distinct |
| 3 |
|
-Wells, Thomas R., PhD. "Freedom of the Press Is Not the Same as Freedom of Speech." The Philosopher's Beard. N.p., 3 Jan. 2013. Web. |
| 4 |
|
-Freedom of the ... underlying intrinsic moral claim. |
| 5 |
|
- |
| 6 |
|
-Speech refers to spoken word, as opposed to press which refers to printed word |
| 7 |
|
-Volokh 12 (Eugene, Gary T. Schwartz Professor of Law, UCLA School of Law, “FREEDOM FOR THE PRESS AS AN INDUSTRY, OR FOR THE PRESS AS A TECHNOLOGY? FROM THE FRAMING TO TODAY “. 2012. p.g. 475 AK) Brackets found in the original. |
| 8 |
|
-The freedom of ... “printing and publishing.” |
| 9 |
|
- |
| 10 |
|
-Violation: |
| 11 |
|
- |
| 12 |
|
-Standards |
| 13 |
|
-1 Textuality: the aff has a deontological obligation to be topical – this both excludes pragmatic justifications and controls key internal links to them. |
| 14 |
|
-Nebel 15 - 1 (Jake Nebel, a gucci dude, “The Priority of Resolutional Semantics” February 2015 AK) |
| 15 |
|
-A second strategy ... I discuss below. |
| 16 |
|
- |
| 17 |
|
-2 |
| 18 |
|
-Drop the debater on T: |
| 19 |
|
- |
| 20 |
|
-Yes competing interps: |