Changes for page North Hollywood Stern Neg
Summary
-
Objects (0 modified, 1 added, 0 removed)
Details
- Caselist.CitesClass[75]
-
- Cites
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,5 @@ 1 +A. Interpretation - Aff must defend the hypothetical enactment of a plan under the scope of the resolution. 2 + 3 +A. Interpretation - The Affirmative must defend a limit of qualified immunity for police officers – to clarify, they can’t defend its abolition altogether. 4 + 5 +A. Interpretation - Aff may only defend a limitation on qualified immunity. To clarify, they can’t defend a limitation on qualified immunity plus something else. - EntryDate
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +2017-02-12 21:11:20.0 - Judge
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +X - Opponent
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +X - ParentRound
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +37 - Round
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +9 - Team
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +North Hollywood Stern Neg - Title
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +NOVDEC T Interps - Tournament
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +X