Changes for page North Hollywood Stern Neg
Summary
-
Objects (3 modified, 2 added, 2 removed)
Details
- Caselist.CitesClass[75]
-
- Cites
-
... ... @@ -1,5 +1,0 @@ 1 -A. Interpretation - Aff must defend the hypothetical enactment of a plan under the scope of the resolution. 2 - 3 -A. Interpretation - The Affirmative must defend a limit of qualified immunity for police officers – to clarify, they can’t defend its abolition altogether. 4 - 5 -A. Interpretation - Aff may only defend a limitation on qualified immunity. To clarify, they can’t defend a limitation on qualified immunity plus something else. - EntryDate
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -2017-02-15 04:02:28.0 - Judge
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -X - Opponent
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -X - ParentRound
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -37 - Round
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -9 - Team
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -North Hollywood Stern Neg - Title
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -NOVDEC T Interps - Tournament
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -X
- Caselist.CitesClass[76]
-
- EntryDate
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,1 @@ 1 -2017-02-1 504:02:29.01 +2017-02-12 21:11:21.0
- Caselist.CitesClass[77]
-
- EntryDate
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,1 @@ 1 -2017-02-1 504:02:29.01 +2017-02-12 21:11:21.0
- Caselist.CitesClass[78]
-
- EntryDate
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,1 @@ 1 -2017-02-1 504:02:30.5351 +2017-02-12 21:11:22.0
- Caselist.RoundClass[37]
-
- EntryDate
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -2017-02-15 04:02:26.0 - Judge
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -X - Opponent
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -X - Round
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -9 - Tournament
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -X
- Caselist.CitesClass[79]
-
- Cites
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,3 @@ 1 +A. Interpretation - If the aff reads a standard of “maximizing expected wellbeing,” the aff must specify a) a probability calculus to use for expected and b) a comprehensive account of what determines wellbeing. 2 +A. Interpretation - Debaters must disclose previously run constructive positions – all cases, off cases and theory arguments – at least 30 minutes before the round on the NDCA wiki. This means providing proper citations for all evidence including first three and last three words and tags as well as advocacy, standard, and interpretation texts. 3 +A. Interpretation - The AC advocacy is binding. - EntryDate
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +2017-02-12 21:11:23.0 - Judge
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +X - Opponent
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +X - ParentRound
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +37 - Round
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +9 - Team
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +North Hollywood Stern Neg - Title
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +JANFEB Theory Interps - Tournament
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +X
- Caselist.CitesClass[80]
-
- Cites
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,2 @@ 1 +A. Interpretation - Aff must defend that colleges restrict absolutely no free speech. 2 +A. Interpretation - Aff must defend that public colleges and universities in general ought not restrict any constitutionally protected speech. To clarify, they can’t specify a or some specific school(s) or type of schools that do the Aff. - EntryDate
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +2017-02-12 21:11:23.0 - Judge
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +X - Opponent
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +X - ParentRound
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +37 - Round
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +9 - Team
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +North Hollywood Stern Neg - Title
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +JANFEB T Interps - Tournament
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +X